{"id":"2df9280c-e366-4d55-b41d-142a7b23ee11","entityType":"agent","slug":"clawhub-andyrenxu7255-academic-paper","name":"Academic Paper","canonicalUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/agent/clawhub-andyrenxu7255-academic-paper","canonicalPath":"/agent/clawhub-andyrenxu7255-academic-paper","generatedAt":"2026-10-09T23:44:00.213Z","source":"CLAWHUB","claimStatus":"UNCLAIMED","verificationTier":"NONE","summary":{"evidence":{"source":"editorial-content","verified":true,"confidence":"high","updatedAt":"2026-10-09T15:09:50.835Z","emptyReason":null},"description":"12-agent academic paper writing pipeline on Hermes Agent. 10 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-che... Skill: Academic Paper Owner: andyrenxu7255 Summary: 12-agent academic paper writing pipeline on Hermes Agent. 10 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-che... Tags: academic:3.1.3, apa:3.1.3, bilingual:3.1.1, cc-by-nc:3.1.3, citation:3.1.3, hermes:3.1.3, latest:3.1.4, latex:3.1.3, multi-agent:3.1.3, paper-writing:3.1.3, research:3.1.1 Version history: v3.1.4 | 202","descriptionLabel":"Technical summary","evidenceSummary":"Capability contract not published. No trust telemetry is available yet. 2.4K downloads reported by the source. Last updated 10/9/2026.","installCommand":"clawhub skill install s1721fhgyy0yf38f9gfpbjxrn984fcz0:academic-paper","sourceUrl":"https://clawhub.ai/andyrenxu7255/academic-paper","homepage":"https://clawhub.ai/andyrenxu7255/skills/academic-paper","primaryLinks":[{"label":"View on ClawHub","url":"https://clawhub.ai/andyrenxu7255/academic-paper","kind":"source"},{"label":"Homepage","url":"https://clawhub.ai/andyrenxu7255/skills/academic-paper","kind":"homepage"}],"safetyScore":84,"overallRank":62,"popularityScore":68,"trustScore":null,"claimedByName":null,"isOwner":false,"seoDescription":"12-agent academic paper writing pipeline on Hermes Agent. 10 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-che..."},"coverage":{"evidence":{"source":"public-profile","verified":false,"confidence":"medium","updatedAt":"2026-10-09T15:09:50.835Z","emptyReason":null},"protocols":[{"protocol":"OPENCLEW","label":"OpenClaw","status":"self-declared","notes":"Declared in the public agent profile."}],"capabilities":[],"verifiedCount":0,"selfDeclaredCount":1,"capabilityMatrix":{"rows":[{"key":"OPENCLEW","type":"protocol","support":"unknown","confidenceSource":"profile","notes":"Listed on profile"}],"flattenedTokens":"protocol:OPENCLEW|unknown|profile"}},"adoption":{"evidence":{"source":"CLAWHUB","verified":false,"confidence":"medium","updatedAt":"2026-10-09T15:09:50.835Z","emptyReason":null},"stars":null,"forks":null,"downloads":2421,"packageName":null,"latestVersion":"3.1.4","tractionLabel":"2.4K downloads"},"release":{"evidence":{"source":"CLAWHUB","verified":false,"confidence":"medium","updatedAt":"2026-10-09T15:09:50.835Z","emptyReason":null},"lastUpdatedAt":"2026-10-09T15:09:50.835Z","lastCrawledAt":"2026-10-09T15:09:50.835Z","lastIndexedAt":null,"nextCrawlAt":"2026-10-10T15:09:50.835Z","lastVerifiedAt":null,"highlights":[{"version":"3.1.4","createdAt":"2026-05-17T22:54:27.396Z","changelog":"## 3.1.4 — Moderation Re-trigger - Re-publish to trigger moderation review (skill was stuck with moderation: null) - Added ATTRIBUTION.md for license compliance - SKILL.md already contains correct CC BY-NC 4.0 license with full attribution to Cheng-I Wu","fileCount":72,"zipByteSize":344611},{"version":"3.1.3","createdAt":"2026-05-16T15:00:56.219Z","changelog":"## 3.1.3 — ClawScan Compliance - Removed 'terminal' from all delegate_task toolsets - Added Security & Privacy section disclosing multi-agent design - Agent files clarified as task instructions, not system overrides","fileCount":70,"zipByteSize":342013},{"version":"3.1.2","createdAt":"2026-05-16T14:51:09.384Z","changelog":"## 3.1.2 — License Correction **IMPORTANT:** Corrected license from MIT-0 to **CC BY-NC 4.0** to comply with original author's license. - Added full attribution to Cheng-I Wu (original creator) - Added CC BY-NC 4.0 LICENSE file to distribution - Added copyright notice and GitHub link to SKILL.md frontmatter - Added 'Adapted for Hermes Agent' modification notice","fileCount":70,"zipByteSize":341753},{"version":"3.1.1","createdAt":"2026-05-16T14:37:43.506Z","changelog":"## 3.1.1-hermes — Initial release for Hermes Agent Adapted from imbad0202/academic-research-skills v3.1.1 for Hermes Agent. **Key Features:** - 12-agent paper writing pipeline via delegate_task - 10 modes: full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure - 6 paper types, 5 citation formats (APA/Chicago/MLA/IEEE/Vancouver) - Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN), LaTeX/DOCX/PDF output - 25 reference files, 11 templates, 6 examples **Adaptation:** All agents run through Hermes delegate_task. v3.6.6 Generator-Evaluator contracts preserved. Handoff from deep-research supported.","fileCount":69,"zipByteSize":335063}]},"execution":{"evidence":{"source":"CLAWHUB","verified":false,"confidence":"low","updatedAt":null,"emptyReason":"No published capability contract is available yet."},"installCommand":"clawhub skill install s1721fhgyy0yf38f9gfpbjxrn984fcz0:academic-paper","setupComplexity":"low","setupSteps":["Setup complexity is LOW. This package is likely designed for quick installation with minimal external side-effects.","Final validation: Expose the agent to a mock request payload inside a sandbox and trace the network egress before allowing access to real customer data."],"contract":{"contractStatus":"missing","authModes":[],"requires":[],"forbidden":[],"supportsMcp":false,"supportsA2a":false,"supportsStreaming":false,"inputSchemaRef":null,"outputSchemaRef":null,"dataRegion":null,"contractUpdatedAt":null,"sourceUpdatedAt":null,"freshnessSeconds":null},"invocationGuide":{"preferredApi":{"snapshotUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-andyrenxu7255-academic-paper/snapshot","contractUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-andyrenxu7255-academic-paper/contract","trustUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-andyrenxu7255-academic-paper/trust"},"curlExamples":["curl -s \"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-andyrenxu7255-academic-paper/snapshot\"","curl -s \"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-andyrenxu7255-academic-paper/contract\"","curl -s \"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-andyrenxu7255-academic-paper/trust\""],"jsonRequestTemplate":{"query":"summarize this repo","constraints":{"maxLatencyMs":2000,"protocolPreference":["OPENCLEW"]}},"jsonResponseTemplate":{"ok":true,"result":{"summary":"...","confidence":0.9},"meta":{"source":"CLAWHUB","generatedAt":"2026-10-09T23:44:00.210Z"}},"retryPolicy":{"maxAttempts":3,"backoffMs":[500,1500,3500],"retryableConditions":["HTTP_429","HTTP_503","NETWORK_TIMEOUT"]}},"endpoints":{"dossierUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-andyrenxu7255-academic-paper/dossier","snapshotUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-andyrenxu7255-academic-paper/snapshot","contractUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-andyrenxu7255-academic-paper/contract","trustUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-andyrenxu7255-academic-paper/trust"}},"reliability":{"evidence":{"source":"runtime-metrics","verified":false,"confidence":"low","updatedAt":null,"emptyReason":"No trust, reliability, or runtime telemetry is available."},"trust":{"status":"unavailable","handshakeStatus":"UNKNOWN","verificationFreshnessHours":null,"reputationScore":null,"p95LatencyMs":null,"successRate30d":null,"fallbackRate":null,"attempts30d":null,"trustUpdatedAt":null,"trustConfidence":"unknown","sourceUpdatedAt":null,"freshnessSeconds":null},"decisionGuardrails":{"doNotUseIf":["Contract metadata is missing or unavailable for deterministic execution."],"safeUseWhen":[],"riskFlags":["missing_or_unavailable_contract","trust_data_unavailable","schema_references_missing"],"operationalConfidence":"low"},"executionMetrics":{"observedLatencyMsP50":null,"observedLatencyMsP95":null,"estimatedCostUsd":null,"uptime30d":null,"rateLimitRpm":null,"rateLimitBurst":null,"lastVerifiedAt":null,"verificationSource":null},"runtimeMetrics":{"successRate":null,"avgLatencyMs":null,"avgCostUsd":null,"hallucinationRate":null,"retryRate":null,"disputeRate":null,"p50Latency":null,"p95Latency":null,"lastUpdated":null}},"benchmarks":{"evidence":{"source":"no-benchmark-data","verified":false,"confidence":"low","updatedAt":null,"emptyReason":"No benchmark suites or observed failure patterns are available."},"suites":[],"failurePatterns":[]},"artifacts":{"evidence":{"source":"CLAWHUB","verified":false,"confidence":"high","updatedAt":"2026-10-09T15:09:50.835Z","emptyReason":null},"readme":"Skill: Academic Paper\n\nOwner: andyrenxu7255\n\nSummary: 12-agent academic paper writing pipeline on Hermes Agent. 10 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-che...\n\nTags: academic:3.1.3, apa:3.1.3, bilingual:3.1.1, cc-by-nc:3.1.3, citation:3.1.3, hermes:3.1.3, latest:3.1.4, latex:3.1.3, multi-agent:3.1.3, paper-writing:3.1.3, research:3.1.1\n\nVersion history:\n\nv3.1.4 | 2026-05-17T22:54:27.396Z | user\n\n## 3.1.4 — Moderation Re-trigger\n\n- Re-publish to trigger moderation review (skill was stuck with moderation: null)\n- Added ATTRIBUTION.md for license compliance\n- SKILL.md already contains correct CC BY-NC 4.0 license with full attribution to Cheng-I Wu\n\nv3.1.3 | 2026-05-16T15:00:56.219Z | user\n\n## 3.1.3 — ClawScan Compliance\n\n- Removed 'terminal' from all delegate_task toolsets\n- Added Security & Privacy section disclosing multi-agent design\n- Agent files clarified as task instructions, not system overrides\n\nv3.1.2 | 2026-05-16T14:51:09.384Z | user\n\n## 3.1.2 — License Correction\n\n**IMPORTANT:** Corrected license from MIT-0 to **CC BY-NC 4.0** to comply with original author's license.\n\n- Added full attribution to Cheng-I Wu (original creator)\n- Added CC BY-NC 4.0 LICENSE file to distribution\n- Added copyright notice and GitHub link to SKILL.md frontmatter\n- Added 'Adapted for Hermes Agent' modification notice\n\nv3.1.1 | 2026-05-16T14:37:43.506Z | user\n\n## 3.1.1-hermes — Initial release for Hermes Agent\n\nAdapted from imbad0202/academic-research-skills v3.1.1 for Hermes Agent.\n\n**Key Features:**\n- 12-agent paper writing pipeline via delegate_task\n- 10 modes: full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure\n- 6 paper types, 5 citation formats (APA/Chicago/MLA/IEEE/Vancouver)\n- Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN), LaTeX/DOCX/PDF output\n- 25 reference files, 11 templates, 6 examples\n\n**Adaptation:** All agents run through Hermes delegate_task. v3.6.6 Generator-Evaluator contracts preserved. Handoff from deep-research supported.\n\nArchive index:\n\nArchive v3.1.4: 72 files, 344611 bytes\n\nFiles: _meta.json (133b), agents/abstract_bilingual_agent.md (5751b), agents/argument_builder_agent.md (10529b), agents/citation_compliance_agent.md (18502b), agents/draft_writer_agent.md (31221b), agents/formatter_agent.md (32571b), agents/intake_agent.md (10372b), agents/literature_strategist_agent.md (28720b), agents/peer_reviewer_agent.md (28971b), agents/revision_coach_agent.md (12643b), agents/socratic_mentor_agent.md (24915b), agents/structure_architect_agent.md (14877b), agents/visualization_agent.md (15862b), ATTRIBUTION.md (1786b), examples/chinese_paper_example.md (21572b), examples/imrad_hei_example.md (23879b), examples/literature_review_example.md (31541b), examples/plan_mode_guided_writing.md (35170b), examples/revision_mode_example.md (20318b), examples/revision_recovery_example.md (41036b), LICENSE (19584b), references/abstract_writing_guide.md (7981b), references/academic_writing_style.md (7741b), references/anti_leakage_protocol.md (4273b), references/apa7_chinese_citation_guide.md (12510b), references/apa7_extended_guide.md (6725b), references/changelog.md (2821b), references/citation_format_switcher.md (7548b), references/credit_authorship_guide.md (13983b), references/disclosure_mode_protocol.md (12764b), references/failure_paths.md (14163b), references/funding_statement_guide.md (12193b), references/hei_domain_glossary.md (6974b), references/journal_submission_guide.md (8891b), references/latex_template_reference.md (9851b), references/mode_selection_guide.md (12396b), references/paper_structure_patterns.md (8408b), references/plan_mode_protocol.md (4839b), references/policy_anchor_disclosure_protocol.md (20797b), references/policy_anchor_table.md (21692b), references/statistical_visualization_standards.md (24247b), references/venue_disclosure_policies.md (8778b), references/vlm_figure_verification.md (3312b), references/workflow_phase_details.md (3378b), references/writing_judgment_framework.md (3336b), references/writing_quality_check.md (9235b), shared/artifact_reproducibility_pattern.md (8921b), shared/benchmark_report_pattern.md (8988b), shared/benchmark_report.schema.json (2789b), shared/collaboration_depth_rubric.md (10810b), shared/compliance_checkpoint_protocol.md (7175b), shared/compliance_report.schema.json (8314b), shared/cross_model_verification.md (11173b), shared/ground_truth_isolation_pattern.md (12649b), shared/handoff_schemas.md (46013b), shared/mode_spectrum.md (4047b), shared/prisma_trAIce_protocol.md (10415b), shared/raise_framework.md (7365b), shared/sprint_contract.schema.json (18954b), shared/style_calibration_protocol.md (7085b), skill-card.md (3017b), SKILL.md (6149b), templates/bilingual_abstract_template.md (2943b), templates/case_study_template.md (2895b), templates/conference_paper_template.md (2363b), templates/credit_statement_template.md (4476b), templates/funding_statement_template.md (9091b), templates/imrad_template.md (4544b), templates/literature_review_template.md (2896b), templates/policy_brief_template.md (3645b), templates/revision_tracking_template.md (5210b), templates/theoretical_paper_template.md (2913b)\n\nFile v3.1.4:SKILL.md\n\n---\nname: academic-paper\ndescription: \"12-agent academic paper writing pipeline on Hermes Agent. 10 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX/PDF output. Uses delegate_task for each agent. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見.\"\nmetadata:\n  version: \"3.1.1-hermes-1.0\"\n  last_updated: \"2026-05-16\"\n  status: active\n  adapted_from: \"imbad0202/academic-research-skills v3.1.1\"\n  adapted_for: \"Hermes Agent (deepseek-v4-pro)\"\n  task_type: open-ended\n  license: \"CC BY-NC 4.0\"\n  original_author: \"Cheng-I Wu\"\n  original_license: \"CC BY-NC 4.0\"\n  original_repo: \"https://github.com/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills\"\n  copyright: \"Copyright (c) 2026 Cheng-I Wu\"\n---\n# Academic Paper — 12-Agent Writing Pipeline (Hermes Edition)\n\n📄 **License:** [CC BY-NC 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) · Copyright (c) 2026 Cheng-I Wu  \n🔗 **Original:** [Imbad0202/academic-research-skills](https://github.com/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills) v3.1.1  \n🔄 **Adaptation:** Multi-agent pipeline implemented via `delegate_task` instead of Claude Code's internal agent system. All agent definitions, references, templates, and quality standards preserved unchanged from original. **This adaptation is distributed under the same CC BY-NC 4.0 license.**\n\n## Quick Start\n\n```\nWrite a paper on the impact of AI on higher education quality assurance\n```\n\n## Agent Team\n\n| # | Agent | Phase |\n|---|-------|-------|\n| 1 | intake_agent | Phase 0: Config interview |\n| 2 | literature_strategist_agent | Phase 1: Literature search |\n| 3 | structure_architect_agent | Phase 2: Structure/outline |\n| 4 | argument_builder_agent | Phase 3: Argument construction |\n| 5 | draft_writer_agent | Phase 4: Full draft |\n| 6 | citation_compliance_agent | Phase 5a: Citation check |\n| 7 | abstract_bilingual_agent | Phase 5b: Bilingual abstract |\n| 8 | peer_reviewer_agent | Phase 6: Peer review (max 2 loops) |\n| 9 | formatter_agent | Phase 7: Output formatting |\n| 10 | socratic_mentor_agent | Plan mode guide |\n| 11 | visualization_agent | Figures/charts |\n| 12 | revision_coach_agent | Reviewer comment parsing |\n\n## Hermes Execution Pattern\n\nAll phases use `delegate_task`. Agent files at `agents/` loaded as context.\n\n### Phase 0: Configuration\n```\ndelegate_task(goal=\"Conduct paper configuration interview: paper type, discipline, journal, citation format, output format, language, word count.\", context=\"Use agents/intake_agent.md\")\n```\n\n### Phase 1: Literature\n```\ndelegate_task(goal=\"Design search strategy, screen sources, produce annotated bibliography.\", context=\"Use agents/literature_strategist_agent.md\")\n```\n\n### Phase 2: Architecture\n```\ndelegate_task(goal=\"Select paper structure, create detailed outline with word count allocation and evidence mapping.\", context=\"Use agents/structure_architect_agent.md. Reference: references/paper_structure_patterns.md\")\n```\n⚠️ User must approve outline before Phase 3.\n\n### Phase 3: Argumentation\n```\ndelegate_task(goal=\"Build argument blueprint: claim-evidence chains, logical flow, counter-argument handling.\", context=\"Use agents/argument_builder_agent.md\")\n```\n\n### Phase 4: Drafting\n```\ndelegate_task(goal=\"Write full paper draft section by section, maintaining discipline register and word count.\", context=\"Use agents/draft_writer_agent.md. Reference: references/writing_quality_check.md\")\n```\n\n### Phase 5: Citations + Abstract (parallel)\n```\ndelegate_task(tasks=[\n    {\"goal\": \"Verify all citations: format compliance, reference list completeness, DOI checking.\", \"context\": \"Use agents/citation_compliance_agent.md\", \"toolsets\": [\"file\"]},\n    {\"goal\": \"Write bilingual abstract (zh-TW + EN) with 5-7 keywords each. Independent composition, not translation.\", \"context\": \"Use agents/abstract_bilingual_agent.md. Reference: references/abstract_writing_guide.md\", \"toolsets\": [\"file\"]}\n])\n```\n\n### Phase 6: Peer Review\n```\ndelegate_task(goal=\"Simulated double-blind review on 5 dimensions: Originality(20%), Method Rigor(25%), Evidence(25%), Argument(15%), Writing(15%). Max 2 loops.\", context=\"Use agents/peer_reviewer_agent.md\")\n```\n\n### Phase 7: Format\n```\ndelegate_task(goal=\"Convert to target format (LaTeX/DOCX/PDF/Markdown). Apply journal formatting. Generate cover letter.\", context=\"Use agents/formatter_agent.md. Reference: references/latex_template_reference.md\")\n```\n\n## 10 Modes\n\n| Mode | Trigger | Agents |\n|------|---------|--------|\n| `full` | \"Write a paper\" | All 9 core |\n| `outline-only` | \"Paper outline\" | 1→2→3 |\n| `revision` | \"Revise paper\" | 8→5→6 |\n| `abstract-only` | \"Write abstract\" | 1→7 |\n| `lit-review` | \"Literature review\" | 1→2 |\n| `format-convert` | \"Convert to LaTeX\" | 9 only |\n| `citation-check` | \"Check citations\" | 6 only |\n| `plan` | \"Guide my paper\" | 1→10→3→4 |\n| `revision-coach` | \"Parse reviews\" | 12 only |\n| `disclosure` | \"AI disclosure statement\" | 9 only |\n\n## Critical Rules\n1. ⚠️ User must confirm Paper Configuration Record before Phase 1\n2. ⚠️ Max 2 revision loops; unresolved → Acknowledged Limitations\n3. ⚠️ Every claim must have a citation or be from paper's own data\n4. ⚠️ Zero fabricated citations — every reference verified via DOI\n\n## Handoff from deep-research\n`intake_agent` auto-detects deep-research materials (RQ Brief, Bibliography, Synthesis) and skips redundant steps.\n\n## Security & Privacy\n\n**Multi-agent design disclosure:** This skill delegates writing tasks across multiple subagents. Paper content is processed through the AI provider's delegated-agent workflow. Use only with content you are comfortable having processed by AI.\n\n**Tool access:** Subagents are granted only `file` tools for reading/writing paper drafts. No terminal, web, or system tools are exposed.\n\n**Agent files:** The `agents/` directory contains academic writing prompt templates. These are task instructions for `delegate_task` — NOT system prompt overrides.\n\nFile v3.1.4:_meta.json\n\n{\n  \"ownerId\": \"kn725tchg3gp72a78w22qa07p584f267\",\n  \"slug\": \"academic-paper\",\n  \"version\": \"3.1.4\",\n  \"publishedAt\": 1779058467396\n}\n\nFile v3.1.4:references/abstract_writing_guide.md\n\n# Abstract Writing Guide\n\nUsed by `abstract_bilingual_agent`.\n\n## Abstract Types\n\n### Structured Abstract\nContains explicit labeled sections. Required by many journals in social sciences and medicine.\n\n**Sections**: Background, Purpose/Objective, Method, Results/Findings, Conclusion/Implications\n\n### Unstructured Abstract\nA single flowing paragraph without labels. Common in humanities and some social sciences.\n\n**Flow**: Context → Problem → Purpose → Method → Key Findings → Implications\n\n### Extended Abstract\nLonger (500-1,000 words), used for conference submissions. May include brief literature review and preliminary results.\n\n## English Abstract Guidelines\n\n### Word Count\n- Standard: 150-250 words (check journal requirements)\n- Conference: 200-500 words (check CFP)\n- Dissertation: up to 350 words\n\n### Structure (5-Component Model)\n\n#### Component 1: Background (1-2 sentences)\nEstablish context and identify the problem.\n\n**Patterns**:\n- \"[Topic] has become increasingly important because...\"\n- \"Despite growing interest in [topic], little is known about...\"\n- \"Recent developments in [field] have raised questions about...\"\n\n**Avoid**:\n- Starting with \"This paper...\" (too abrupt)\n- Generic statements (\"Education is important\")\n- Overly long historical context\n\n#### Component 2: Purpose (1 sentence)\nState the specific objective or research question.\n\n**Patterns**:\n- \"This study examines [what] in [context].\"\n- \"The purpose of this research is to [verb] [object].\"\n- \"This paper proposes [framework/model] for [application].\"\n\n#### Component 3: Method (1-2 sentences)\nDescribe the approach, data, and analysis.\n\n**Patterns**:\n- \"Using [method], this study analyzed [data] from [source].\"\n- \"A [design] approach was employed, involving [participants/data].\"\n- \"Data were collected through [instrument] and analyzed using [technique].\"\n\n#### Component 4: Findings (2-3 sentences)\nPresent the key results — be specific.\n\n**Patterns**:\n- \"The results indicate that [finding 1]. Additionally, [finding 2].\"\n- \"Three key findings emerged: (a) [finding 1], (b) [finding 2], and (c) [finding 3].\"\n- \"The analysis revealed [main finding], with [specific metric/detail].\"\n\n**Include**:\n- Specific numbers when available (percentages, effect sizes)\n- The most important findings (not all findings)\n\n**Avoid**:\n- \"Results will be discussed\" (the abstract IS the discussion)\n- Vague findings (\"significant results were found\")\n\n#### Component 5: Implications (1-2 sentences)\nState the significance, practical implications, or recommendations.\n\n**Patterns**:\n- \"These findings have implications for [practice/policy/theory].\"\n- \"The results suggest that [stakeholders] should [action].\"\n- \"This research contributes to [field] by [contribution].\"\n\n### Example (English, Education)\n\n> Declining enrollment poses existential challenges for private higher education institutions in Taiwan, yet institutional responses remain poorly understood. This study examines the strategic adaptation patterns of 12 private universities experiencing enrollment declines exceeding 20% between 2018 and 2023. Using a multiple case study design, we analyzed institutional documents, enrollment data, and 36 semi-structured interviews with administrators. Three distinct adaptation strategies emerged: program consolidation (n = 5), niche specialization (n = 4), and merger pursuit (n = 3). Institutions adopting niche specialization demonstrated the highest enrollment recovery rates (mean = 12.3%). However, successful adaptation was contingent upon early action — institutions that initiated strategic changes within two years of enrollment decline showed significantly better outcomes than late movers (p < .01). These findings suggest that private institutions should adopt proactive monitoring systems and consider niche specialization as a primary survival strategy.\n>\n> **Keywords**: higher education, enrollment decline, private universities, institutional strategy, Taiwan\n\n## Traditional Chinese Abstract Guidelines\n\n### Word Count\n- Standard: 300-500 characters\n- Conference: 300-800 characters\n- Dissertation: 500-1,000 characters\n\n### Structure (5-Component Model)\n\n#### Component 1: Research Background (1-2 sentences)\n**Patterns**:\n- \"As... has become an important issue for...\"\n- \"In the context of..., ... faces the challenge of...\"\n- \"Although... has received widespread attention, ... still lacks systematic research.\"\n\n#### Component 2: Research Purpose (1 sentence)\n**Patterns**:\n- \"This study aims to explore...\"\n- \"This paper takes... as subjects and analyzes the impact of...\"\n- \"The purpose of this study is to construct a framework for...\"\n\n#### Component 3: Research Method (1-2 sentences)\n**Patterns**:\n- \"This study employs... research method, with... as subjects, collecting data through...\"\n- \"Using... to analyze... data.\"\n\n#### Component 4: Research Findings (2-3 sentences)\n**Patterns**:\n- \"The results found: (1)...; (2)...; (3)...\"\n- \"The analysis results show that... Furthermore,...\"\n\n#### Component 5: Research Significance (1-2 sentences)\n**Patterns**:\n- \"This study has both theoretical and practical contributions to...\"\n- \"The results can serve as a reference for... and provide specific recommendations for...\"\n\n### Example (Chinese, Higher Education Field)\n\n> Amid the trend of declining birth rates, Taiwan's private universities face enrollment difficulties, yet existing research on institutional response strategies remains limited. This study aims to explore the strategic adaptation patterns of 12 private universities that experienced enrollment declines exceeding 20% between 2018 and 2023. The study employs a multiple case study design, analyzing institutional development plans, enrollment data, and conducting 36 semi-structured interviews with administrators. Three primary adaptation strategies were identified: program consolidation (5 institutions), niche specialization (4 institutions), and merger pursuit (3 institutions). Among these, institutions adopting niche specialization demonstrated the highest enrollment recovery rates (mean = 12.3%). The study also found that timing of adaptation is critical to success -- institutions that initiated strategic adjustments within two years of enrollment decline showed significantly better outcomes than late movers. The results suggest that private universities should establish proactive monitoring mechanisms and adopt niche specialization as a primary sustainability strategy.\n>\n> **Keywords**: higher education, enrollment decline, private university, institutional strategy, Taiwan\n\n## Keywords Selection\n\n### English Keywords\n1. **Core concepts** — main variables or constructs (2-3)\n2. **Context** — geographical, institutional, or temporal (1-2)\n3. **Method** — if distinctive (0-1)\n4. **Field** — discipline or sub-field (1)\n\n**Rules**:\n- Lowercase (unless proper nouns)\n- Complement the title (don't repeat title words verbatim)\n- Use established terms (check journal's keyword list if available)\n- 5-7 keywords total\n\n### Chinese Keywords\n1. **Core concepts** — main variables or constructs (2-3)\n2. **Research context** — geographical, institutional, or temporal (1-2)\n3. **Research method** — if distinctive (0-1)\n4. **Academic field** — discipline or sub-field (1)\n\n**Rules**:\n- Use formal academic terminology\n- Avoid completely duplicating the title\n- May reference the National Central Library Chinese Subject Headings\n- 5-7 keywords\n\n## Bilingual Abstract Quality Checklist\n\n| Check | ✓ |\n|-------|---|\n| Both abstracts cover all 5 components | |\n| English: 150-300 words | |\n| Chinese: 300-500 characters | |\n| Abstracts are independently written (not translated) | |\n| Key findings match between languages | |\n| Quantitative data consistent between versions | |\n| Keywords: 5-7 per language | |\n| Keywords complement (not duplicate) the title | |\n| No citations in the abstract | |\n| No abbreviations undefined in the abstract | |\n\nFile v3.1.4:references/academic_writing_style.md\n\n# Academic Writing Style Guide\n\nUsed by `draft_writer_agent` and `peer_reviewer_agent`.\n\n## Core Principles\n\n### 1. Precision\n- Use the most specific term available\n- Define technical terms on first use\n- Avoid ambiguous pronouns (\"this,\" \"it\") without clear antecedents\n\n### 2. Conciseness\n- Eliminate filler words and redundant phrases\n- One idea per sentence (or clearly connected ideas)\n- Prefer short sentences for complex ideas\n\n### 3. Objectivity\n- Base claims on evidence, not opinion\n- Use hedging for uncertain claims\n- Acknowledge limitations and alternative interpretations\n\n### 4. Formality\n- Use full forms (\"do not\" over \"don't\")\n- Use formal academic vocabulary; reserve colloquialisms and slang for informal writing\n- Use third person unless discipline conventions allow first person\n\n## Register Adjustment by Discipline\n\n### Sciences (Natural, Applied)\n```\nRegister: Formal, impersonal, method-focused\nVoice: Passive voice common (\"was measured,\" \"were analyzed\")\nTerminology: Precise measurements, SI units, statistical notation\nExample: \"The sample was heated to 350°C for 2 hours, yielding a conversion rate of 87.3% (SD = 2.1).\"\n```\n\n### Social Sciences\n```\nRegister: Formal, theory-informed, participant-aware\nVoice: Active voice encouraged, first person for researcher decisions\nTerminology: Theoretical constructs, operationalized variables\nExample: \"We employed semi-structured interviews to explore how participants understood institutional change (N = 24).\"\n```\n\n### Humanities\n```\nRegister: Formal, argument-driven, interpretive\nVoice: First person acceptable for arguments, active voice\nTerminology: Close reading vocabulary, theoretical language\nExample: \"I argue that the text's spatial metaphors reveal an underlying anxiety about institutional permanence.\"\n```\n\n### Engineering / CS\n```\nRegister: Formal, problem-solution oriented, specification-precise\nVoice: Passive common for methods, active for contributions\nTerminology: Technical specifications, performance metrics\nExample: \"The proposed algorithm achieves O(n log n) complexity, outperforming the baseline by 34% on the benchmark dataset.\"\n```\n\n### Education\n```\nRegister: Formal, practice-oriented, stakeholder-aware\nVoice: Active voice, first person for reflexive practice\nTerminology: Pedagogical concepts, assessment language\nExample: \"The intervention improved student metacognitive awareness, as evidenced by a significant increase in self-regulation scores (t(45) = 3.21, p = .002, d = 0.72).\"\n```\n\n### Medicine / Health\n```\nRegister: Formal, evidence-hierarchy conscious, clinical precision\nVoice: Passive for methods, active for findings\nTerminology: Clinical terms, diagnostic criteria, statistical reporting\nExample: \"Patients receiving the intervention showed a 40% reduction in readmission rates (RR = 0.60, 95% CI [0.45, 0.80], p = .001).\"\n```\n\n## Hedging and Strength Language\n\n### Hedging (for uncertain or qualified claims)\n| Strength | Hedging Devices | Example |\n|----------|----------------|---------|\n| Weak | may, might, could, possibly | \"This may suggest a correlation.\" |\n| Moderate | suggests, indicates, appears | \"The data suggest a positive trend.\" |\n| Strong | demonstrates, establishes, confirms | \"The evidence demonstrates a clear link.\" |\n\n### When to Hedge\n- Results that need replication\n- Causal claims from correlational data\n- Generalizations from limited samples\n- Interpretations with alternative explanations\n\n### When NOT to Hedge\n- Reporting factual data: \"The response rate was 78%.\" (not \"appeared to be\")\n- Describing methodology: \"We used thematic analysis.\" (not \"we attempted to use\")\n- Well-established facts: \"Earth orbits the Sun.\" (not \"may orbit\")\n\n## Transition Words and Phrases\n\n### Addition\nmoreover, furthermore, in addition, additionally, similarly, likewise\n\n### Contrast\nhowever, nevertheless, in contrast, on the other hand, conversely, whereas\n\n### Cause/Effect\ntherefore, consequently, as a result, thus, hence, accordingly\n\n### Example\nfor example, for instance, specifically, in particular, such as, namely\n\n### Sequence\nfirst, second, third, subsequently, finally, meanwhile\n\n### Summary\nin summary, to conclude, overall, taken together, in short\n\n### Concession\nalthough, despite, while, granted that, notwithstanding\n\n## Paragraph Construction\n\n### Standard Academic Paragraph (TEEL)\n1. **T**opic sentence — states the paragraph's main point\n2. **E**vidence — data, citations, examples that support the point\n3. **E**xplanation — interpret the evidence, connect to argument\n4. **L**ink — connect to the next paragraph or back to thesis\n\n### Example\n> **[T]** AI-assisted quality assurance has shown promise in improving evaluation consistency across institutions. **[E]** Smith (2024) found that institutions using AI tools reported a 23% reduction in inter-rater variance, while Chen and Wang (2023) documented improved agreement on scoring rubrics (κ = 0.82 vs. 0.64). **[E]** These findings suggest that algorithmic assistance can mitigate the subjective biases inherent in human evaluation, particularly when assessors have varying levels of experience. **[L]** However, the reliance on AI tools also raises concerns about the loss of contextual judgment, which the following section addresses.\n\n## Common Style Errors\n\n### Wordiness\n| Wordy | Concise |\n|-------|---------|\n| in order to | to |\n| due to the fact that | because |\n| a large number of | many |\n| at the present time | currently / now |\n| it is important to note that | notably |\n| in the event that | if |\n| has the ability to | can |\n| with regard to | regarding / about |\n| in spite of the fact that | despite / although |\n| conduct an investigation of | investigate |\n\n### Vague Language\n| Vague | Precise |\n|-------|---------|\n| \"many studies\" | \"several studies (e.g., Chen, 2023; Smith, 2024)\" |\n| \"a significant impact\" | \"a 23% increase in retention rates\" |\n| \"in recent years\" | \"since 2020\" or \"over the past five years\" |\n| \"some researchers\" | Name them with citations |\n| \"it is well known that\" | Cite the source or remove |\n\n### Tense Usage\n| Section | Tense | Example |\n|---------|-------|---------|\n| Literature review (reporting findings) | Past | \"Smith (2024) found that...\" |\n| Literature review (ongoing state) | Present | \"The theory posits that...\" |\n| Methodology | Past | \"Data were collected through...\" |\n| Results | Past | \"The analysis revealed...\" |\n| Discussion (interpreting) | Present | \"These findings suggest...\" |\n| Conclusion (implications) | Present/Future | \"This has implications for... / Future research should...\" |\n\n## Chinese Academic Writing (zh-TW) Conventions\n\n### Register\n- Use written/formal language; avoid colloquial expressions\n- Prefer active voice (Chinese rarely uses passive)\n- Mainly short sentences; avoid overly long subordinate clauses\n- Use \"this study\" (ben yan jiu) rather than \"we\" (wo men)\n\n### Common Academic Expressions\n| English | Romanized Chinese |\n|------|------|\n| This study aims to | Ben Yan Jiu Zhi Zai |\n| The findings indicate | Yan Jiu Jie Guo Xian Shi |\n| It is worth noting | Zhi De Zhu Yi De Shi |\n| In conclusion | Zong Shang Suo Shu |\n| Based on the above analysis | Gen Ju Shang Shu Fen Xi |\n| Further research is needed | Wei Lai Yan Jiu Ke Jin Yi Bu Tan Tao |\n\n### Avoiding Translationese\n- Incorrect: \"was found to be\" (bei fa xian shi) → Correct: \"Results show\" (jie guo xian shi)\n- Incorrect: \"This is because\" (zhe shi yin wei) → Correct: \"The reason lies in\" (yuan yin zai yu)\n- Incorrect: \"In the aspect of...\" (zai...fang mian) → Correct: State directly\n- Incorrect: \"It is worth being pointed out that\" (zhi de bei zhi chu de shi) → Correct: \"It is worth noting that\" (zhi de zhu yi de shi)\n\nFile v3.1.4:references/anti_leakage_protocol.md\n\n# Anti-Leakage Protocol (Knowledge Isolation)\n\n**Status**: v3.3\n**Used by**: `draft_writer_agent`, `report_compiler_agent`\n**Source**: Adapted from PaperOrchestra (Song et al., 2026, Appendix D.4)\n\n---\n\n## Purpose\n\nWhen the user provides comprehensive research materials (RQ Brief, Synthesis Report, Annotated Bibliography, experimental data), the writing agent should construct the paper **primarily from those materials**, not from LLM parametric memory. This prevents:\n\n1. **Methodology fabrication (Failure Mode 6)**: The LLM writes a plausible Methods section from training data rather than the user's actual procedure\n2. **Implicit knowledge leakage**: The LLM fills gaps with memorized content that may be inaccurate, outdated, or from a different context\n3. **Unintentional plagiarism**: The LLM reproduces near-verbatim passages from training data\n\n---\n\n## Protocol\n\n### When to activate\n\nActivate when ALL of the following are true:\n- The user has provided research materials via the pipeline handoff (RQ Brief + Synthesis Report + Annotated Bibliography)\n- The paper is in `full` or `revision` mode (not `plan` or `outline-only`)\n- The materials are substantive (not placeholder stubs)\n\n### When NOT to activate\n\nDo NOT activate when:\n- The user is in `plan` or `socratic` mode (exploratory — LLM knowledge is expected)\n- The materials are minimal (e.g., only a RQ Brief with no bibliography)\n- The user explicitly requests the LLM to supplement with its own knowledge\n\n### Prompt insertion\n\nWhen activated, prepend the following to the draft_writer_agent's working context:\n\n```\n## Knowledge Isolation Directive\n\nYou are writing this paper based on the research materials provided in this session:\n- RQ Brief, Synthesis Report, and Annotated Bibliography (from deep-research)\n- Any additional materials the user has provided (experimental logs, datasets, prior drafts)\n\nPriority rules:\n1. PREFER session materials over your parametric knowledge for all factual claims\n2. Every claim in the paper MUST be traceable to a source in the Annotated Bibliography or user-provided data\n3. If the materials do not cover a topic the outline requires, flag it as [MATERIAL GAP] rather than filling from memory\n4. Do NOT introduce references not present in the Annotated Bibliography unless explicitly asked by the user\n5. The Methods section must describe ONLY what is documented in the user's materials — do not infer or interpolate experimental procedures\n\nThis is NOT a prohibition on using language skills or academic writing knowledge.\nYou may use your knowledge of academic conventions, writing style, logical argumentation,\nand discipline norms. The restriction applies only to FACTUAL CONTENT — claims, citations,\ndata, and methodology descriptions must come from session materials.\n```\n\n### [MATERIAL GAP] handling\n\n> **Tag vocabulary.** The `[MATERIAL GAP]`, `[WEAK EVIDENCE]`, `[GAP]` tags used throughout this protocol are canonically defined in [`shared/compliance_checkpoint_protocol.md#canonical-gap-tag-vocabulary`](../../shared/compliance_checkpoint_protocol.md#canonical-gap-tag-vocabulary). This section describes how the anti-leakage writing-time flag interacts with that vocabulary during manuscript production.\n\nWhen a `[MATERIAL GAP]` is flagged:\n1. The gap is surfaced at the next checkpoint\n2. The user can provide additional materials, or authorize LLM supplementation for that specific gap\n3. If supplemented: the gap section is tagged `[LLM-SUPPLEMENTED]` in the draft metadata for integrity review\n\n---\n\n## Relationship to existing checks\n\n| Check | What it catches | Anti-leakage adds |\n|-------|----------------|-------------------|\n| Integrity gate (Stage 2.5) | Fabricated citations post-hoc | Prevents fabrication at writing time |\n| Failure Mode 6 (Methodology fabrication) | Methods don't match actual procedures | Prevents LLM from inventing procedures |\n| Writing Quality Check | AI-typical phrasing patterns | Anti-leakage prevents AI-typical *content* (as opposed to style) |\n\n---\n\n## References\n\n- Song, Y. et al. (2026). PaperOrchestra. *arXiv:2604.05018*. Appendix D.4 (Anti-Leakage Prompt).\n- Lu, C. et al. (2026). Towards end-to-end automation of AI research. *Nature* 651, 914-919. — Mode 6 (Methodology fabrication).\n\nFile v3.1.4:references/apa7_chinese_citation_guide.md\n\n# APA 7.0 Complete Guide for Chinese Citations\n\nA Chinese APA 7.0 citation format guide based on Taiwan academic conventions. This guide is a Chinese-language extension of `apa7_extended_guide.md`, used by `citation_compliance_agent`, `draft_writer_agent`, and `formatter_agent`.\n\n---\n\n## Chinese Journal Articles\n\n### Basic Format\n\n```\nAuthor1, Author2 (Year). Article title. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx\n```\n\n### Examples\n\n**Single author**:\n```\nWang, Da-Ming (2024). The impact of declining birthrate on private university management strategies. Journal of Higher Education, 15(2), 45-68. https://doi.org/10.6152/jhe.2024.0502.03\n```\n\n**Two authors**:\n```\nWang, Da-Ming, & Li, Xiao-Hua (2024). The evolution and prospects of Taiwan's higher education quality assurance system. Bulletin of Educational Research, 70(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.3966/102887082024037001001\n```\n\n**Three or more authors**:\n```\nWang, Da-Ming, Li, Xiao-Hua, Zhang, San-Feng, Chen, Si-Hai, & Lin, Wu-Zhou (2023). A meta-analysis of blended learning models on university student learning outcomes. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 55(2), 201-228. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202312_55(2).0002\n```\n\n**In-text citations**:\n- Single author: Wang (2024) states... / ...(Wang, 2024)\n- Two authors: Wang and Li (2024)... / ...(Wang & Li, 2024)\n- Three or more (first time): Wang et al. (2023)... / ...(Wang et al., 2023)\n- Three or more (subsequent): Wang et al. (2023)...\n\n---\n\n## Chinese Books\n\n### Basic Format\n\n```\nAuthor (Year). Book title. Publisher.\n```\n\n### Examples\n\n**Single author**:\n```\nZhang, San (2023). A history of Taiwan's higher education development. Wu-Nan Books.\n```\n\n**Edited book**:\n```\nWang, Wu (Ed.) (2023). Higher education quality management: Theory and practice. Higher Education Publishing.\n```\n\n**Multiple editions**:\n```\nLin, Liu (2024). Educational research methods (5th ed.). Psychological Publishing.\n```\n\n**Translated book**:\n```\nCreswell, J. W. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (F.-F. Zhang, Trans.; 5th ed.). Scholarly Cultural Enterprise. (Original work published 2018)\n```\n\n**In-text citations**:\n- Zhang (2023) mentions in his work...\n- ...(Zhang, 2023, p. 45-48)\n- Translated book: Creswell (2018/2023)...\n\n---\n\n## Chinese Book Chapters\n\n### Basic Format\n\n```\nChapter author (Year). Chapter title. In Editor name (Ed.), Book title (pp. Pages). Publisher.\n```\n\n### Examples\n\n```\nLi, Si (2023). The evolution of quality assurance systems. In W. Wang (Ed.), Higher education quality management: Theory and practice (pp. 45-78). Higher Education Publishing.\n```\n\n```\nChen, Mei-Ling (2024). The practice of university social responsibility. In Z.-C. Lin & S.-L. Huang (Eds.), New trends in Taiwan's university governance (pp. 112-145). Wu-Nan Books.\n```\n\n---\n\n## Chinese Theses and Dissertations\n\n### Basic Format\n\n```\nAuthor (Year). Thesis title (Unpublished master's/doctoral dissertation). University name.\n```\n\n### Examples\n\n**Unpublished thesis/dissertation**:\n```\nChen, Liu (2024). The impact of AI-assisted instruction on student learning outcomes: A case study of National Taiwan University (Unpublished master's thesis). National Taiwan University.\n```\n\n**Published (with DOI or database)**:\n```\nHuang, Qi (2023). A case study of private university transformation strategies (Doctoral dissertation, National Chengchi University). National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/xxxxx\n```\n\n**In-text citations**:\n- Chen (2024) found in their study...\n- ...(Chen, 2024)\n\n---\n\n## Government Publications\n\n### Basic Format\n\n```\nOrganization name (Year). Publication title. https://url\n```\n\n### Examples\n\n**Government report**:\n```\nMinistry of Education (2024). Academic Year 113 higher education institution transparency platform statistics. https://udb.moe.edu.tw/\n```\n\n**Legislation**:\n```\nMinistry of Education (2023). University Act (amended June 28, 2023). Laws and Regulations Database of the Republic of China. https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0030001\n```\n\n**Accreditation report**:\n```\nHigher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan (2024). Third-cycle institutional accreditation implementation plan (Academic Years 112-114). https://www.heeact.edu.tw/\n```\n\n**In-text citations**:\n- Ministry of Education (2024) statistics show...\n- ...(Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan, 2024)\n\n---\n\n## Conference Papers\n\n### Basic Format\n\n```\nAuthor (Year, Month). Paper title [Conference paper]. Conference name, Location.\n```\n\n### Examples\n\n```\nLin, Ba (2024, November). The impact of generative AI on higher education teaching [Conference paper]. 2024 Taiwan Education Academic Conference, Taipei, Taiwan.\n```\n\n---\n\n## Online Resources\n\n### Basic Format\n\n```\nAuthor or organization (Year). Webpage title. Website name. https://url\n```\n\n### Examples\n\n```\nNational Development Council (2024). Population projections (2024 to 2070). https://pop-proj.ndc.gov.tw/\n```\n\n```\nUniversity TW (2024, March 15). Analysis of Academic Year 113 university admission quotas. University TW website. https://www.unews.com.tw/\n```\n\n---\n\n## Mixed Chinese-English Citation Rules\n\n### Reference List Ordering\n\n**Option A (Recommended): Separate Chinese and English**\n- Chinese references listed first, ordered by author surname stroke count\n- English references listed after, ordered alphabetically by author surname\n- Separated by two headings: \"Chinese References\" and \"English References\"\n\n**Option B: Mixed Chinese-English Ordering**\n- All Chinese and English references listed together\n- Chinese ordered by stroke count, English by alphabetical order\n- Chinese entries placed at the corresponding phonetic/pinyin letter position (or all Chinese first)\n\n### In-Text Citation Format Differences\n\n| Element | Chinese | English |\n|------|------|------|\n| Parentheses | Full-width () | Half-width () |\n| Multiple author connector | Enumeration comma | & |\n| Three or more authors | et al. (Chinese equivalent) | et al. |\n| Year format | CE year | CE year |\n| Direct quote page | p. (Chinese format) | p. 45 |\n| Multi-page quote | pp. (Chinese format) | pp. 45-48 |\n\n### Mixed Citation Example (In-Text)\n\n```\nIn recent years, the impact of declining birthrates on Taiwan's higher education has received widespread attention (Wang, 2024; Chen & Wang, 2023).\nSmith et al. (2024) and Wang et al. (2023) both indicated that private universities face particularly severe enrollment pressure.\n```\n\n### Mixed Reference List Example (Option A)\n\n```\nReferences\n\nI. Chinese References\n\nWang, Da-Ming (2024). The impact of declining birthrate on private university management strategies. Journal of Higher Education, 15(2), 45-68.\n    https://doi.org/10.6152/jhe.2024.0502.03\nLi, Xiao-Hua, & Zhang, San-Feng (2023). The evolution of Taiwan's higher education quality assurance system. Educational Policy Forum, 26(3), 1-30.\nHigher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan (2024). Third-cycle institutional accreditation implementation plan.\n    https://www.heeact.edu.tw/\nMinistry of Education (2024). Academic Year 113 higher education institution transparency platform statistics. https://udb.moe.edu.tw/\n\nII. English References\n\nChen, L., & Wang, T. (2023). Quality assurance in East Asian higher education: A\n    comparative study. Higher Education, 85(3), 567-589.\n    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01012-4\nSmith, J. A., Jones, B. C., & Brown, D. E. (2024). The impact of declining birth\n    rates on private university sustainability. Studies in Higher Education, 49(2),\n    234-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2301234\n```\n\n---\n\n## TSSCI Journal-Specific Conventions\n\nSome Taiwan Social Sciences Citation Index (TSSCI) journals have their own citation format requirements.\n\n### Common Education Journal Format Comparison\n\n| Journal | Citation Format | Special Requirements |\n|------|---------|---------|\n| Bulletin of Educational Research | APA 7th Chinese edition | Separate Chinese and English |\n| Bulletin of Educational Psychology | APA 7th Chinese edition | Separate Chinese and English; English translation of Chinese references required |\n| Journal of Research in Education Sciences | APA 7th Chinese edition | Separate Chinese and English |\n| Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly | APA 7th Chinese edition | Mixed Chinese-English ordering |\n| Educational Policy Forum | APA 7th Chinese edition | Separate Chinese and English; page format uses Chinese page notation |\n| Journal of Higher Education | APA 7th Chinese edition | Separate Chinese and English |\n| Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education | APA 7th Chinese edition | Separate Chinese and English |\n\n### Submission Notes\n\n1. **Always check the target journal's submission guidelines** — the above are general conventions only\n2. Some journals require English translations appended to Chinese references (in square brackets)\n3. Some journals require romanized transliteration for all Chinese references\n4. DOI format varies slightly by journal (some require https://doi.org/, others only doi:)\n\n---\n\n## Common Chinese Citation Errors\n\n### 1. Author Name Format\n\n| Error | Correct | Explanation |\n|------|------|------|\n| Da-Ming Wang (2024) | Wang, Da-Ming (2024) | Chinese names should follow the citation format conventions |\n| Wang, Da-Ming (2024) in English format | Use Chinese name in Chinese references | Use Chinese names for Chinese references |\n| Wang, Li (2024) without separator | Wang & Li (2024) | Use appropriate connector between authors |\n\n### 2. Year Format\n\n| Error | Correct | Explanation |\n|------|------|------|\n| Wang (ROC Year 113) | Wang (2024) | APA always uses CE years |\n| Wang (2024 year) | Wang (2024) | Do not add the word \"year\" after the number |\n| Wang, 2024 without parentheses | Wang (2024) | Use proper parentheses |\n\n### 3. Punctuation\n\n| Error | Correct | Explanation |\n|------|------|------|\n| Period after journal name | Comma after journal name | Use comma after journal name to connect to volume/issue |\n| \"p.\" before page numbers in journal articles | Page numbers only | Do not add page indicator before page numbers in journal article references |\n| Period after DOI/URL | No punctuation after DOI/URL | No period at the end of DOI/URL |\n\n### 4. Book Publication Information\n\n| Error | Correct | Explanation |\n|------|------|------|\n| Taipei: Publisher. | Publisher. | APA 7 does not require publication location |\n| Abbreviated publisher name | Full publisher name. | Use the publisher's full name |\n\n### 5. Translated Book Citations\n\n| Error | Correct |\n|------|------|\n| Creswell, translated by Zhang (2023) | Creswell, J. W. (2023). Book title (F.-F. Zhang, Trans.; 5th ed.). Publisher. (Original work published 2018) |\n\n---\n\n## Special Situation Handling\n\n### Same Author, Multiple Works in the Same Year\n\n```\nIn-text: Wang (2024a)... Wang (2024b)...\n\nReferences:\nWang (2024a). First paper title. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Pages.\nWang (2024b). Second paper title. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Pages.\n```\n\n### Institutional Authors\n\n```\nIn-text: Ministry of Education (2024)... / ...(Ministry of Education, 2024)\nFirst mention: Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan [HEEACT] (2024)...\nSubsequent: HEEACT (2024)...\n```\n\n### Secondary Citations (Indirect Citations)\n\n```\nIn-text: Wang's research (as cited in Li, 2024) indicates...\nReferences: Only list Li (2024); do not list Wang's original work\n```\n\n### Citing AI-Generated Content\n\n```\nOpenAI (2024). ChatGPT (Version GPT-4) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com\n\nAnthropic (2024). Claude (Version 3.5 Sonnet) [Large language model]. https://claude.ai\n```\n\n---\n\n## Quick Checklist\n\nAfter completing the reference list, check each item:\n\n- [ ] All in-text citations have corresponding reference list entries\n- [ ] All reference list entries have in-text citations\n- [ ] Chinese uses full-width punctuation; English uses half-width punctuation\n- [ ] Authors are connected with enumeration comma (Chinese) or & symbol (English)\n- [ ] Years consistently use CE years\n- [ ] No period at the end of DOI/URL\n- [ ] Chinese and English reference ordering is correct (stroke count / alphabetical)\n- [ ] Translated books include original publication year\n- [ ] Institutional authors use full names (abbreviation may be appended on first mention)\n- [ ] Book format complies with APA 7 (no publication location)\n\nFile v3.1.4:references/apa7_extended_guide.md\n\n# APA 7th Edition — Extended Guide for Academic Paper Writing\n\nExtends `deep-research/references/apa7_style_guide.md` with additional rules specific to full paper writing (vs. research reports).\n\n## Paper-Specific APA Rules\n\n### Title Page (Student vs. Professional)\n\n**Professional Paper**:\n```\nTitle of Paper (Bold, Centered, Title Case)\n[blank line]\nAuthor Name(s)\nAffiliation(s)\n[blank line]\nAuthor Note (optional)\n```\n\n**Student Paper**:\n```\nTitle of Paper (Bold, Centered, Title Case)\n[blank line]\nAuthor Name\nDepartment, Institution\nCourse Number: Course Name\nInstructor Name\nDue Date\n```\n\n### Running Head\n- Professional papers: shortened title (max 50 chars), ALL CAPS, left-aligned header\n- Student papers: no running head required (APA 7 change from 6th ed.)\n\n### Abstract Page\n- Heading: \"Abstract\" (centered, bold, not indented)\n- Single paragraph, no indent\n- 150-250 words (journal may specify differently)\n- Keywords line: \"Keywords:\" in italics, followed by lowercase keywords separated by commas\n\n### Section Headings (Detailed)\n\n| Level | Format | Example |\n|-------|--------|---------|\n| 1 | Centered, Bold, Title Case | **Introduction** |\n| 2 | Left-Aligned, Bold, Title Case | **Theoretical Framework** |\n| 3 | Left-Aligned, Bold Italic, Title Case | ***Constructivist Perspective*** |\n| 4 | Indented, Bold, Title Case, Period. | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;**Social Constructivism.** Text continues... |\n| 5 | Indented, Bold Italic, Title Case, Period. | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;***Vygotsky's Zone.*** Text continues... |\n\n**Usage rules**:\n- Don't skip levels (e.g., don't go from Level 1 to Level 3)\n- Introduction doesn't need a Level 1 heading (it's assumed)\n- Subsections need at least 2 sibling sections\n\n## Extended Citation Rules\n\n### Works with 21+ Authors\nList first 19 authors, then \"...\" (ellipsis), then final author:\n```\nAuthor, A., Author, B., Author, C., Author, D., Author, E.,\nAuthor, F., Author, G., Author, H., Author, I., Author, J.,\nAuthor, K., Author, L., Author, M., Author, N., Author, O.,\nAuthor, P., Author, Q., Author, R., Author, S., ... Author, Z. (Year).\n```\n\n### Group Authors\n- First citation: Full name (Abbreviation) — e.g., World Health Organization (WHO)\n- Subsequent: Abbreviation only — e.g., WHO\n- In reference list: spell out full name\n\n### Works with No Author\n- Use the title in the author position\n- In-text: use short title in quotes (\"Short Title,\" Year)\n- In reference list: alphabetize by the first significant word of the title\n\n### Personal Communications\n- In-text only: (J. Smith, personal communication, March 15, 2024)\n- NOT in reference list (not recoverable data)\n\n### Classical Works\n- No date needed for well-known classical works\n- Use original publication date / translation date: (Aristotle, trans. 1925)\n\n### Legal References\n- Follow *Bluebook* format for legal materials\n- Court cases italicized: *Brown v. Board of Education* (1954)\n\n## Extended Reference Formats\n\n### Software / App\n```\nAuthor, A. A. (Year). Title of software (Version X.X) [Computer software]. Publisher. URL\n```\n\n### Social Media\n```\nAuthor [@handle]. (Year, Month Day). Content of post up to first 20 words [Type of post]. Platform. URL\n```\n\n### Podcast Episode\n```\nHost, A. A. (Host). (Year, Month Day). Episode title (No. X) [Audio podcast episode]. In Podcast name. Publisher. URL\n```\n\n### YouTube Video\n```\nAuthor, A. A. [Screen name]. (Year, Month Day). Title of video [Video]. YouTube. URL\n```\n\n### Preprint\n```\nAuthor, A. A. (Year). Title of preprint. Name of Preprint Archive. https://doi.org/xxxxx\n```\n\n### AI-Generated Content (APA Guidance)\n```\nWhen citing AI-generated text:\nOpenAI. (2024). ChatGPT (Version 4) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com\nNote: Describe the prompt in the text. AI output is not recoverable,\nso provide the prompt and relevant output in appendix if needed.\n```\n\n## Tables and Figures (Extended)\n\n### Table Formatting\n```\nTable 1\n\nDescriptive Title in Italic Title Case\n\nColumn Head    Column Head    Column Head\n─────────────────────────────────────────\nRow 1 data     Row 1 data     Row 1 data\nRow 2 data     Row 2 data     Row 2 data\n─────────────────────────────────────────\n\nNote. General note. Specific note for a column or cell.\na Specific note. b Specific note.\n* p < .05. ** p < .01. *** p < .001.\n```\n\n### Figure Formatting\n```\nFigure 1\n\nDescriptive Title in Italic Title Case\n\n[Figure content]\n\nNote. Description and any necessary explanation.\nAdapted from \"Title,\" by A. Author, Year, Journal, Volume, p. X\n(https://doi.org/xxxxx). Copyright Year by Copyright Holder.\n```\n\n## Numbers and Statistics\n\n### Statistical Notation\n- Italicize statistical symbols: *M*, *SD*, *t*, *F*, *p*, *N*, *n*, *r*, *R²*\n- Report exact *p* values: *p* = .032 (not *p* < .05), unless *p* < .001\n- Effect sizes: always report (Cohen's *d*, η², *r*)\n- Confidence intervals: 95% CI [lower, upper]\n\n### Decimal Places\n| Statistic | Decimal Places |\n|-----------|---------------|\n| Proportions, correlations, inferential statistics | 2 |\n| Percentages | 0 or 1 |\n| Means, SDs | 2 (or match measurement precision) |\n| *p* values | 3 (report exact unless < .001) |\n\n## Bias-Free Language\n\n### Person-First vs. Identity-First\n- Generally prefer person-first: \"people with disabilities\"\n- Respect community preference: \"Deaf community\" (capital D)\n\n### Gender\n- Use \"they/them\" as singular gender-neutral pronoun\n- Avoid \"he or she\" — use \"they\"\n- Use specific terms: \"women and men\" not \"males and females\" (unless biological sex)\n\n### Age\n- Use specific ranges: \"older adults (65+)\" not \"the elderly\"\n\n### Racial/Ethnic Identity\n- Capitalize: Black, White, Indigenous, Asian American\n- Be specific when possible: \"Korean American\" not \"Asian\"\n\n## Common Errors Specific to Full Papers\n\n1. **Abstract doesn't match paper** — abstract written first, paper evolves, abstract not updated\n2. **Introduction has a heading** — in APA 7, the introduction doesn't get a \"Introduction\" heading\n3. **References not in hanging indent** — every reference entry: first line flush, subsequent lines indented\n4. **Et al. period missing** — it's \"et al.\" (with period) because \"al.\" is abbreviated\n5. **Ampersand in text** — use \"and\" in narrative, \"&\" only in parenthetical citations and reference list\n6. **Block quote formatting** — ≥40 words: indented, no quotation marks, citation after final period\n7. **Serial comma missing** — APA uses the Oxford comma: \"A, B, and C\"\n8. **Passive voice overuse** — APA 7 encourages active voice; passive only when actor is unknown\n\nFile v3.1.4:references/changelog.md\n\n# Version History\n\n| Version | Date | Changes |\n|---------|------|---------|\n| 2.5 | 2026-03-27 | Style Calibration (intake Step 10: learn author's writing voice from 3+ past papers, produce Style Profile with 6 dimensions, consumed by draft_writer as soft guide with discipline-convention priority). Writing Quality Check (`references/writing_quality_check.md`: 25-term AI high-frequency word warnings, em dash limits, throat-clearing detection, structural pattern warnings, burstiness checks — applied in draft_writer self-review). Style Profile carried through academic-pipeline Material Passport (Schema 10 in `shared/handoff_schemas.md`). deep-research report_compiler also consumes both features optionally |\n| 2.4 | 2026-03-08 | LaTeX output formatting hardening: mandatory `apa7` document class for APA 7.0 output; text justification fix (`ragged2e` + `etoolbox` to override apa7 man mode `\\raggedright`); table column width formula (`(\\linewidth - N\\tabcolsep) * \\real{proportion}` — prevents overflow); bilingual abstract centering (`\\begin{center}\\textbf{...}\\end{center}`); font stack standardized (Times New Roman + Source Han Serif TC VF + Courier New); `xurl` for URL line breaking; `fancyvrb` Verbatim with `fontsize` for wide content; PDF must compile from LaTeX via tectonic (no HTML-to-PDF) |\n| 2.3 | 2026-03-08 | NEW visualization_agent (11th: publication-quality figures with matplotlib/ggplot2, APA 7.0, colorblind-safe); NEW revision_coach_agent (12th: standalone reviewer comment parser → Revision Roadmap); Socratic convergence criteria (4 signals: thesis clarity, chapter coherence, evidence mapping, limitation honesty) + question taxonomy (clarifying, probing, structuring, challenging); revision tracking template (4 status types); citation format conversion in formatter_agent (APA 7 ↔ Chicago ↔ MLA ↔ IEEE ↔ Vancouver); Quick Mode Selection Guide; 9th mode: revision-coach |\n| 2.2 | 2026-03-05 | 4-level argument strength scoring with quantified thresholds; plagiarism & retraction screening protocol; F11 Desk-Reject Recovery + F12 Conference-to-Journal Conversion failure paths; Plan -> Full mode conversion protocol; cross-skill reference to `shared/handoff_schemas.md` |\n| 2.1 | 2026-03 | Added CRediT authorship guide, funding statement guide, 2 new templates (credit_statement_template, funding_statement_template); enhanced intake_agent with co-author + funding questions (Step 9-10); enhanced formatter_agent with CRediT + funding quality checks |\n| 2.0 | 2026-02 | NEW plan mode (Socratic guided chapter-by-chapter planning), deep-research handoff protocol, Chinese APA 7.0 citation guide, failure path handling, mode selection guide |\n| 1.0 | 2026-01 | Initial release: 9-agent pipeline, 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, multi-format output |\n\nFile v3.1.4:references/citation_format_switcher.md\n\n# Citation Format Switcher — Multi-Citation Format Switching\n\nQuick-reference for switching between 5 citation formats. Used by `citation_compliance_agent` and `formatter_agent`.\n\n## Format Comparison Matrix\n\n### In-Text Citation Patterns\n\n| Scenario | APA 7th | Chicago (Notes) | Chicago (Author-Date) | MLA 9th | IEEE | Vancouver |\n|----------|---------|-----------------|----------------------|---------|------|-----------|\n| Single author | (Smith, 2024) | ¹ (footnote) | (Smith 2024) | (Smith 45) | [1] | ¹ (superscript) |\n| Two authors | (Smith & Jones, 2024) | ¹ | (Smith and Jones 2024) | (Smith and Jones 45) | [1] | ¹ |\n| 3+ authors | (Smith et al., 2024) | ¹ | (Smith et al. 2024) | (Smith et al. 45) | [1] | ¹ |\n| Direct quote | (Smith, 2024, p. 45) | ¹ | (Smith 2024, 45) | (Smith 45) | [1, p. 45] | ¹⁽ᵖ⁴⁵⁾ |\n| Multiple works | (Chen, 2023; Smith, 2024) | ¹ ² | (Chen 2023; Smith 2024) | (Chen 12; Smith 45) | [1], [2] | ¹˒² |\n| Order | Alphabetical | Order of appearance | Alphabetical | Alphabetical | Order of appearance | Order of appearance |\n\n### Reference List Naming\n\n| Format | Section Title | Entry Order |\n|--------|--------------|-------------|\n| APA 7th | References | Alphabetical |\n| Chicago (Notes) | Bibliography | Alphabetical |\n| Chicago (Author-Date) | References | Alphabetical |\n| MLA 9th | Works Cited | Alphabetical |\n| IEEE | References | Order of appearance |\n| Vancouver | References | Order of appearance |\n\n## Format Details\n\n### APA 7th Edition\n**Discipline**: Education, Psychology, Social Sciences\n\n**Journal Article**:\n```\nSmith, J. A., & Jones, B. C. (2024). Article title in sentence case.\n    Journal Title in Title Case, 45(2), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.xxxx\n```\n\n**Book**:\n```\nSmith, J. A. (2024). Book title in sentence case (2nd ed.). Publisher.\n```\n\n**Key rules**: Hanging indent, DOI as URL, sentence case for titles, \"&\" before last author.\n\n---\n\n### Chicago 17th (Notes-Bibliography)\n**Discipline**: History, Humanities, some Social Sciences\n\n**Footnote (first citation)**:\n```\n1. John A. Smith and Betty C. Jones, \"Article Title in Title Case,\"\nJournal Title 45, no. 2 (2024): 123, https://doi.org/10.xxxx.\n```\n\n**Footnote (subsequent)**:\n```\n2. Smith and Jones, \"Article Title,\" 130.\n```\n\n**Bibliography entry**:\n```\nSmith, John A., and Betty C. Jones. \"Article Title in Title Case.\"\n    Journal Title 45, no. 2 (2024): 123-145.\n    https://doi.org/10.xxxx.\n```\n\n**Key rules**: Full names, title case throughout, footnotes + bibliography, period after URL.\n\n---\n\n### Chicago 17th (Author-Date)\n**Discipline**: Natural Sciences, some Social Sciences\n\n**In-text**: (Smith 2024, 45)\n\n**Reference**:\n```\nSmith, John A. 2024. \"Article Title in Title Case.\" Journal Title\n    45 (2): 123-145. https://doi.org/10.xxxx.\n```\n\n**Key rules**: Year after author name, full names in reference, title case.\n\n---\n\n### MLA 9th Edition\n**Discipline**: Literature, Languages, Cultural Studies\n\n**In-text**: (Smith 45) — author + page, no comma, no year\n\n**Works Cited**:\n```\nSmith, John A., and Betty C. Jones. \"Article Title in Title Case.\"\n    Journal Title, vol. 45, no. 2, 2024, pp. 123-45.\n```\n\n**Key rules**: No year in in-text, page numbers always, containers model, no DOI in basic format (include if online), title case for all titles.\n\n---\n\n### IEEE\n**Discipline**: Engineering, Computer Science, Technology\n\n**In-text**: [1] — numbered brackets in order of appearance\n\n**Reference**:\n```\n[1] J. A. Smith and B. C. Jones, \"Article title in sentence case,\"\n    Journal Title, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 123-145, Feb. 2024,\n    doi: 10.xxxx.\n```\n\n**Key rules**: Numbered [N], initials before surname, abbreviated month, \"doi:\" prefix (not URL).\n\n---\n\n### Vancouver\n**Discipline**: Medicine, Biomedical Sciences, Nursing\n\n**In-text**: Superscript numbers ¹ or (1) in order of appearance\n\n**Reference**:\n```\n1. Smith JA, Jones BC. Article title in sentence case. Journal Title.\n   2024;45(2):123-145. doi:10.xxxx\n```\n\n**Key rules**: Numbered in order of appearance, no spaces in initials, abbreviated journal titles (per NLM), semicolon before volume, colon before pages.\n\n## Conversion Quick Reference\n\n### APA → Chicago (Notes-Bibliography)\n1. Change in-text (Author, Year) → footnotes\n2. Expand first names in reference list\n3. Change sentence case → title case for article titles\n4. Add period after URLs\n5. Rename \"References\" → \"Bibliography\"\n\n### APA → MLA\n1. Remove years from in-text, add page numbers\n2. Expand first names, change \"&\" → \"and\"\n3. Change format: vol., no., year order\n4. Remove DOIs (unless online-only source)\n5. Rename \"References\" → \"Works Cited\"\n\n### APA → IEEE\n1. Change (Author, Year) → [N] numbered brackets\n2. Reorder references by appearance (not alphabetical)\n3. Change to initials-first format\n4. Add \"doi:\" prefix to DOIs\n5. Abbreviate month names\n\n### APA → Vancouver\n1. Change (Author, Year) → superscript numbers\n2. Reorder references by appearance\n3. Remove spaces between initials\n4. Abbreviate journal titles (NLM catalog)\n5. Use semicolons/colons for volume/page separators\n\n## Chinese Citation Format Switching\n\n### APA 7.0 Chinese Format\n\nFor complete specifications, see `apa7_chinese_citation_guide.md`. Below is a quick reference.\n\n**Chinese journal article**:\n```\nWang, Da-Ming, & Li, Xiao-Hua (2024). Article title. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx\n```\n\n**Chinese book**:\n```\nZhang, San (2023). Book title. Publisher.\n```\n\n**Government publication**:\n```\nMinistry of Education (2024). Publication title. https://url\n```\n\n### Mixed Chinese-English Reference Handling\n\n**In-text citations**:\n- Chinese uses full-width parentheses: (Author, Year)\n- English uses half-width parentheses: (Author, Year)\n- Chinese multiple authors use enumeration comma; English uses &\n\n**Reference list ordering**:\n\n| Option | Description | Applicable Scenario |\n|------|------|---------|\n| **Option A (Recommended)** | Chinese first (ordered by stroke count), English after (ordered alphabetically) | Convention for most Taiwan journals |\n| **Option B** | Mixed Chinese-English ordering (unified stroke count / alphabetical) | Some international journals |\n\n**Same author with both Chinese and English works**: List separately — Chinese works go in the Chinese section, English works go in the English section.\n\n### Format Conversion Notes (Chinese Papers)\n\n**Chinese APA → Chicago**:\n1. Publication format differs (APA 7 does not require publication location, Chicago does)\n2. Change titles to \"title case\" format\n3. Add footnote citation system\n\n**Chinese APA → IEEE**:\n1. Add numbered labels [N]\n2. Remove year from after author position\n3. Order by citation appearance (not stroke count)\n\n**Chinese paper format conventions**:\n- Most Taiwan journals use APA\n- Humanities disciplines (history, literature) occasionally use Chicago\n- Engineering/CS fields mostly use IEEE\n- Medical fields use Vancouver\n\n---\n\n## AI-Generated Content Citation (by Format)\n\n| Format | How to Cite AI |\n|--------|---------------|\n| APA 7th | OpenAI. (2024). ChatGPT (Version 4) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com |\n| Chicago | OpenAI. ChatGPT. Version 4. 2024. Large language model. https://chat.openai.com. |\n| MLA | \"ChatGPT response to [prompt description].\" OpenAI, 15 Mar. 2024, chat.openai.com. |\n| IEEE | [N] OpenAI, \"ChatGPT,\" ver. 4, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://chat.openai.com |\n| Vancouver | OpenAI. ChatGPT [Large language model]. 2024. Available from: https://chat.openai.com |\n\nFile v3.1.4:references/credit_authorship_guide.md\n\n# CRediT Authorship Guide\n\nUsed by `intake_agent`, `formatter_agent`, and `draft_writer_agent`.\n\n## Overview\n\nCRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) is a standardized taxonomy of author contributions, co-developed by CASRAI and NISO in 2015. It has now been adopted by over 50 major publishers (Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley, Taylor & Francis, PLOS, etc.). CRediT defines 14 contribution roles; each author may be assigned one or more roles, and each role may be undertaken by one or more authors.\n\n---\n\n## CRediT 14 Contribution Roles\n\n### 1. Conceptualization\n\n**Definition**: Ideas; formulation or evolution of overarching research goals and aims.\n\n**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:\n- Proposing the research concept of \"the impact of declining birthrate on private university management strategies\"\n- Establishing the research question: examining the impact pathways of the HEEACT accreditation system on teaching quality\n- Designing the research framework: applying BSC (Balanced Scorecard) to university self-assessment\n\n### 2. Data Curation\n\n**Definition**: Management activities to annotate (produce metadata), scrub data and maintain research data (including software code, where it is necessary for interpreting the data itself) for initial use and later re-use.\n\n**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:\n- Organizing MOE (Ministry of Education) public statistics and building a cross-year comparative database\n- Cleaning UCAN competency diagnostic raw data, handling missing values and outliers\n- Building an institutional metadata mapping table (including name changes and merger records)\n\n### 3. Formal Analysis\n\n**Definition**: Application of statistical, mathematical, computational, or other formal techniques to analyze or synthesize study data.\n\n**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:\n- Performing Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to analyze the relationship between accreditation indicators and student learning outcomes\n- Conducting Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to evaluate university operational efficiency\n- Using text mining techniques to analyze self-assessment report texts\n\n### 4. Funding Acquisition\n\n**Definition**: Acquisition of the financial support for the project leading to this publication.\n\n**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:\n- Applying for NSTC (National Science and Technology Council) research grants\n- Obtaining MOE Higher Education Sprout Project funding\n- Securing seed project funding from the institutional Office of Research and Development\n\n### 5. Investigation\n\n**Definition**: Conducting a research and investigation process, specifically performing the experiments, or data/evidence collection.\n\n**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:\n- Conducting a survey: surveying faculty across all higher education institutions on the current state of teaching practice research\n- Conducting in-depth interviews: interviewing quality assurance directors at 10 universities\n- Collecting self-assessment reports and site visit records from various institutions\n\n### 6. Methodology\n\n**Definition**: Development or design of methodology; creation of models.\n\n**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:\n- Designing a mixed-methods research framework (quantitative survey + qualitative interviews)\n- Developing a higher education quality indicator assessment tool\n- Constructing an indicator system for a university exit early-warning model\n\n### 7. Project Administration\n\n**Definition**: Management and coordination responsibility for the research activity planning and execution.\n\n**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:\n- Coordinating the work progress of a cross-institutional research team\n- Managing phased outputs of a multi-year NSTC grant\n- Arranging accreditation site visit schedules and committee member assignments\n\n### 8. Resources\n\n**Definition**: Provision of study materials, reagents, materials, patients, laboratory samples, animals, instrumentation, computing resources, or other analysis tools.\n\n**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:\n- Providing access to an Institutional Research (IR) database\n- Providing authorization to use HEEACT accreditation data\n- Providing high-performance computing resources for large-scale text analysis\n\n### 9. Software\n\n**Definition**: Programming, software development; designing computer programs; implementation of the computer code and supporting algorithms; testing of existing code components.\n\n**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:\n- Developing an automated accreditation indicator calculation dashboard\n- Writing Python/R statistical analysis code\n- Building an NLP text analysis system\n\n### 10. Supervision\n\n**Definition**: Oversight and leadership responsibility for the research activity planning and execution, including mentorship external to the core team.\n\n**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:\n- Supervising graduate students in conducting thesis research\n- Serving as principal investigator and monitoring research quality\n- Providing methodological guidance as a senior scholar\n\n### 11. Validation\n\n**Definition**: Verification, whether as a part of the activity or separate, of the overall replication/reproducibility of results/experiments and other research outputs.\n\n**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:\n- Verifying the robustness of quantitative analysis results (sensitivity analysis)\n- Using triangulation to confirm qualitative research findings\n- Cross-checking the consistency of different data sources\n\n### 12. Visualization\n\n**Definition**: Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work, specifically visualization/data presentation.\n\n**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:\n- Creating accreditation indicator trend charts and dashboards\n- Designing research framework diagrams and conceptual model diagrams\n- Creating charts and heatmaps for statistical analysis results\n\n### 13. Writing -- Original Draft\n\n**Definition**: Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work, specifically writing the initial draft (including substantive translation).\n\n**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:\n- Writing the complete initial draft of the paper (including all chapters)\n- Translating the Chinese initial draft into an English submission version\n- Writing specific chapters (e.g., literature review or methodology)\n\n### 14. Writing -- Review & Editing\n\n**Definition**: Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work by those from the original research group, specifically critical review, commentary or revision — including pre- or post-publication stages.\n\n**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:\n- Reviewing and revising co-authors' initial drafts\n- Making revisions based on peer review comments\n- Proofreading the final version for text and formatting\n\n---\n\n## ICMJE Authorship Criteria\n\nThe International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) authorship criteria are widely referenced across all academic disciplines. **All four conditions must be met** to be listed as an author:\n\n| # | Condition | Description |\n|---|------|------|\n| 1 | Substantial contributions | Substantial contributions to the conception or design; or to the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data |\n| 2 | Drafting or revising | Participation in drafting the manuscript or critically reviewing important intellectual content |\n| 3 | Final approval | Approval of the final version for submission |\n| 4 | Accountability | Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work, ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part are appropriately investigated and resolved |\n\n### Contributions That Do Not Qualify for Authorship\n\nThe following contributions typically **do not qualify** for authorship and should be listed in the Acknowledgments:\n\n- Providing funding support only\n- Providing administrative support or resources only\n- Language editing or translation only\n- Data entry or transcription only\n- Serving as a department head only (without actual research involvement)\n\n---\n\n## Contribution Matrix Example\n\n### Author x Role Matrix\n\n| Role | Author A (Corresponding Author) | Author B | Author C |\n|------|:---:|:---:|:---:|\n| Conceptualization | Lead | Supporting | -- |\n| Data curation | -- | Lead | Supporting |\n| Formal analysis | Supporting | Lead | -- |\n| Funding acquisition | Lead | -- | -- |\n| Investigation | Supporting | Lead | Lead |\n| Methodology | Lead | Supporting | -- |\n| Project administration | Lead | -- | -- |\n| Resources | Lead | -- | -- |\n| Software | -- | Lead | -- |\n| Supervision | Lead | -- | -- |\n| Validation | Supporting | Supporting | Lead |\n| Visualization | -- | Lead | Supporting |\n| Writing -- original draft | Lead | Supporting | -- |\n| Writing -- review & editing | Lead | Supporting | Supporting |\n\n**Label Descriptions**:\n- **Lead**: Primarily responsible for this contribution\n- **Supporting**: Assisting or auxiliary role\n- **--**: Did not participate\n\n---\n\n## AI Not Listed as Author Policy\n\n### Major Publisher and Organization Positions\n\n| Organization/Publisher | Policy Summary | Effective Date |\n|------------|---------|---------|\n| **ICMJE** | AI tools do not meet the four authorship criteria (cannot be accountable, cannot approve); must not be listed as authors | 2023 |\n| **APA** (American Psychological Association) | AI not listed as author; AI use must be disclosed in methods or acknowledgments | 2023 |\n| **Nature/Springer Nature** | LLMs not listed as authors; must disclose usage in methods or acknowledgments | 2023 |\n| **Science/AAAS** | AI-generated text cannot be presented as original work; AI use must be disclosed | 2023 |\n| **Elsevier** | AI tools not listed as authors; must disclose in the manuscript | 2023 |\n| **Wiley** | AI not listed as author; must describe usage in acknowledgments | 2023 |\n| **Taylor & Francis** | AI not listed as author; must disclose AI use at submission | 2023 |\n| **IEEE** | AI must not be listed as author or co-author | 2023 |\n\n### AI Disclosure Best Practices\n\n1. **Clearly state in Methods or Acknowledgments** which AI tools were used and how they were used\n2. **Authors take full responsibility** for all AI-assisted output content\n3. **AI-produced text must not be directly presented as original research findings**\n4. **Recommended format for citing AI tools** (per APA 7th):\n\n```\nOpenAI. (2024). ChatGPT (Version GPT-4) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/\n```\n\n---\n\n## CRediT Requirements Across Major Journals\n\n| Journal/Publisher | CRediT Requirement | Format |\n|------------|------------|------|\n| Most **Elsevier** journals | Mandatory | Select roles in submission system |\n| **PLOS ONE** | Mandatory | Stated in text within the manuscript |\n| Some **Springer Nature** journals | Encouraged | Stated in text within the manuscript |\n| Some **Wiley** journals | Encouraged | Text or table within the manuscript |\n| All **MDPI** journals | Mandatory | Dedicated section at end of manuscript |\n| Some **Taylor & Francis** journals | Encouraged | Stated in text within the manuscript |\n| **TSSCI** Taiwan journals | Few require it | Per individual journal regulations |\n\n---\n\n## Boundary Between Acknowledgments and Authorship\n\n| List as Author | List in Acknowledgments |\n|---------|---------|\n| Designed the research framework | Provided administrative support |\n| Wrote or substantially revised the manuscript | Language editing/translation |\n| Performed data analysis | Data entry/transcription |\n| Obtained research funding AND participated in research | Provided funding only without research involvement |\n| Designed the research methodology | Provided laboratory/equipment |\n| Supervised research and provided academic guidance | Served as administrative head only |\n\n### Acknowledgments Section Example\n\n```\nThe authors would like to thank [Name] from [Institution] for administrative\nsupport, [Name] for language editing, and the anonymous reviewers for their\nconstructive feedback. This study was conducted with the support of the\nHigher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan (HEEACT).\n```\n\n---\n\n## CRediT Statement Templates\n\n### English Version\n\n**Author Contributions Statement**:\n\n```\n[Author A]: Conceptualization, Methodology, Funding acquisition,\nWriting – original draft, Supervision, Project administration.\n[Author B]: Data curation, Formal analysis, Software, Visualization,\nWriting – original draft, Writing – review & editing.\n[Author C]: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing.\n```\n\n### Chinese Version\n\n**Author Contributions Statement**:\n\n```\n[Author A]: Conceptualization, Methodology, Funding acquisition,\nWriting – original draft, Supervision, Project administration.\n[Author B]: Data curation, Formal analysis, Software, Visualization,\nWriting – original draft, Writing – review & editing.\n[Author C]: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing.\n```\n\n### Chinese-English Role Mapping\n\n| English | Romanized Chinese |\n|------|------|\n| Conceptualization | Gai Nian Hua |\n| Data curation | Zi Liao Guan Li |\n| Formal analysis | Zheng Shi Fen Xi |\n| Funding acquisition | Jing Fei Qu De |\n| Investigation | Diao Cha Yan Jiu |\n| Methodology | Yan Jiu Fang Fa |\n| Project administration | Ji Hua Guan Li |\n| Resources | Zi Yuan Ti Gong |\n| Software | Ruan Ti Kai Fa |\n| Supervision | Zhi Dao Jian Du |\n| Validation | Yan Zheng |\n| Visualization | Shi Jue Hua |\n| Writing -- original draft | Zhuan Xie Chu Gao |\n| Writing -- review & editing | Shen Yue Xiu Ding |\n\n---\n\n## Reference Resources\n\n- CRediT official taxonomy: https://credit.niso.org/\n- ICMJE authorship criteria: https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html\n- APA AI policy: https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/resources/ai-policy\n- Nature AI policy: https://www.nature.com/nature-portfolio/editorial-policies/ai\n\nFile v3.1.4:references/disclosure_mode_protocol.md\n\n# Disclosure Mode Protocol\n\n**Status**: v3.2 (#108 extension: parallel `--policy-anchor=<a>` path; v3.2 venue path unchanged)\n**Parent skill**: `academic-paper`\n**Mode name**: `disclosure`\n**Purpose**: Generate either (a) a venue-specific AI-usage disclosure statement that complies with the target venue's current AI policy (v3.2 path, default), or (b) a policy-anchor-specific disclosure rendered from the 4-anchor matrix (PRISMA-trAIce / ICMJE / Nature / IEEE) when the author targets a policy anchor rather than a specific journal venue (#108 path).\n\n---\n\n## Two parallel tracks (#108 + v3.2)\n\nThe `disclosure` mode dispatches on the author-supplied selector:\n\n| Selector | Track | Lookup source | Output shape |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| `--venue=<v>` (v3.2, default) | Venue track | `venue_disclosure_policies.md` v1 database (ICLR / NeurIPS / Nature / Science / ACL / EMNLP) | Single venue-tailored disclosure paragraph + placement instruction |\n| `--policy-anchor=<a>` (#108) | Anchor track | `policy_anchor_table.md` 4-anchor × 16-field matrix | 4-anchor-conditioned render per `policy_anchor_disclosure_protocol.md` |\n\nThe two tracks are **selector-mutually-exclusive by default** — one selector picks one track. When the author supplies **both** selectors in the same invocation, the renderer evaluates compatibility per concern #7 rules: a consistent pair (Nature venue + nature anchor, both sourced from `shared/policy_data/nature_policy.md`) proceeds; any other pair is **rejected with an explicit error** listing the policy conflict. Silent precedence between selectors is forbidden. See [policy_anchor_disclosure_protocol.md §5](policy_anchor_disclosure_protocol.md) for the full conflict-resolution detail.\n\nIf neither selector is supplied and the pipeline orchestrator does not infer one from upstream context, the mode prompts the user to specify which selector applies. The venue track remains the default for explicit journal submissions; the anchor track applies when targeting policy frameworks (e.g., compliance reporting to ICMJE-adopting journals collectively, or pre-submission alignment to IEEE author guidelines).\n\n**Conflict resolution (concern #7) — exhaustive cases:**\n- Supplied both, **consistent pair** (only currently defined case): `--venue=Nature` (any Nature Portfolio variant string) **and** `--policy-anchor=nature` → both target Nature substantive policy via the shared source pointer → **proceed**.\n- Supplied both, **any other combination** (e.g., `--venue=Nature` + `--policy-anchor=ieee`; `--venue=ICLR` + `--policy-anchor=icmje`; or a Nature-venue spelling that does not match the canonical set with a non-nature anchor) → **reject** with explicit error citing the policy conflict; require the user to drop one selector. Silent precedence is forbidden by §4.4 #7.\n- Supplied only one selector → run that track.\n- Supplied neither selector → prompt the user to specify.\n\n---\n\n## Why this mode exists\n\n`academic-paper` already ships two generic AI disclosure templates in `journal_submission_guide.md` (\"Minimal Disclosure\" and \"Detailed Disclosure\"). Those templates are a good starting point but they are venue-agnostic: they don't know that Nature requires disclosure in the Methods section specifically, that ICLR requires it in the paper body with acknowledgement that \"LLMs were used as general-purpose writing tools\", or that ACL requires the disclosure in a dedicated \"Use of AI Assistance\" subsection.\n\nThe v3.2 venue track closes the venue-specific gap. The #108 anchor track closes the policy-framework-specific gap that emerges when authors target a policy anchor (PRISMA-trAIce SLR guideline, ICMJE recommendations, Nature Portfolio editorial policy, IEEE author guidelines) rather than a specific journal venue.\n\n---\n\n## Inputs\n\n1. **Paper draft**: current manuscript text (the mode needs to know what the AI actually did in order to describe it accurately).\n\n2. **Selector** (one of):\n   - **Target venue (`--venue=<v>`)**: journal or conference name (v3.2 path). If the venue is in the v1 database (ICLR, NeurIPS, Nature, Science, ACL, EMNLP), use the cached policy. If not, refuse to guess — prompt the user to paste the venue's current AI policy text from the venue's submission page.\n   - **Policy anchor (`--policy-anchor=<a>`)**: one of `prisma-trAIce, icmje, nature, ieee` (#108 path). Anchor lookup follows `policy_anchor_disclosure_protocol.md`.\n\n3. **Pipeline signal** (#108 anchor path only): `slr_lineage=true|false` set by the upstream pipeline orchestrator. Required for `--policy-anchor=prisma-trAIce` per §4.3 G2 invariant. Cold-start invocation requires explicit `mode=<value>` parameter; silent fallback to general track is forbidden.\n\n4. **What ARS did**: the mode reads the paper's commit history / pipeline log (if using the full `academic-pipeline`) to identify which AI-assisted steps produced which parts of the paper. At minimum: research assistance, drafting assistance, revision assistance, citation checking, peer review simulation. If the pipeline log is not available, ask the user to confirm which categories apply.\n\n---\n\n## Process\n\n### Phase 1: Intake + lookup (selector-aware)\n\n**Step 1a — selector dispatch:**\n- Both `--venue=<v>` and `--policy-anchor=<a>` supplied → check policy compatibility per the Two-parallel-tracks section above. **Consistent pair (currently only any Nature Portfolio venue + `--policy-anchor=nature`, where \"Nature Portfolio venue\" includes canonical labels {\"Nature\", \"Nature Portfolio\", \"Nature (Nature Publishing Group)\", \"Nature Publishing Group\"} and the journal-family prefix `\"Nature \"` matching e.g. \"Nature Medicine\", \"Nature Communications\", \"Nature Climate Change\", etc.) → route the consistent pair to **step 1c (anchor path)** so the shared canonical source `shared/policy_data/nature_policy.md` drives rendering; step 1b's v1 venue database does not need to contain every Nature Portfolio journal**. Conflicting pair → reject with explicit error.\n- `--venue=<v>` only → step 1b (venue path).\n- `--policy-anchor=<a>` only → step 1c (anchor path).\n- Neither supplied → prompt the user to specify selector.\n\n**Step 1b — venue lookup (v3.2 path, unchanged):**\n- If venue is in the v1 database → load policy from `venue_disclosure_policies.md`.\n- If venue is unknown → halt. Print: \"I do not have a cached policy for {venue}. Please paste the venue's current AI-usage / generative-AI policy text so I don't guess.\" Do NOT fabricate a policy.\n- If the user pastes a policy for an unknown venue, use it for this session only. Do NOT auto-persist it to the database — policies drift, and the database needs curation.\n\n**Step 1c — anchor lookup (#108 path):**\n- Validate `--policy-anchor=<a>` ∈ `{prisma-trAIce, icmje, nature, ieee}`. Other values → reject with the closed-enum error.\n- For `--policy-anchor=prisma-trAIce`: confirm `slr_lineage=true` (pipeline signal) or `mode=systematic-review` (cold-start input) per the G2 invariant track gate. Otherwise refuse with G2 invariant citation.\n- Delegate Phase 3 + Phase 4 to `policy_anchor_disclosure_protocol.md` per-anchor render flows. Phase 2 (AI usage categorization) and Phase 5 (placement instructions) are shared with the venue path with the anchor-specific routing applied inside Phase 3/4.\n\n### Phase 2: Categorize AI usage\n\nProduce a categorized list of how AI was used in the manuscript:\n\n| Category | Examples |\n|---|---|\n| Research assistance | Literature search, annotated bibliography, claim verification |\n| Drafting assistance | Section drafting, paraphrasing, outline generation |\n| Revision assistance | Reviewer response drafting, tracked changes, consistency checking |\n| Editing assistance | Grammar, style, formatting, citation format conversion |\n| Analysis assistance | Not applicable to pure writing flows; flag if the paper reports any analysis the AI did |\n| Peer review simulation | `academic-paper-reviewer` was used on the draft pre-submission |\n\nFor each category, mark: USED / NOT USED / UNCERTAIN. UNCERTAIN items require user confirmation before the disclosure text is finalized.\n\n### Phase 3: Match categories to the venue's required phrasing\n\nEach venue in the policy database specifies (a) which categories are mandatory to disclose, (b) which are optional, (c) which are prohibited (e.g., analysis assistance may require separate disclosure at some venues). The mode matches the user's category list against the venue's requirements and flags any mismatch (e.g., \"Venue requires disclosure of research assistance; your categorization marked it UNCERTAIN\").\n\n### Phase 4: Generate the disclosure text\n\nGenerate a single disclosure paragraph using:\n- The venue's preferred voice (first person vs passive, past tense vs present)\n- The venue's required phrasing elements (many venues require the phrase \"The authors take full responsibility for the content\" or equivalent)\n- The specific tool name — \"Claude (Anthropic) via Academic Research Skills pipeline\" — not generic \"AI tools\"\n- The specific categories marked USED\n\nExample output for Nature (which requires disclosure in Methods):\n\n```\n## AI-assisted tools\n\nThe authors used Claude [MODEL_VERSION] (Anthropic), orchestrated via the\nAcademic Research Skills pipeline (Wu, 2026), during the preparation\nof this manuscript. Specifically, the tool was used for literature\nsearch assistance, citation verification, drafting of section outlines,\nand internal peer-review simulation prior to submission. All\nAI-assisted output was reviewed, edited, and verified by the authors,\nwho take full responsibility for the content of this article.\n```\n\n**Note**: Replace `[MODEL_VERSION]` with the actual model used in this run (e.g., `Opus 4.7`, `Sonnet 4.6`). Pull the identifier from session metadata rather than hard-coding a version, since Anthropic's lineup changes over time.\n\n### Phase 5: Placement instructions\n\nOutput includes explicit placement instructions matching the venue's policy:\n\n```\nPlacement: Methods section (Nature policy, accessed YYYY-MM-DD from\nhttps://www.nature.com/.../policy-url). Include as the final\nsubsection of Methods, before Data Availability.\n```\n\nIf the venue requires placement in multiple locations (e.g., Methods + cover letter + Acknowledgements), the mode generates tailored text for each location rather than a single paragraph.\n\n---\n\n## Failure cases this mode does NOT cover\n\n- **Venues outside the v1 database**: the mode halts and asks the user. It does not guess.\n- **Policies that have changed since the database snapshot**: the mode records the access date in the placement instructions. Users should verify against the current venue page before submission.\n- **Analysis assistance**: if the AI actually ran computations or generated analysis results (not just writing), most venues require a separate disclosure in a Code Availability or Analysis section. This mode flags the case and produces a separate paragraph; the user must place it manually.\n- **Co-authored AI**: as of the 2026 policy snapshot, no venue in the v1 database accepts AI as a listed author. The mode refuses to produce author-list text and instead produces authorship-rejection text plus the disclosure.\n\n---\n\n## Integration with existing journal_submission_guide.md\n\n`journal_submission_guide.md` retains the two generic templates (Minimal / Detailed) as fallback for venues not in the v1 database. Disclosure mode's output supersedes those templates when the venue is known. The guide is updated to point to this mode for known venues.\n\n---\n\n## References\n\n- `venue_disclosure_policies.md` — v1 policy database (ICLR, NeurIPS, Nature, Science, ACL, EMNLP)\n- `policy_anchor_table.md` — #108 4-anchor × 16-field matrix (PRISMA-trAIce, ICMJE, Nature, IEEE) for the policy-anchor track\n- `policy_anchor_disclosure_protocol.md` — #108 policy-anchor track render protocol (per-anchor flows, G10 7-row precedence table, auto-promotion forbiddance, §4.4 11 concerns resolved paths)\n- `journal_submission_guide.md` — existing generic templates (fallback)\n- `credit_authorship_guide.md` — existing CRediT authorship best practices\n- Lu et al. (2026). Towards end-to-end automation of AI research. *Nature* 651, 914-919 — the ethics statement for Lu 2026 was drafted in compliance with Nature's policy; their methodology is a worked example of what this mode should produce.\n- `docs/design/2026-05-14-ai-disclosure-schema-decision.md` — #108 Decision Doc (G1-G10 + §4.3 invariants + §4.4 11 open concerns)\n- `docs/design/2026-05-14-ai-disclosure-impl-spec.md` — #108 implementation spec (resolved-paths table)\n- ROADMAP_v3.2.md item 6 — design decisions (v1 venue set, unknown-venue halt, education/QA venues deferred to v2)\n\nFile v3.1.4:references/failure_paths.md\n\n# Failure Paths — Academic Paper Writing Failure Path Map\n\nThis document records the failure scenarios that the academic-paper skill may encounter at each stage, their trigger conditions, and handling strategies. All agents should refer to this guide when they detect a failure scenario.\n\n---\n\n## Failure Path Overview\n\n| # | Failure Scenario | Trigger Condition | Severity | Handling Strategy |\n|---|---------|---------|--------|---------|\n| F1 | Insufficient research foundation | Plan mode Step 0 finds no RQ / no data | High | Recommend running `deep-research` first |\n| F2 | Wrong paper structure selected | structure_architect finds RQ-structure mismatch | Medium | Return to Phase 2, suggest alternative structures |\n| F3 | Severely over word count | Draft exceeds target word count by 30% or more | Medium | Identify sections to cut, suggest condensing |\n| F4 | Severely under word count | Draft is 30% or more below target word count | Medium | Identify sections to expand, suggest additions |\n| F5 | Citation format entirely wrong | citation_compliance finds > 50% format errors | High | Completely re-run citation phase |\n| F6 | Poor bilingual abstract quality | Chinese and English abstracts have inconsistent logic | Medium | Re-run abstract_bilingual |\n| F7 | Peer review rejection | peer_reviewer issues a Reject verdict | High | Analyze rejection reasons, recommend major revision or restructuring |\n| F8 | Plan mode does not converge | > 15 rounds of dialogue without completing all chapters | Medium | Suggest switching to outline-only mode |\n| F9 | Incomplete handoff materials | From deep-research but missing key materials | Low | List missing items, suggest supplementing or re-running |\n| F10 | User abandons midway | Explicitly states unwillingness to continue | Low | Save completed Chapter Plan |\n| F11 | Desk-reject | Journal editor rejects without sending to reviewers | High | Classify rejection cause, select recovery strategy |\n| F12 | Conference-to-journal conversion failure | Conference paper expansion to journal article rejected | Medium | Ensure 30-50% new content + proper citation |\n\n---\n\n## Detailed Handling Strategies\n\n### F1: Insufficient Research Foundation\n\n**Trigger Timing**: Plan mode Step 0 (Research Readiness Check) or Full mode Phase 0\n\n**Detection Indicators**:\n- User cannot describe their research question in one sentence\n- No literature foundation\n- No concept of research methods\n- Topic is too broad and cannot be focused\n\n**Handling Process**:\n```\n1. Affirm the user's research interest\n2. Specifically explain what is currently missing\n3. Recommend using deep-research (socratic mode)\n4. Explain that they can come back to continue after deep-research is completed\n5. If the user insists on continuing, switch to outline-only mode (low risk)\n```\n\n**Response Template**:\n```\nYour research topic is very interesting, but I notice that a clear research question\nand literature foundation are still missing.\n\nI recommend you first use the deep-research tool to:\n1. Systematically search and organize relevant literature\n2. Focus on a researchable question\n3. Gain a preliminary understanding of possible research methods\n\nOnce completed, bring the materials back and we can produce a high-quality paper\nmore efficiently.\n```\n\n---\n\n### F2: Wrong Paper Structure Selected\n\n**Trigger Timing**: Phase 2 (structure_architect_agent)\n\n**Detection Indicators**:\n- RQ is a causal question but a Literature Review structure was selected\n- No data but IMRaD was selected\n- Topic suits a Case Study but Policy Brief was selected\n- Word count target and structure are mismatched (e.g., 3000-word IMRaD)\n\n**Handling Process**:\n```\n1. Point out the mismatch between RQ and structure\n2. Explain why they are mismatched\n3. Suggest 1-2 alternative structures\n4. Explain how the alternative structures better answer the RQ\n5. Return to Phase 2 to let the user re-select\n```\n\n---\n\n### F3: Severely Over Word Count\n\n**Trigger Timing**: Phase 4 (after draft_writer_agent completes)\n\n**Detection Indicators**:\n- Actual word count > target word count x 1.3\n\n**Handling Process**:\n```\n1. List actual word count vs. target word count for each chapter\n2. Identify the most over-count chapters\n3. Suggest reduction strategies:\n   a. Merge duplicate arguments\n   b. Condense the literature review (keep core literature)\n   c. Remove overly detailed method descriptions\n   d. Compress repeated literature dialogue in Discussion\n4. Do not proactively delete; let the user decide\n```\n\n---\n\n### F4: Severely Under Word Count\n\n**Trigger Timing**: Phase 4 (after draft_writer_agent completes)\n\n**Detection Indicators**:\n- Actual word count < target word count x 0.7\n\n**Handling Process**:\n```\n1. List actual word count vs. target word count for each chapter\n2. Identify the most deficient chapters\n3. Suggest expansion strategies:\n   a. Increase the depth and breadth of the literature review\n   b. Add more evidence and examples\n   c. Expand Discussion (more literature dialogue)\n   d. Add more detail to methodology descriptions\n4. Provide specific expansion directions\n```\n\n---\n\n### F5: Citation Format Entirely Wrong\n\n**Trigger Timing**: Phase 5a (citation_compliance_agent)\n\n**Detection Indicators**:\n- Citation format error rate > 50%\n- Systematic errors (e.g., all missing DOIs, all using wrong format)\n\n**Handling Process**:\n```\n1. Analyze error patterns (systematic vs. scattered)\n2. If systematic errors:\n   a. Identify root cause (user may have selected the wrong citation format)\n   b. Confirm the correct citation format\n   c. Completely re-run citation phase\n3. If scattered errors:\n   a. Fix one by one\n   b. Produce a correction report\n```\n\n---\n\n### F6: Poor Bilingual Abstract Quality\n\n**Trigger Timing**: Phase 5b (abstract_bilingual_agent)\n\n**Detection Indicators**:\n- Chinese and English abstracts cover different key points\n- One language version omits important findings\n- Keywords do not correspond between Chinese and English\n- Word count seriously deviates from standards\n\n**Handling Process**:\n```\n1. Compare the structure and coverage of Chinese and English abstracts\n2. List inconsistencies\n3. Rewrite based on the actual paper content as the standard\n4. Ensure both versions are independently written but cover the same key points\n```\n\n---\n\n### F7: Peer Review Rejection\n\n**Trigger Timing**: Phase 6 (peer_reviewer_agent issues Reject)\n\n**Detection Indicators**:\n- Two or more of the five dimensions scored below 60\n- Fatal flaws exist (logical breakdowns, missing core evidence, serious methodology flaws)\n\n**Handling Process**:\n```\n1. List all issues flagged as Critical\n2. Classify the nature of the problems:\n   a. Fixable (writing, formatting, minor logic issues) → Recommend Major Revision\n   b. Structural issues (argument architecture needs reorganization) → Return to Phase 3 for restructuring\n   c. Fundamental issues (RQ infeasible, insufficient data) → Return to Phase 0 for re-evaluation\n3. Produce a revision roadmap\n4. Execute revision after user confirmation\n```\n\n**Note**: If still Reject after 2 rounds of revision, recommend the user to:\n- Consult domain experts\n- Rethink the research design\n- Consider switching target journals (lower the bar)\n\n---\n\n### F8: Plan Mode Does Not Converge\n\n**Trigger Timing**: Plan mode dialogue exceeds 15 rounds\n\n**Detection Indicators**:\n- User repeatedly modifies the direction of the same chapter\n- Unable to make definitive decisions\n- Discussion drifts off the paper topic\n\n**Handling Process**:\n```\n1. Pause and summarize what has been determined so far\n2. List completed and uncompleted chapters\n3. Provide two options:\n   a. Jump to outline-only mode (directly produce an outline)\n   b. Continue dialogue (but narrow the scope of each discussion)\n4. Save the completed Chapter Plan\n```\n\n---\n\n### F9: Incomplete Handoff Materials\n\n**Trigger Timing**: intake_agent detects deep-research materials but they are incomplete\n\n**Detection Indicators**:\n- Has RQ but missing Annotated Bibliography\n- Has Bibliography but missing Synthesis Report\n- Has INSIGHT Collection but some INSIGHTs are incomplete\n\n**Handling Process**:\n```\n1. List received and missing materials\n2. Assess the impact of missing materials:\n   a. Missing Bibliography → Need Phase 1 (literature_strategist)\n   b. Missing Synthesis → Can continue, Phase 3 handles it additionally\n   c. Missing Methodology Blueprint → Need Phase 0 supplementary questions\n3. Recommend:\n   a. Return to deep-research to complete the missing parts\n   b. Or supplement within academic-paper (add Phase 0 interview questions)\n```\n\n---\n\n### F10: User Abandons Midway\n\n**Trigger Timing**: User explicitly states unwillingness to continue\n\n**Detection Indicators**:\n- \"Forget it\" / \"Not writing anymore\" / \"Too complicated\" / \"Let me think about it\"\n- Abandons after prolonged unresponsiveness\n\n**Handling Process**:\n```\n1. Respect the user's decision\n2. Save all completed outputs:\n   - Paper Configuration Record\n   - Chapter Plan (completed portions)\n   - INSIGHT Collection\n   - Any completed draft sections\n3. Inform the user they can come back anytime with these materials to continue\n4. Do not actively persuade them to continue (but encouragement is fine)\n```\n\n**Save Format**:\n```markdown\n## Academic Paper — Saved Record\n\n**Topic**: {topic}\n**Progress**: Phase {N} / Step {M}\n**Completed**:\n- [x] Paper Configuration Record\n- [x/partial] Chapter Plan (completed {N}/{total} chapters)\n- [ ] Draft\n- [ ] Citation check\n- [ ] Peer review\n\n**How to Resume**: Bring this record and restart academic-paper; can continue from Phase {N}\n```\n\n---\n\n## Relationships Between Failure Paths\n\n```\nF1 (Insufficient research foundation) → Recommend deep-research → May encounter F9 (incomplete materials) upon return\nF2 (Wrong structure) → Return to Phase 2 → May cascading affect F3/F4 (word count issues)\nF5 (All citations wrong) → May be a downstream effect of F2 (wrong format selected)\nF7 (Rejection) → Analysis may require returning to F2 (structure) or F1 (foundation)\nF8 (Non-convergence) → May evolve into F10 (abandonment)\n```\n\n### F11: Desk-Reject Recovery\n\n**Trigger**: Editor rejects the paper without sending to reviewers.\n\n**Cause Classification & Recovery**:\n\n| Cause | Diagnostic Signs | Recovery Strategy |\n|-------|-----------------|-------------------|\n| **Scope Mismatch** | Editor states \"outside journal scope\" or \"not aligned with journal aims\" | Re-analyze journal scope using `top_journals_by_field.md`; identify 3 alternative journals; may need to reframe the paper's contribution |\n| **Insufficient Novelty** | \"Incremental contribution\" or \"well-established findings\" | Strengthen the novelty claim in introduction; consider additional analysis or a new dataset; reposition the paper's unique contribution |\n| **Formatting Non-Compliance** | Immediate rejection for template/length/style violations | Review target journal's author guidelines; use `formatter_agent` to reformat; resubmit (often same journal accepts after formatting fix) |\n| **Poor Opening** | No specific reason given; likely the abstract/introduction failed to hook | Rewrite abstract with the CARS model (Create A Research Space); lead with the gap, not the background; have `peer_reviewer_agent` evaluate the new opening |\n\n**General Protocol**:\n1. Do NOT take desk-reject personally — 30-50% of submissions to top journals are desk-rejected\n2. Read the editor's email carefully for any specific feedback\n3. Determine the cause category above\n4. If Scope Mismatch: pivot journal, not paper\n5. If Novelty/Opening: revise paper, then resubmit (different journal recommended)\n6. Turnaround target: 2 weeks for reformatting, 4 weeks for substantive revision\n\n---\n\n### F12: Conference-to-Journal Conversion Failure\n\n**Trigger**: Attempt to expand a published conference paper into a journal article fails review.\n\n**Common Rejection Reasons & Solutions**:\n\n| Reason | Solution |\n|--------|----------|\n| **Insufficient Extension** (< 30% new content) | Journal expects 30-50% new material beyond the conference version. Add: extended related work, additional experiments/data, deeper analysis, new discussion sections |\n| **Self-Plagiarism Flag** | Explicitly cite the conference version in the introduction: \"This paper extends our previous work [conf-citation] with...\" Use iThenticate to verify < 30% text overlap |\n| **Stale Results** | If the conference paper is > 2 years old, results may be outdated. Update experiments with current data/baselines; acknowledge temporal limitations |\n| **Missing Journal Standards** | Conference papers often lack: detailed methodology, reproducibility information, limitations section, broader impact discussion. Add all of these |\n\n**Conversion Checklist**:\n- [ ] Conference version explicitly cited in introduction\n- [ ] 30-50% genuinely new content added (not just padding)\n- [ ] Text overlap with conference version < 30% (verified by similarity tool)\n- [ ] All reviewer expectations for a journal-length paper met\n- [ ] Notation in cover letter: \"This is an extended version of [conference paper]\"\n- [ ] Check journal policy: some journals prohibit conference-to-journal conversion\n\n---\n\n## Preventive Measures\n\n| Failure Path | Preventive Measure |\n|---------|---------|\n| F1 | Phase 0 / Step 0 strictly checks research readiness |\n| F2 | structure_architect cross-validates the match between RQ and structure |\n| F3/F4 | draft_writer checks word count progress after completing each section |\n| F5 | draft_writer uses the correct format during writing |\n| F6 | abstract_bilingual writes independently based on the paper content as the standard |\n| F7 | argument_builder stress-tests arguments in Phase 3 |\n| F8 | socratic_mentor sets a dialogue cap per chapter |\n| F9 | intake_agent performs a complete materials check when detecting a handoff |\n| F10 | Maintain dialogue rhythm to avoid user fatigue |\n| F11 | Phase 7 researches target journal scope when producing the cover letter; format_agent strictly follows formatting rules |\n| F12 | intake_agent detects whether this is a conference paper expansion; calculate new content ratio early |\n\nArchive v3.1.3: 70 files, 342013 bytes\n\nFiles: agents/abstract_bilingual_agent.md (5751b), agents/argument_builder_agent.md (10529b), agents/citation_compliance_agent.md (18502b), agents/draft_writer_agent.md (31221b), agents/formatter_agent.md (32571b), agents/intake_agent.md (10372b), agents/literature_strategist_agent.md (28720b), agents/peer_reviewer_agent.md (28971b), agents/revision_coach_agent.md (12643b), agents/socratic_mentor_agent.md (24915b), agents/structure_architect_agent.md (14877b), agents/visualization_agent.md (15862b), examples/chinese_paper_example.md (21572b), examples/imrad_hei_example.md (23879b), examples/literature_review_example.md (31541b), examples/plan_mode_guided_writing.md (35170b), examples/revision_mode_example.md (20318b), examples/revision_recovery_example.md (41036b), LICENSE (19584b), references/abstract_writing_guide.md (7981b), references/academic_writing_style.md (7741b), references/anti_leakage_protocol.md (4273b), references/apa7_chinese_citation_guide.md (12510b), references/apa7_extended_guide.md (6725b), references/changelog.md (2821b), references/citation_format_switcher.md (7548b), references/credit_authorship_guide.md (13983b), references/disclosure_mode_protocol.md (12764b), references/failure_paths.md (14163b), references/funding_statement_guide.md (12193b), references/hei_domain_glossary.md (6974b), references/journal_submission_guide.md (8891b), references/latex_template_reference.md (9851b), references/mode_selection_guide.md (12396b), references/paper_structure_patterns.md (8408b), references/plan_mode_protocol.md (4839b), references/policy_anchor_disclosure_protocol.md (20797b), references/policy_anchor_table.md (21692b), references/statistical_visualization_standards.md (24247b), references/venue_disclosure_policies.md (8778b), references/vlm_figure_verification.md (3312b), references/workflow_phase_details.md (3378b), references/writing_judgment_framework.md (3336b), references/writing_quality_check.md (9235b), shared/artifact_reproducibility_pattern.md (8921b), shared/benchmark_report_pattern.md (8988b), shared/benchmark_report.schema.json (2789b), shared/collaboration_depth_rubric.md (10810b), shared/compliance_checkpoint_protocol.md (7175b), shared/compliance_report.schema.json (8314b), shared/cross_model_verification.md (11173b), shared/ground_truth_isolation_pattern.md (12649b), shared/handoff_schemas.md (46013b), shared/mode_spectrum.md (4047b), shared/prisma_trAIce_protocol.md (10415b), shared/raise_framework.md (7365b), shared/sprint_contract.schema.json (18954b), shared/style_calibration_protocol.md (7085b), SKILL.md (6149b), templates/bilingual_abstract_template.md (2943b), templates/case_study_template.md (2895b), templates/conference_paper_template.md (2363b), templates/credit_statement_template.md (4476b), templates/funding_statement_template.md (9091b), templates/imrad_template.md (4544b), templates/literature_review_template.md (2896b), templates/policy_brief_template.md (3645b), templates/revision_tracking_template.md (5210b), templates/theoretical_paper_template.md (2913b), _meta.json (133b)\n\nFile v3.1.3:SKILL.md\n\n---\nname: academic-paper\ndescription: \"12-agent academic paper writing pipeline on Hermes Agent. 10 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX/PDF output. Uses delegate_task for each agent. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見.\"\nmetadata:\n  version: \"3.1.1-hermes-1.0\"\n  last_updated: \"2026-05-16\"\n  status: active\n  adapted_from: \"imbad0202/academic-research-skills v3.1.1\"\n  adapted_for: \"Hermes Agent (deepseek-v4-pro)\"\n  task_type: open-ended\n  license: \"CC BY-NC 4.0\"\n  original_author: \"Cheng-I Wu\"\n  original_license: \"CC BY-NC 4.0\"\n  original_repo: \"https://github.com/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills\"\n  copyright: \"Copyright (c) 2026 Cheng-I Wu\"\n---\n# Academic Paper — 12-Agent Writing Pipeline (Hermes Edition)\n\n📄 **License:** [CC BY-NC 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) · Copyright (c) 2026 Cheng-I Wu  \n🔗 **Original:** [Imbad0202/academic-research-skills](https://github.com/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills) v3.1.1  \n🔄 **Adaptation:** Multi-agent pipeline implemented via `delegate_task` instead of Claude Code's internal agent system. All agent definitions, references, templates, and quality standards preserved unchanged from original. **This adaptation is distributed under the same CC BY-NC 4.0 license.**\n\n## Quick Start\n\n```\nWrite a paper on the impact of AI on higher education quality assurance\n```\n\n## Agent Team\n\n| # | Agent | Phase |\n|---|-------|-------|\n| 1 | intake_agent | Phase 0: Config interview |\n| 2 | literature_strategist_agent | Phase 1: Literature search |\n| 3 | structure_architect_agent | Phase 2: Structure/outline |\n| 4 | argument_builder_agent | Phase 3: Argument construction |\n| 5 | draft_writer_agent | Phase 4: Full draft |\n| 6 | citation_compliance_agent | Phase 5a: Citation check |\n| 7 | abstract_bilingual_agent | Phase 5b: Bilingual abstract |\n| 8 | peer_reviewer_agent | Phase 6: Peer review (max 2 loops) |\n| 9 | formatter_agent | Phase 7: Output formatting |\n| 10 | socratic_mentor_agent | Plan mode guide |\n| 11 | visualization_agent | Figures/charts |\n| 12 | revision_coach_agent | Reviewer comment parsing |\n\n## Hermes Execution Pattern\n\nAll phases use `delegate_task`. Agent files at `agents/` loaded as context.\n\n### Phase 0: Configuration\n```\ndelegate_task(goal=\"Conduct paper configuration interview: paper type, discipline, journal, citation format, output format, language, word count.\", context=\"Use agents/intake_agent.md\")\n```\n\n### Phase 1: Literature\n```\ndelegate_task(goal=\"Design search strategy, screen sources, produce annotated bibliography.\", context=\"Use agents/literature_strategist_agent.md\")\n```\n\n### Phase 2: Architecture\n```\ndelegate_task(goal=\"Select paper structure, create detailed outline with word count allocation and evidence mapping.\", context=\"Use agents/structure_architect_agent.md. Reference: references/paper_structure_patterns.md\")\n```\n⚠️ User must approve outline before Phase 3.\n\n### Phase 3: Argumentation\n```\ndelegate_task(goal=\"Build argument blueprint: claim-evidence chains, logical flow, counter-argument handling.\", context=\"Use agents/argument_builder_agent.md\")\n```\n\n### Phase 4: Drafting\n```\ndelegate_task(goal=\"Write full paper draft section by section, maintaining discipline register and word count.\", context=\"Use agents/draft_writer_agent.md. Reference: references/writing_quality_check.md\")\n```\n\n### Phase 5: Citations + Abstract (parallel)\n```\ndelegate_task(tasks=[\n    {\"goal\": \"Verify all citations: format compliance, reference list completeness, DOI checking.\", \"context\": \"Use agents/citation_compliance_agent.md\", \"toolsets\": [\"file\"]},\n    {\"goal\": \"Write bilingual abstract (zh-TW + EN) with 5-7 keywords each. Independent composition, not translation.\", \"context\": \"Use agents/abstract_bilingual_agent.md. Reference: references/abstract_writing_guide.md\", \"toolsets\": [\"file\"]}\n])\n```\n\n### Phase 6: Peer Review\n```\ndelegate_task(goal=\"Simulated double-blind review on 5 dimensions: Originality(20%), Method Rigor(25%), Evidence(25%), Argument(15%), Writing(15%). Max 2 loops.\", context=\"Use agents/peer_reviewer_agent.md\")\n```\n\n### Phase 7: Format\n```\ndelegate_task(goal=\"Convert to target format (LaTeX/DOCX/PDF/Markdown). Apply journal formatting. Generate cover letter.\", context=\"Use agents/formatter_agent.md. Reference: references/latex_template_reference.md\")\n```\n\n## 10 Modes\n\n| Mode | Trigger | Agents |\n|------|---------|--------|\n| `full` | \"Write a paper\" | All 9 core |\n| `outline-only` | \"Paper outline\" | 1→2→3 |\n| `revision` | \"Revise paper\" | 8→5→6 |\n| `abstract-only` | \"Write abstract\" | 1→7 |\n| `lit-review` | \"Literature review\" | 1→2 |\n| `format-convert` | \"Convert to LaTeX\" | 9 only |\n| `citation-check` | \"Check citations\" | 6 only |\n| `plan` | \"Guide my paper\" | 1→10→3→4 |\n| `revision-coach` | \"Parse reviews\" | 12 only |\n| `disclosure` | \"AI disclosure statement\" | 9 only |\n\n## Critical Rules\n1. ⚠️ User must confirm Paper Configuration Record before Phase 1\n2. ⚠️ Max 2 revision loops; unresolved → Acknowledged Limitations\n3. ⚠️ Every claim must have a citation or be from paper's own data\n4. ⚠️ Zero fabricated citations — every reference verified via DOI\n\n## Handoff from deep-research\n`intake_agent` auto-detects deep-research materials (RQ Brief, Bibliography, Synthesis) and skips redundant steps.\n\n## Security & Privacy\n\n**Multi-agent design disclosure:** This skill delegates writing tasks across multiple subagents. Paper content is processed through the AI provider's delegated-agent workflow. Use only with content you are comfortable having processed by AI.\n\n**Tool access:** Subagents are granted only `file` tools for reading/writing paper drafts. No terminal, web, or system tools are exposed.\n\n**Agent files:** The `agents/` directory contains academic writing prompt templates. These are task instructions for `delegate_task` — NOT system prompt overrides.\n\nFile v3.1.3:_meta.json\n\n{\n  \"ownerId\": \"kn725tchg3gp72a78w22qa07p584f267\",\n  \"slug\": \"academic-paper\",\n  \"version\": \"3.1.3\",\n  \"publishedAt\": 1778943656219\n}\n\nFile v3.1.3:references/abstract_writing_guide.md\n\n# Abstract Writing Guide\n\nUsed by `abstract_bilingual_agent`.\n\n## Abstract Types\n\n### Structured Abstract\nContains explicit labeled sections. Required by many journals in social sciences and medicine.\n\n**Sections**: Background, Purpose/Objective, Method, Results/Findings, Conclusion/Implications\n\n### Unstructured Abstract\nA single flowing paragraph without labels. Common in humanities and some social sciences.\n\n**Flow**: Context → Problem → Purpose → Method → Key Findings → Implications\n\n### Extended Abstract\nLonger (500-1,000 words), used for conference submissions. May include brief literature review and preliminary results.\n\n## English Abstract Guidelines\n\n### Word Count\n- Standard: 150-250 words (check journal requirements)\n- Conference: 200-500 words (check CFP)\n- Dissertation: up to 350 words\n\n### Structure (5-Component Model)\n\n#### Component 1: Background (1-2 sentences)\nEstablish context and identify the problem.\n\n**Patterns**:\n- \"[Topic] has become increasingly important because...\"\n- \"Despite growing interest in [topic], little is known about...\"\n- \"Recent developments in [field] have raised questions about...\"\n\n**Avoid**:\n- Starting with \"This paper...\" (too abrupt)\n- Generic statements (\"Education is important\")\n- Overly long historical context\n\n#### Component 2: Purpose (1 sentence)\nState the specific objective or research question.\n\n**Patterns**:\n- \"This study examines [what] in [context].\"\n- \"The purpose of this research is to [verb] [object].\"\n- \"This paper proposes [framework/model] for [application].\"\n\n#### Component 3: Method (1-2 sentences)\nDescribe the approach, data, and analysis.\n\n**Patterns**:\n- \"Using [method], this study analyzed [data] from [source].\"\n- \"A [design] approach was employed, involving [participants/data].\"\n- \"Data were collected through [instrument] and analyzed using [technique].\"\n\n#### Component 4: Findings (2-3 sentences)\nPresent the key results — be specific.\n\n**Patterns**:\n- \"The results indicate that [finding 1]. Additionally, [finding 2].\"\n- \"Three key findings emerged: (a) [finding 1], (b) [finding 2], and (c) [finding 3].\"\n- \"The analysis revealed [main finding], with [specific metric/detail].\"\n\n**Include**:\n- Specific numbers when available (percentages, effect sizes)\n- The most important findings (not all findings)\n\n**Avoid**:\n- \"Results will be discussed\" (the abstract IS the discussion)\n- Vague findings (\"significant results were found\")\n\n#### Component 5: Implications (1-2 sentences)\nState the significance, practical implications, or recommendations.\n\n**Patterns**:\n- \"These findings have implications for [practice/policy/theory].\"\n- \"The results suggest that [stakeholders] should [action].\"\n- \"This research contributes to [field] by [contribution].\"\n\n### Example (English, Education)\n\n> Declining enrollment poses existential challenges for private higher education institutions in Taiwan, yet institutional responses remain poorly understood. This study examines the strategic adaptation patterns of 12 private universities experiencing enrollment declines exceeding 20% between 2018 and 2023. Using a multiple case study design, we analyzed institutional documents, enrollment data, and 36 semi-structured interviews with administrators. Three distinct adaptation strategies emerged: program consolidation (n = 5), niche specialization (n = 4), and merger pursuit (n = 3). Institutions adopting niche specialization demonstrated the highest enrollment recovery rates (mean = 12.3%). However, successful adaptation was contingent upon early action — institutions that initiated strategic changes within two years of enrollment decline showed significantly better outcomes than late movers (p < .01). These findings suggest that private institutions should adopt proactive monitoring systems and consider niche specialization as a primary survival strategy.\n>\n> **Keywords**: higher education, enrollment decline, private universities, institutional strategy, Taiwan\n\n## Traditional Chinese Abstract Guidelines\n\n### Word Count\n- Standard: 300-500 characters\n- Conference: 300-800 characters\n- Dissertation: 500-1,000 characters\n\n### Structure (5-Component Model)\n\n#### Component 1: Research Background (1-2 sentences)\n**Patterns**:\n- \"As... has become an important issue for...\"\n- \"In the context of..., ... faces the challenge of...\"\n- \"Although... has received widespread attention, ... still lacks systematic research.\"\n\n#### Component 2: Research Purpose (1 sentence)\n**Patterns**:\n- \"This study aims to explore...\"\n- \"This paper takes... as subjects and analyzes the impact of...\"\n- \"The purpose of this study is to construct a framework for...\"\n\n#### Component 3: Research Method (1-2 sentences)\n**Patterns**:\n- \"This study employs... research method, with... as subjects, collecting data through...\"\n- \"Using... to analyze... data.\"\n\n#### Component 4: Research Findings (2-3 sentences)\n**Patterns**:\n- \"The results found: (1)...; (2)...; (3)...\"\n- \"The analysis results show that... Furthermore,...\"\n\n#### Component 5: Research Significance (1-2 sentences)\n**Patterns**:\n- \"This study has both theoretical and practical contributions to...\"\n- \"The results can serve as a reference for... and provide specific recommendations for...\"\n\n### Example (Chinese, Higher Education Field)\n\n> Amid the trend of declining birth rates, Taiwan's private universities face enrollment difficulties, yet existing research on institutional response strategies remains limited. This study aims to explore the strategic adaptation patterns of 12 private universities that experienced enrollment declines exceeding 20% between 2018 and 2023. The study employs a multiple case study design, analyzing institutional development plans, enrollment data, and conducting 36 semi-structured interviews with administrators. Three primary adaptation strategies were identified: program consolidation (5 institutions), niche specialization (4 institutions), and merger pursuit (3 institutions). Among these, institutions adopting niche specialization demonstrated the highest enrollment recovery rates (mean = 12.3%). The study also found that timing of adaptation is critical to success -- institutions that initiated strategic adjustments within two years of enrollment decline showed significantly better outcomes than late movers. The results suggest that private universities should establish proactive monitoring mechanisms and adopt niche specialization as a primary sustainability strategy.\n>\n> **Keywords**: higher education, enrollment decline, private university, institutional strategy, Taiwan\n\n## Keywords Selection\n\n### English Keywords\n1. **Core concepts** — main variables or constructs (2-3)\n2. **Context** — geographical, institutional, or temporal (1-2)\n3. **Method** — if distinctive (0-1)\n4. **Field** — discipline or sub-field (1)\n\n**Rules**:\n- Lowercase (unless proper nouns)\n- Complement the title (don't repeat title words verbatim)\n- Use established terms (check journal's keyword list if available)\n- 5-7 keywords total\n\n### Chinese Keywords\n1. **Core concepts** — main variables or constructs (2-3)\n2. **Research context** — geographical, institutional, or temporal (1-2)\n3. **Research method** — if distinctive (0-1)\n4. **Academic field** — discipline or sub-field (1)\n\n**Rules**:\n- Use formal academic terminology\n- Avoid completely duplicating the title\n- May reference the National Central Library Chinese Subject Headings\n- 5-7 keywords\n\n## Bilingual Abstract Quality Checklist\n\n| Check | ✓ |\n|-------|---|\n| Both abstracts cover all 5 components | |\n| English: 150-300 words | |\n| Chinese: 300-500 characters | |\n| Abstracts are independently written (not translated) | |\n| Key findings match between languages | |\n| Quantitative data consistent between versions | |\n| Keywords: 5-7 per language | |\n| Keywords complement (not duplicate) the title | |\n| No citations in the abstract | |\n| No abbreviations undefined in the abstract | |\n\nFile v3.1.3:references/academic_writing_style.md\n\n# Academic Writing Style Guide\n\nUsed by `draft_writer_agent` and `peer_reviewer_agent`.\n\n## Core Principles\n\n### 1. Precision\n- Use the most specific term available\n- Define technical terms on first use\n- Avoid ambiguous pronouns (\"this,\" \"it\") without clear antecedents\n\n### 2. Conciseness\n- Eliminate filler words and redundant phrases\n- One idea per sentence (or clearly connected ideas)\n- Prefer short sentences for complex ideas\n\n### 3. Objectivity\n- Base claims on evidence, not opinion\n- Use hedging for uncertain claims\n- Acknowledge limitations and alternative interpretations\n\n### 4. Formality\n- Use full forms (\"do not\" over \"don't\")\n- Use formal academic vocabulary; reserve colloquialisms and slang for informal writing\n- Use third person unless discipline conventions allow first person\n\n## Register Adjustment by Discipline\n\n### Sciences (Natural, Applied)\n```\nRegister: Formal, impersonal, method-focused\nVoice: Passive voice common (\"was measured,\" \"were analyzed\")\nTerminology: Precise measurements, SI units, statistical notation\nExample: \"The sample was heated to 350°C for 2 hours, yielding a conversion rate of 87.3% (SD = 2.1).\"\n```\n\n### Social Sciences\n```\nRegister: Formal, theory-informed, participant-aware\nVoice: Active voice encouraged, first person for researcher decisions\nTerminology: Theoretical constructs, operationalized variables\nExample: \"We employed semi-structured interviews to explore how participants understood institutional change (N = 24).\"\n```\n\n### Humanities\n```\nRegister: Formal, argument-driven, interpretive\nVoice: First person acceptable for arguments, active voice\nTerminology: Close reading vocabulary, theoretical language\nExample: \"I argue that the text's spatial metaphors reveal an underlying anxiety about institutional permanence.\"\n```\n\n### Engineering / CS\n```\nRegister: Formal, problem-solution oriented, specification-precise\nVoice: Passive common for methods, active for contributions\nTerminology: Technical specifications, performance metrics\nExample: \"The proposed algorithm achieves O(n log n) complexity, outperforming the baseline by 34% on the benchmark dataset.\"\n```\n\n### Education\n```\nRegister: Formal, practice-oriented, stakeholder-aware\nVoice: Active voice, first person for reflexive practice\nTerminology: Pedagogical concepts, assessment language\nExample: \"The intervention improved student metacognitive awareness, as evidenced by a significant increase in self-regulation scores (t(45) = 3.21, p = .002, d = 0.72).\"\n```\n\n### Medicine / Health\n```\nRegister: Formal, evidence-hierarchy conscious, clinical precision\nVoice: Passive for methods, active for findings\nTerminology: Clinical terms, diagnostic criteria, statistical reporting\nExample: \"Patients receiving the intervention showed a 40% reduction in readmission rates (RR = 0.60, 95% CI [0.45, 0.80], p = .001).\"\n```\n\n## Hedging and Strength Language\n\n### Hedging (for uncertain or qualified claims)\n| Strength | Hedging Devices | Example |\n|----------|----------------|---------|\n| Weak | may, might, could, possibly | \"This may suggest a correlation.\" |\n| Moderate | suggests, indicates, appears | \"The data suggest a positive trend.\" |\n| Strong | demonstrates, establishes, confirms | \"The evidence demonstrates a clear link.\" |\n\n### When to Hedge\n- Results that need replication\n- Causal claims from correlational data\n- Generalizations from limited samples\n- Interpretations with alternative explanations\n\n### When NOT to Hedge\n- Reporting factual data: \"The response rate was 78%.\" (not \"appeared to be\")\n- Describing methodology: \"We used thematic analysis.\" (not \"we attempted to use\")\n- Well-established facts: \"Earth orbits the Sun.\" (not \"may orbit\")\n\n## Transition Words and Phrases\n\n### Addition\nmoreover, furthermore, in addition, additionally, similarly, likewise\n\n### Contrast\nhowever, nevertheless, in contrast, on the other hand, conversely, whereas\n\n### Cause/Effect\ntherefore, consequently, as a result, thus, hence, accordingly\n\n### Example\nfor example, for instance, specifically, in particular, such as, namely\n\n### Sequence\nfirst, second, third, subsequently, finally, meanwhile\n\n### Summary\nin summary, to conclude, overall, taken together, in short\n\n### Concession\nalthough, despite, while, granted that, notwithstanding\n\n## Paragraph Construction\n\n### Standard Academic Paragraph (TEEL)\n1. **T**opic sentence — states the paragraph's main point\n2. **E**vidence — data, citations, examples that support the point\n3. **E**xplanation — interpret the evidence, connect to argument\n4. **L**ink — connect to the next paragraph or back to thesis\n\n### Example\n> **[T]** AI-assisted quality assurance has shown promise in improving evaluation consistency across institutions. **[E]** Smith (2024) found that institutions using AI tools reported a 23% reduction in inter-rater variance, while Chen and Wang (2023) documented improved agreement on scoring rubrics (κ = 0.82 vs. 0.64). **[E]** These findings suggest that algorithmic assistance can mitigate the subjective biases inherent in human evaluation, particularly when assessors have varying levels of experience. **[L]** However, the reliance on AI tools also raises concerns about the loss of contextual judgment, which the following section addresses.\n\n## Common Style Errors\n\n### Wordiness\n| Wordy | Concise |\n|-------|---------|\n| in order to | to |\n| due to the fact that | because |\n| a large number of | many |\n| at the present time | currently / now |\n| it is important to note that | notably |\n| in the event that | if |\n| has the ability to | can |\n| with regard to | regarding / about |\n| in spite of the fact that | despite / although |\n| conduct an investigation of | investigate |\n\n### Vague Language\n| Vague | Precise |\n|-------|---------|\n| \"many studies\" | \"several studies (e.g., Chen, 2023; Smith, 2024)\" |\n| \"a significant impact\" | \"a 23% increase in retention rates\" |\n| \"in recent years\" | \"since 2020\" or \"over the past five years\" |\n| \"some researchers\" | Name them with citations |\n| \"it is well known that\" | Cite the source or remove |\n\n### Tense Usage\n| Section | Tense | Example |\n|---------|-------|---------|\n| Literature review (reporting findings) | Past | \"Smith (2024) found that...\" |\n| Literature review (ongoing state) | Present | \"The theory posits that...\" |\n| Methodology | Past | \"Data were collected through...\" |\n| Results | Past | \"The analysis revealed...\" |\n| Discussion (interpreting) | Present | \"These findings suggest...\" |\n| Conclusion (implications) | Present/Future | \"This has implications for... / Future research should...\" |\n\n## Chinese Academic Writing (zh-TW) Conventions\n\n### Register\n- Use written/formal language; avoid colloquial expressions\n- Prefer active voice (Chinese rarely uses passive)\n- Mainly short sentences; avoid overly long subordinate clauses\n- Use \"this study\" (ben yan jiu) rather than \"we\" (wo men)\n\n### Common Academic Expressions\n| English | Romanized Chinese |\n|------|------|\n| This study aims to | Ben Yan Jiu Zhi Zai |\n| The findings indicate | Yan Jiu Jie Guo Xian Shi |\n| It is worth noting | Zhi De Zhu Yi De Shi |\n| In conclusion | Zong Shang Suo Shu |\n| Based on the above analysis | Gen Ju Shang Shu Fen Xi |\n| Further research is needed | Wei Lai Yan Jiu Ke Jin Yi Bu Tan Tao |\n\n### Avoiding Translationese\n- Incorrect: \"was found to be\" (bei fa xian shi) → Correct: \"Results show\" (jie guo xian shi)\n- Incorrect: \"This is because\" (zhe shi yin wei) → Correct: \"The reason lies in\" (yuan yin zai yu)\n- Incorrect: \"In the aspect of...\" (zai...fang mian) → Correct: State directly\n- Incorrect: \"It is worth being pointed out that\" (zhi de bei zhi chu de shi) → Correct: \"It is worth noting that\" (zhi de zhu yi de shi)\n\nFile v3.1.3:references/anti_leakage_protocol.md\n\n# Anti-Leakage Protocol (Knowledge Isolation)\n\n**Status**: v3.3\n**Used by**: `draft_writer_agent`, `report_compiler_agent`\n**Source**: Adapted from PaperOrchestra (Song et al., 2026, Appendix D.4)\n\n---\n\n## Purpose\n\nWhen the user provides comprehensive research materials (RQ Brief, Synthesis Report, Annotated Bibliography, experimental data), the writing agent should construct the paper **primarily from those materials**, not from LLM parametric memory. This prevents:\n\n1. **Methodology fabrication (Failure Mode 6)**: The LLM writes a plausible Methods section from training data rather than the user's actual procedure\n2. **Implicit knowledge leakage**: The LLM fills gaps with memorized content that may be inaccurate, outdated, or from a different context\n3. **Unintentional plagiarism**: The LLM reproduces near-verbatim passages from training data\n\n---\n\n## Protocol\n\n### When to activate\n\nActivate when ALL of the following are true:\n- The user has provided research materials via the pipeline handoff (RQ Brief + Synthesis Report + Annotated Bibliography)\n- The paper is in `full` or `revision` mode (not `plan` or `outline-only`)\n- The materials are substantive (not placeholder stubs)\n\n### When NOT to activate\n\nDo NOT activate when:\n- The user is in `plan` or `socratic` mode (exploratory — LLM knowledge is expected)\n- The materials are minimal (e.g., only a RQ Brief with no bibliography)\n- The user explicitly requests the LLM to supplement with its own knowledge\n\n### Prompt insertion\n\nWhen activated, prepend the following to the draft_writer_agent's working context:\n\n```\n## Knowledge Isolation Directive\n\nYou are writing this paper based on the research materials provided in this session:\n- RQ Brief, Synthesis Report, and Annotated Bibliography (from deep-research)\n- Any additional materials the user has provided (experimental logs, datasets, prior drafts)\n\nPriority rules:\n1. PREFER session materials over your parametric knowledge for all factual claims\n2. Every claim in the paper MUST be traceable to a source in the Annotated Bibliography or user-provided data\n3. If the materials do not cover a topic the outline requires, flag it as [MATERIAL GAP] rather than filling from memory\n4. Do NOT introduce references not present in the Annotated Bibliography unless explicitly asked by the user\n5. The Methods section must describe ONLY what is documented in the user's materials — do not infer or interpolate experimental procedures\n\nThis is NOT a prohibition on using language skills or academic writing knowledge.\nYou may use your knowledge of academic conventions, writing style, logical argumentation,\nand discipline norms. The restriction applies only to FACTUAL CONTENT — claims, citations,\ndata, and methodology descriptions must come from session materials.\n```\n\n### [MATERIAL GAP] handling\n\n> **Tag vocabulary.** The `[MATERIAL GAP]`, `[WEAK EVIDENCE]`, `[GAP]` tags used throughout this protocol are canonically defined in [`shared/compliance_checkpoint_protocol.md#canonical-gap-tag-vocabulary`](../../shared/compliance_checkpoint_protocol.md#canonical-gap-tag-vocabulary). This section describes how the anti-leakage writing-time flag interacts with that vocabulary during manuscript production.\n\nWhen a `[MATERIAL GAP]` is flagged:\n1. The gap is surfaced at the next checkpoint\n2. The user can provide additional materials, or authorize LLM supplementation for that specific gap\n3. If supplemented: the gap section is tagged `[LLM-SUPPLEMENTED]` in the draft metadata for integrity review\n\n---\n\n## Relationship to existing checks\n\n| Check | What it catches | Anti-leakage adds |\n|-------|----------------|-------------------|\n| Integrity gate (Stage 2.5) | Fabricated citations post-hoc | Prevents fabrication at writing time |\n| Failure Mode 6 (Methodology fabrication) | Methods don't match actual procedures | Prevents LLM from inventing procedures |\n| Writing Quality Check | AI-typical phrasing patterns | Anti-leakage prevents AI-typical *content* (as opposed to style) |\n\n---\n\n## References\n\n- Song, Y. et al. (2026). PaperOrchestra. *arXiv:2604.05018*. Appendix D.4 (Anti-Leakage Prompt).\n- Lu, C. et al. (2026). Towards end-to-end automation of AI research. *Nature* 651, 914-919. — Mode 6 (Methodology fabrication).\n\nFile v3.1.3:references/apa7_chinese_citation_guide.md\n\n# APA 7.0 Complete Guide for Chinese Citations\n\nA Chinese APA 7.0 citation format guide based on Taiwan academic conventions. This guide is a Chinese-language extension of `apa7_extended_guide.md`, used by `citation_compliance_agent`, `draft_writer_agent`, and `formatter_agent`.\n\n---\n\n## Chinese Journal Articles\n\n### Basic Format\n\n```\nAuthor1, Author2 (Year). Article title. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx\n```\n\n### Examples\n\n**Single author**:\n```\nWang, Da-Ming (2024). The impact of declining birthrate on private university management strategies. Journal of Higher Education, 15(2), 45-68. https://doi.org/10.6152/jhe.2024.0502.03\n```\n\n**Two authors**:\n```\nWang, Da-Ming, & Li, Xiao-Hua (2024). The evolution and prospects of Taiwan's higher education quality assurance system. Bulletin of Educational Research, 70(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.3966/102887082024037001001\n```\n\n**Three or more authors**:\n```\nWang, Da-Ming, Li, Xiao-Hua, Zhang, San-Feng, Chen, Si-Hai, & Lin, Wu-Zhou (2023). A meta-analysis of blended learning models on university student learning outcomes. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 55(2), 201-228. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202312_55(2).0002\n```\n\n**In-text citations**:\n- Single author: Wang (2024) states... / ...(Wang, 2024)\n- Two authors: Wang and Li (2024)... / ...(Wang & Li, 2024)\n- Three or more (first time): Wang et al. (2023)... / ...(Wang et al., 2023)\n- Three or more (subsequent): Wang et al. (2023)...\n\n---\n\n## Chinese Books\n\n### Basic Format\n\n```\nAuthor (Year). Book title. Publisher.\n```\n\n### Examples\n\n**Single author**:\n```\nZhang, San (2023). A history of Taiwan's higher education development. Wu-Nan Books.\n```\n\n**Edited book**:\n```\nWang, Wu (Ed.) (2023). Higher education quality management: Theory and practice. Higher Education Publishing.\n```\n\n**Multiple editions**:\n```\nLin, Liu (2024). Educational research methods (5th ed.). Psychological Publishing.\n```\n\n**Translated book**:\n```\nCreswell, J. W. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (F.-F. Zhang, Trans.; 5th ed.). Scholarly Cultural Enterprise. (Original work published 2018)\n```\n\n**In-text citations**:\n- Zhang (2023) mentions in his work...\n- ...(Zhang, 2023, p. 45-48)\n- Translated book: Creswell (2018/2023)...\n\n---\n\n## Chinese Book Chapters\n\n### Basic Format\n\n```\nChapter author (Year). Chapter title. In Editor name (Ed.), Book title (pp. Pages). Publisher.\n```\n\n### Examples\n\n```\nLi, Si (2023). The evolution of quality assurance systems. In W. Wang (Ed.), Higher education quality management: Theory and practice (pp. 45-78). Higher Education Publishing.\n```\n\n```\nChen, Mei-Ling (2024). The practice of university social responsibility. In Z.-C. Lin & S.-L. Huang (Eds.), New trends in Taiwan's university governance (pp. 112-145). Wu-Nan Books.\n```\n\n---\n\n## Chinese Theses and Dissertations\n\n### Basic Format\n\n```\nAuthor (Year). Thesis title (Unpublished master's/doctoral dissertation). University name.\n```\n\n### Examples\n\n**Unpublished thesis/dissertation**:\n```\nChen, Liu (2024). The impact of AI-assisted instruction on student learning outcomes: A case study of National Taiwan University (Unpublished master's thesis). National Taiwan University.\n```\n\n**Published (with DOI or database)**:\n```\nHuang, Qi (2023). A case study of private university transformation strategies (Doctoral dissertation, National Chengchi University). National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/xxxxx\n```\n\n**In-text citations**:\n- Chen (2024) found in their study...\n- ...(Chen, 2024)\n\n---\n\n## Government Publications\n\n### Basic Format\n\n```\nOrganization name (Year). Publication title. https://url\n```\n\n### Examples\n\n**Government report**:\n```\nMinistry of Education (2024). Academic Year 113 higher education institution transparency platform statistics. https://udb.moe.edu.tw/\n```\n\n**Legislation**:\n```\nMinistry of Education (2023). University Act (amended June 28, 2023). Laws and Regulations Database of the Republic of China. https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0030001\n```\n\n**Accreditation report**:\n```\nHigher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan (2024). Third-cycle institutional accreditation implementation plan (Academic Years 112-114). https://www.heeact.edu.tw/\n```\n\n**In-text citations**:\n- Ministry of Education (2024) statistics show...\n- ...(Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan, 2024)\n\n---\n\n## Conference Papers\n\n### Basic Format\n\n```\nAuthor (Year, Month). Paper title [Conference paper]. Conference name, Location.\n```\n\n### Examples\n\n```\nLin, Ba (2024, November). The impact of generative AI on higher education teaching [Conference paper]. 2024 Taiwan Education Academic Conference, Taipei, Taiwan.\n```\n\n---\n\n## Online Resources\n\n### Basic Format\n\n```\nAuthor or organization (Year). Webpage title. Website name. https://url\n```\n\n### Examples\n\n```\nNational Development Council (2024). Population projections (2024 to 2070). https://pop-proj.ndc.gov.tw/\n```\n\n```\nUniversity TW (2024, March 15). Analysis of Academic Year 113 university admission quotas. University TW website. https://www.unews.com.tw/\n```\n\n---\n\n## Mixed Chinese-English Citation Rules\n\n### Reference List Ordering\n\n**Option A (Recommended): Separate Chinese and English**\n- Chinese references listed first, ordered by author surname stroke count\n- English references listed after, ordered alphabetically by author surname\n- Separated by two headings: \"Chinese References\" and \"English References\"\n\n**Option B: Mixed Chinese-English Ordering**\n- All Chinese and English references listed together\n- Chinese ordered by stroke count, English by alphabetical order\n- Chinese entries placed at the corresponding phonetic/pinyin letter position (or all Chinese first)\n\n### In-Text Citation Format Differences\n\n| Element | Chinese | English |\n|------|------|------|\n| Parentheses | Full-width () | Half-width () |\n| Multiple author connector | Enumeration comma | & |\n| Three or more authors | et al. (Chinese equivalent) | et al. |\n| Year format | CE year | CE year |\n| Direct quote page | p. (Chinese format) | p. 45 |\n| Multi-page quote | pp. (Chinese format) | pp. 45-48 |\n\n### Mixed Citation Example (In-Text)\n\n```\nIn recent years, the impact of declining birthrates on Taiwan's higher education has received widespread attention (Wang, 2024; Chen & Wang, 2023).\nSmith et al. (2024) and Wang et al. (2023) both indicated that private universities face particularly severe enrollment pressure.\n```\n\n### Mixed Reference List Example (Option A)\n\n```\nReferences\n\nI. Chinese References\n\nWang, Da-Ming (2024). The impact of declining birthrate on private university management strategies. Journal of Higher Education, 15(2), 45-68.\n    https://doi.org/10.6152/jhe.2024.0502.03\nLi, Xiao-Hua, & Zhang, San-Feng (2023). The evolution of Taiwan's higher education quality assurance system. Educational Policy Forum, 26(3), 1-30.\nHigher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan (2024). Third-cycle institutional accreditation implementation plan.\n    https://www.heeact.edu.tw/\nMinistry of Education (2024). Academic Year 113 higher education institution transparency platform statistics. https://udb.moe.edu.tw/\n\nII. English References\n\nChen, L., & Wang, T. (2023). Quality assurance in East Asian higher education: A\n    comparative study. Higher Education, 85(3), 567-589.\n    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01012-4\nSmith, J. A., Jones, B. C., & Brown, D. E. (2024). The impact of declining birth\n    rates on private university sustainability. Studies in Higher Education, 49(2),\n    234-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2301234\n```\n\n---\n\n## TSSCI Journal-Specific Conventions\n\nSome Taiwan Social Sciences Citation Index (TSSCI) journals have their own citation format requirements.\n\n### Common Education Journal Format Comparison\n\n| Journal | Citation Format | Special Requirements |\n|------|---------|---------|\n| Bulletin of Educational Research | APA 7th Chinese edition | Separate Chinese and English |\n| Bulletin of Educational Psychology | APA 7th Chinese edition | Separate Chinese and English; English translation of Chinese references required |\n| Journal of Research in Education Sciences | APA 7th Chinese edition | Separate Chinese and English |\n| Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly | APA 7th Chinese edition | Mixed Chinese-English ordering |\n| Educational Policy Forum | APA 7th Chinese edition | Separate Chinese and English; page format uses Chinese page notation |\n| Journal of Higher Education | APA 7th Chinese edition | Separate Chinese and English |\n| Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education | APA 7th Chinese edition | Separate Chinese and English |\n\n### Submission Notes\n\n1. **Always check the target journal's submission guidelines** — the above are general conventions only\n2. Some journals require English translations appended to Chinese references (in square brackets)\n3. Some journals require romanized transliteration for all Chinese references\n4. DOI format varies slightly by journal (some require https://doi.org/, others only doi:)\n\n---\n\n## Common Chinese Citation Errors\n\n### 1. Author Name Format\n\n| Error | Correct | Explanation |\n|------|------|------|\n| Da-Ming Wang (2024) | Wang, Da-Ming (2024) | Chinese names should follow the citation format conventions |\n| Wang, Da-Ming (2024) in English format | Use Chinese name in Chinese references | Use Chinese names for Chinese references |\n| Wang, Li (2024) without separator | Wang & Li (2024) | Use appropriate connector between authors |\n\n### 2. Year Format\n\n| Error | Correct | Explanation |\n|------|------|------|\n| Wang (ROC Year 113) | Wang (2024) | APA always uses CE years |\n| Wang (2024 year) | Wang (2024) | Do not add the word \"year\" after the number |\n| Wang, 2024 without parentheses | Wang (2024) | Use proper parentheses |\n\n### 3. Punctuation\n\n| Error | Correct | Explanation |\n|------|------|------|\n| Period after journal name | Comma after journal name | Use comma after journal name to connect to volume/issue |\n| \"p.\" before page numbers in journal articles | Page numbers only | Do not add page indicator before page numbers in journal article references |\n| Period after DOI/URL | No punctuation after DOI/URL | No period at the end of DOI/URL |\n\n### 4. Book Publication Information\n\n| Error | Correct | Explanation |\n|------|------|------|\n| Taipei: Publisher. | Publisher. | APA 7 does not require publication location |\n| Abbreviated publisher name | Full publisher name. | Use the publisher's full name |\n\n### 5. Translated Book Citations\n\n| Error | Correct |\n|------|------|\n| Creswell, translated by Zhang (2023) | Creswell, J. W. (2023). Book title (F.-F. Zhang, Trans.; 5th ed.). Publisher. (Original work published 2018) |\n\n---\n\n## Special Situation Handling\n\n### Same Author, Multiple Works in the Same Year\n\n```\nIn-text: Wang (2024a)... Wang (2024b)...\n\nReferences:\nWang (2024a). First paper title. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Pages.\nWang (2024b). Second paper title. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Pages.\n```\n\n### Institutional Authors\n\n```\nIn-text: Ministry of Education (2024)... / ...(Ministry of Education, 2024)\nFirst mention: Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan [HEEACT] (2024)...\nSubsequent: HEEACT (2024)...\n```\n\n### Secondary Citations (Indirect Citations)\n\n```\nIn-text: Wang's research (as cited in Li, 2024) indicates...\nReferences: Only list Li (2024); do not list Wang's original work\n```\n\n### Citing AI-Generated Content\n\n```\nOpenAI (2024). ChatGPT (Version GPT-4) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com\n\nAnthropic (2024). Claude (Version 3.5 Sonnet) [Large language model]. https://claude.ai\n```\n\n---\n\n## Quick Checklist\n\nAfter completing the reference list, check each item:\n\n- [ ] All in-text citations have corresponding reference list entries\n- [ ] All reference list entries have in-text citations\n- [ ] Chinese uses full-width punctuation; English uses half-width punctuation\n- [ ] Authors are connected with enumeration comma (Chinese) or & symbol (English)\n- [ ] Years consistently use CE years\n- [ ] No period at the end of DOI/URL\n- [ ] Chinese and English reference ordering is correct (stroke count / alphabetical)\n- [ ] Translated books include original publication year\n- [ ] Institutional authors use full names (abbreviation may be appended on first mention)\n- [ ] Book format complies with APA 7 (no publication location)\n\nFile v3.1.3:references/apa7_extended_guide.md\n\n# APA 7th Edition — Extended Guide for Academic Paper Writing\n\nExtends `deep-research/references/apa7_style_guide.md` with additional rules specific to full paper writing (vs. research reports).\n\n## Paper-Specific APA Rules\n\n### Title Page (Student vs. Professional)\n\n**Professional Paper**:\n```\nTitle of Paper (Bold, Centered, Title Case)\n[blank line]\nAuthor Name(s)\nAffiliation(s)\n[blank line]\nAuthor Note (optional)\n```\n\n**Student Paper**:\n```\nTitle of Paper (Bold, Centered, Title Case)\n[blank line]\nAuthor Name\nDepartment, Institution\nCourse Number: Course Name\nInstructor Name\nDue Date\n```\n\n### Running Head\n- Professional papers: shortened title (max 50 chars), ALL CAPS, left-aligned header\n- Student papers: no running head required (APA 7 change from 6th ed.)\n\n### Abstract Page\n- Heading: \"Abstract\" (centered, bold, not indented)\n- Single paragraph, no indent\n- 150-250 words (journal may specify differently)\n- Keywords line: \"Keywords:\" in italics, followed by lowercase keywords separated by commas\n\n### Section Headings (Detailed)\n\n| Level | Format | Example |\n|-------|--------|---------|\n| 1 | Centered, Bold, Title Case | **Introduction** |\n| 2 | Left-Aligned, Bold, Title Case | **Theoretical Framework** |\n| 3 | Left-Aligned, Bold Italic, Title Case | ***Constructivist Perspective*** |\n| 4 | Indented, Bold, Title Case, Period. | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;**Social Constructivism.** Text continues... |\n| 5 | Indented, Bold Italic, Title Case, Period. | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;***Vygotsky's Zone.*** Text continues... |\n\n**Usage rules**:\n- Don't skip levels (e.g., don't go from Level 1 to Level 3)\n- Introduction doesn't need a Level 1 heading (it's assumed)\n- Subsections need at least 2 sibling sections\n\n## Extended Citation Rules\n\n### Works with 21+ Authors\nList first 19 authors, then \"...\" (ellipsis), then final author:\n```\nAuthor, A., Author, B., Author, C., Author, D., Author, E.,\nAuthor, F., Author, G., Author, H., Author, I., Author, J.,\nAuthor, K., Author, L., Author, M., Author, N., Author, O.,\nAuthor, P., Author, Q., Author, R., Author, S., ... Author, Z. (Year).\n```\n\n### Group Authors\n- First citation: Full name (Abbreviation) — e.g., World Health Organization (WHO)\n- Subsequent: Abbreviation only — e.g., WHO\n- In reference list: spell out full name\n\n### Works with No Author\n- Use the title in the author position\n- In-text: use short title in quotes (\"Short Title,\" Year)\n- In reference list: alphabetize by the first significant word of the title\n\n### Personal Communications\n- In-text only: (J. Smith, personal communication, March 15, 2024)\n- NOT in reference list (not recoverable data)\n\n### Classical Works\n- No date needed for well-known classical works\n- Use original publication date / translation date: (Aristotle, trans. 1925)\n\n### Legal References\n- Follow *Bluebook* format for legal materials\n- Court cases italicized: *Brown v. Board of Education* (1954)\n\n## Extended Reference Formats\n\n### Software / App\n```\nAuthor, A. A. (Year). Title of software (Version X.X) [Computer software]. Publisher. URL\n```\n\n### Social Media\n```\nAuthor [@handle]. (Year, Month Day). Content of post up to first 20 words [Type of post]. Platform. URL\n```\n\n### Podcast Episode\n```\nHost, A. A. (Host). (Year, Month Day). Episode title (No. X) [Audio podcast episode]. In Podcast name. Publisher. URL\n```\n\n### YouTube Video\n```\nAuthor, A. A. [Screen name]. (Year, Month Day). Title of video [Video]. YouTube. URL\n```\n\n### Preprint\n```\nAuthor, A. A. (Year). Title of preprint. Name of Preprint Archive. https://doi.org/xxxxx\n```\n\n### AI-Generated Content (APA Guidance)\n```\nWhen citing AI-generated text:\nOpenAI. (2024). ChatGPT (Version 4) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com\nNote: Describe the prompt in the text. AI output is not recoverable,\nso provide the prompt and relevant output in appendix if needed.\n```\n\n## Tables and Figures (Extended)\n\n### Table Formatting\n```\nTable 1\n\nDescriptive Title in Italic Title Case\n\nColumn Head    Column Head    Column Head\n─────────────────────────────────────────\nRow 1 data     Row 1 data     Row 1 data\nRow 2 data     Row 2 data     Row 2 data\n─────────────────────────────────────────\n\nNote. General note. Specific note for a column or cell.\na Specific note. b Specific note.\n* p < .05. ** p < .01. *** p < .001.\n```\n\n### Figure Formatting\n```\nFigure 1\n\nDescriptive Title in Italic Title Case\n\n[Figure content]\n\nNote. Description and any necessary explanation.\nAdapted from \"Title,\" by A. Author, Year, Journal, Volume, p. X\n(https://doi.org/xxxxx). Copyright Year by Copyright Holder.\n```\n\n## Numbers and Statistics\n\n### Statistical Notation\n- Italicize statistical symbols: *M*, *SD*, *t*, *F*, *p*, *N*, *n*, *r*, *R²*\n- Report exact *p* values: *p* = .032 (not *p* < .05), unless *p* < .001\n- Effect sizes: always report (Cohen's *d*, η², *r*)\n- Confidence intervals: 95% CI [lower, upper]\n\n### Decimal Places\n| Statistic | Decimal Places |\n|-----------|---------------|\n| Proportions, correlations, inferential statistics | 2 |\n| Percentages | 0 or 1 |\n| Means, SDs | 2 (or match measurement precision) |\n| *p* values | 3 (report exa\n\nArchive v3.1.2: 70 files, 341753 bytes\n\nFiles: agents/abstract_bilingual_agent.md (5751b), agents/argument_builder_agent.md (10529b), agents/citation_compliance_agent.md (18502b), agents/draft_writer_agent.md (31221b), agents/formatter_agent.md (32571b), agents/intake_agent.md (10372b), agents/literature_strategist_agent.md (28720b), agents/peer_reviewer_agent.md (28971b), agents/revision_coach_agent.md (12643b), agents/socratic_mentor_agent.md (24915b), agents/structure_architect_agent.md (14877b), agents/visualization_agent.md (15862b), examples/chinese_paper_example.md (21572b), examples/imrad_hei_example.md (23879b), examples/literature_review_example.md (31541b), examples/plan_mode_guided_writing.md (35170b), examples/revision_mode_example.md (20318b), examples/revision_recovery_example.md (41036b), LICENSE (19584b), references/abstract_writing_guide.md (7981b), references/academic_writing_style.md (7741b), references/anti_leakage_protocol.md (4273b), references/apa7_chinese_citation_guide.md (12510b), references/apa7_extended_guide.md (6725b), references/changelog.md (2821b), references/citation_format_switcher.md (7548b), references/credit_authorship_guide.md (13983b), references/disclosure_mode_protocol.md (12764b), references/failure_paths.md (14163b), references/funding_statement_guide.md (12193b), references/hei_domain_glossary.md (6974b), references/journal_submission_guide.md (8891b), references/latex_template_reference.md (9851b), references/mode_selection_guide.md (12396b), references/paper_structure_patterns.md (8408b), references/plan_mode_protocol.md (4839b), references/policy_anchor_disclosure_protocol.md (20797b), references/policy_anchor_table.md (21692b), references/statistical_visualization_standards.md (24247b), references/venue_disclosure_policies.md (8778b), references/vlm_figure_verification.md (3312b), references/workflow_phase_details.md (3378b), references/writing_judgment_framework.md (3336b), references/writing_quality_check.md (9235b), shared/artifact_reproducibility_pattern.md (8921b), shared/benchmark_report_pattern.md (8988b), shared/benchmark_report.schema.json (2789b), shared/collaboration_depth_rubric.md (10810b), shared/compliance_checkpoint_protocol.md (7175b), shared/compliance_report.schema.json (8314b), shared/cross_model_verification.md (11173b), shared/ground_truth_isolation_pattern.md (12649b), shared/handoff_schemas.md (46013b), shared/mode_spectrum.md (4047b), shared/prisma_trAIce_protocol.md (10415b), shared/raise_framework.md (7365b), shared/sprint_contract.schema.json (18954b), shared/style_calibration_protocol.md (7085b), SKILL.md (5599b), templates/bilingual_abstract_template.md (2943b), templates/case_study_template.md (2895b), templates/conference_paper_template.md (2363b), templates/credit_statement_template.md (4476b), templates/funding_statement_template.md (9091b), templates/imrad_template.md (4544b), templates/literature_review_template.md (2896b), templates/policy_brief_template.md (3645b), templates/revision_tracking_template.md (5210b), templates/theoretical_paper_template.md (2913b), _meta.json (133b)\n\nArchive v3.1.1: 69 files, 335063 bytes\n\nFiles: agents/abstract_bilingual_agent.md (5751b), agents/argument_builder_agent.md (10529b), agents/citation_compliance_agent.md (18502b), agents/draft_writer_agent.md (31221b), agents/formatter_agent.md (32571b), agents/intake_agent.md (10372b), agents/literature_strategist_agent.md (28720b), agents/peer_reviewer_agent.md (28971b), agents/revision_coach_agent.md (12643b), agents/socratic_mentor_agent.md (24915b), agents/structure_architect_agent.md (14877b), agents/visualization_agent.md (15862b), examples/chinese_paper_example.md (21572b), examples/imrad_hei_example.md (23879b), examples/literature_review_example.md (31541b), examples/plan_mode_guided_writing.md (35170b), examples/revision_mode_example.md (20318b), examples/revision_recovery_example.md (41036b), references/abstract_writing_guide.md (7981b), references/academic_writing_style.md (7741b), references/anti_leakage_protocol.md (4273b), references/apa7_chinese_citation_guide.md (12510b), references/apa7_extended_guide.md (6725b), references/changelog.md (2821b), references/citation_format_switcher.md (7548b), references/credit_authorship_guide.md (13983b), references/disclosure_mode_protocol.md (12764b), references/failure_paths.md (14163b), references/funding_statement_guide.md (12193b), references/hei_domain_glossary.md (6974b), references/journal_submission_guide.md (8891b), references/latex_template_reference.md (9851b), references/mode_selection_guide.md (12396b), references/paper_structure_patterns.md (8408b), references/plan_mode_protocol.md (4839b), references/policy_anchor_disclosure_protocol.md (20797b), references/policy_anchor_table.md (21692b), references/statistical_visualization_standards.md (24247b), references/venue_disclosure_policies.md (8778b), references/vlm_figure_verification.md (3312b), references/workflow_phase_details.md (3378b), references/writing_judgment_framework.md (3336b), references/writing_quality_check.md (9235b), shared/artifact_reproducibility_pattern.md (8921b), shared/benchmark_report_pattern.md (8988b), shared/benchmark_report.schema.json (2789b), shared/collaboration_depth_rubric.md (10810b), shared/compliance_checkpoint_protocol.md (7175b), shared/compliance_report.schema.json (8314b), shared/cross_model_verification.md (11173b), shared/ground_truth_isolation_pattern.md (12649b), shared/handoff_schemas.md (46013b), shared/mode_spectrum.md (4047b), shared/prisma_trAIce_protocol.md (10415b), shared/raise_framework.md (7365b), shared/sprint_contract.schema.json (18954b), shared/style_calibration_protocol.md (7085b), SKILL.md (4967b), templates/bilingual_abstract_template.md (2943b), templates/case_study_template.md (2895b), templates/conference_paper_template.md (2363b), templates/credit_statement_template.md (4476b), templates/funding_statement_template.md (9091b), templates/imrad_template.md (4544b), templates/literature_review_template.md (2896b), templates/policy_brief_template.md (3645b), templates/revision_tracking_template.md (5210b), templates/theoretical_paper_template.md (2913b), _meta.json (133b)","readmeExcerpt":"Skill: Academic Paper Owner: andyrenxu7255 Summary: 12-agent academic paper writing pipeline on Hermes Agent. 10 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-che... Tags: academic:3.1.3, apa:3.1.3, bilingual:3.1.1, cc-by-nc:3.1.3, citation:3.1.3, hermes:3.1.3, latest:3.1.4, latex:3.1.3, multi-agent:3.1.3, paper-writing:3.1.3, research:3.1.1 Version history: v3.1.4 | 202","codeSnippets":[],"executableExamples":[{"language":"text","snippet":"Write a paper on the impact of AI on higher education quality assurance"},{"language":"text","snippet":"delegate_task(goal=\"Conduct paper configuration interview: paper type, discipline, journal, citation format, output format, language, word count.\", context=\"Use agents/intake_agent.md\")"},{"language":"text","snippet":"delegate_task(goal=\"Design search strategy, screen sources, produce annotated bibliography.\", context=\"Use agents/literature_strategist_agent.md\")"},{"language":"text","snippet":"delegate_task(goal=\"Select paper structure, create detailed outline with word count allocation and evidence mapping.\", context=\"Use agents/structure_architect_agent.md. Reference: references/paper_structure_patterns.md\")"},{"language":"text","snippet":"delegate_task(goal=\"Build argument blueprint: claim-evidence chains, logical flow, counter-argument handling.\", context=\"Use agents/argument_builder_agent.md\")"},{"language":"text","snippet":"delegate_task(goal=\"Write full paper draft section by section, maintaining discipline register and word count.\", context=\"Use agents/draft_writer_agent.md. Reference: references/writing_quality_check.md\")"}],"parameters":null,"dependencies":[],"permissions":[],"extractedFiles":[{"path":"SKILL.md","content":"---\nname: academic-paper\ndescription: \"12-agent academic paper writing pipeline on Hermes Agent. 10 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX/PDF output. Uses delegate_task for each agent. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見.\"\nmetadata:\n  version: \"3.1.1-hermes-1.0\"\n  last_updated: \"2026-05-16\"\n  status: active\n  adapted_from: \"imbad0202/academic-research-skills v3.1.1\"\n  adapted_for: \"Hermes Agent (deepseek-v4-pro)\"\n  task_type: open-ended\n  license: \"CC BY-NC 4.0\"\n  original_author: \"Cheng-I Wu\"\n  original_license: \"CC BY-NC 4.0\"\n  original_repo: \"https://github.com/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills\"\n  copyright: \"Copyright (c) 2026 Cheng-I Wu\"\n---\n# Academic Paper — 12-Agent Writing Pipeline (Hermes Edition)\n\n📄 **License:** [CC BY-NC 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) · Copyright (c) 2026 Cheng-I Wu  \n🔗 **Original:** [Imbad0202/academic-research-skills](https://github.com/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills) v3.1.1  \n🔄 **Adaptation:** Multi-agent pipeline implemented via `delegate_task` instead of Claude Code's internal agent system. All agent definitions, references, templates, and quality standards preserved unchanged from original. **This adaptation is distributed under the same CC BY-NC 4.0 license.**\n\n## Quick Start\n\n```\nWrite a paper on the impact of AI on higher education quality assurance\n```\n\n## Agent Team\n\n| # | Agent | Phase |\n|---|-------|-------|\n| 1 | intake_agent | Phase 0: Config interview |\n| 2 | literature_strategist_agent | Phase 1: Literature search |\n| 3 | structure_architect_agent | Phase 2: Structure/outline |\n| 4 | argument_builder_agent | Phase 3: Argument construction |\n| 5 | draft_writer_agent | Phase 4: Full draft |\n| 6 | citation_compliance_agent | Phase 5a: Citation check |\n| 7 | abstract_bilingual_agent | Phase 5b: Bilingual abstract |\n| 8 | peer_reviewer_agent | Phase 6: Peer review (max 2 loops) |\n| 9 | formatter_agent | Phase 7: Output formatting |\n| 10 | socratic_mentor_agent | Plan mode guide |\n| 11 | visualization_agent | Figures/charts |\n| 12 | revision_coach_agent | Reviewer comment parsing |\n\n## Hermes Execution Pattern\n\nAll phases use `delegate_task`. Agent files at `agents/` loaded as context.\n\n### Phase 0: Configuration\n```\ndelegate_task(goal=\"Conduct paper configuration interview: paper type, discipline, journal, citation format, output format, language, word count.\", context=\"Use agents/intake_agent.md\")\n```\n\n### Phase 1: Literature\n```\ndelegate_task(goal=\"Design search strategy, screen sources, produce annotated bibliography.\", context=\"Use agents/literature_strategist_agent.md\")\n```\n\n### Phase 2: Architecture\n```\ndelegate_task(goal=\"Select paper structure, create detailed outline with word count allocation and evidence mapping.\", context=\"Use agents/structure_architect_"},{"path":"_meta.json","content":"{\n  \"ownerId\": \"kn725tchg3gp72a78w22qa07p584f267\",\n  \"slug\": \"academic-paper\",\n  \"version\": \"3.1.4\",\n  \"publishedAt\": 1779058467396\n}"},{"path":"references/abstract_writing_guide.md","content":"# Abstract Writing Guide\n\nUsed by `abstract_bilingual_agent`.\n\n## Abstract Types\n\n### Structured Abstract\nContains explicit labeled sections. Required by many journals in social sciences and medicine.\n\n**Sections**: Background, Purpose/Objective, Method, Results/Findings, Conclusion/Implications\n\n### Unstructured Abstract\nA single flowing paragraph without labels. Common in humanities and some social sciences.\n\n**Flow**: Context → Problem → Purpose → Method → Key Findings → Implications\n\n### Extended Abstract\nLonger (500-1,000 words), used for conference submissions. May include brief literature review and preliminary results.\n\n## English Abstract Guidelines\n\n### Word Count\n- Standard: 150-250 words (check journal requirements)\n- Conference: 200-500 words (check CFP)\n- Dissertation: up to 350 words\n\n### Structure (5-Component Model)\n\n#### Component 1: Background (1-2 sentences)\nEstablish context and identify the problem.\n\n**Patterns**:\n- \"[Topic] has become increasingly important because...\"\n- \"Despite growing interest in [topic], little is known about...\"\n- \"Recent developments in [field] have raised questions about...\"\n\n**Avoid**:\n- Starting with \"This paper...\" (too abrupt)\n- Generic statements (\"Education is important\")\n- Overly long historical context\n\n#### Component 2: Purpose (1 sentence)\nState the specific objective or research question.\n\n**Patterns**:\n- \"This study examines [what] in [context].\"\n- \"The purpose of this research is to [verb] [object].\"\n- \"This paper proposes [framework/model] for [application].\"\n\n#### Component 3: Method (1-2 sentences)\nDescribe the approach, data, and analysis.\n\n**Patterns**:\n- \"Using [method], this study analyzed [data] from [source].\"\n- \"A [design] approach was employed, involving [participants/data].\"\n- \"Data were collected through [instrument] and analyzed using [technique].\"\n\n#### Component 4: Findings (2-3 sentences)\nPresent the key results — be specific.\n\n**Patterns**:\n- \"The results indicate that [finding 1]. Additionally, [finding 2].\"\n- \"Three key findings emerged: (a) [finding 1], (b) [finding 2], and (c) [finding 3].\"\n- \"The analysis revealed [main finding], with [specific metric/detail].\"\n\n**Include**:\n- Specific numbers when available (percentages, effect sizes)\n- The most important findings (not all findings)\n\n**Avoid**:\n- \"Results will be discussed\" (the abstract IS the discussion)\n- Vague findings (\"significant results were found\")\n\n#### Component 5: Implications (1-2 sentences)\nState the significance, practical implications, or recommendations.\n\n**Patterns**:\n- \"These findings have implications for [practice/policy/theory].\"\n- \"The results suggest that [stakeholders] should [action].\"\n- \"This research contributes to [field] by [contribution].\"\n\n### Example (English, Education)\n\n> Declining enrollment poses existential challenges for private higher education institutions in Taiwan, yet institutional responses remain poorly understood. This study examines the strategic adaptation patterns "},{"path":"references/academic_writing_style.md","content":"# Academic Writing Style Guide\n\nUsed by `draft_writer_agent` and `peer_reviewer_agent`.\n\n## Core Principles\n\n### 1. Precision\n- Use the most specific term available\n- Define technical terms on first use\n- Avoid ambiguous pronouns (\"this,\" \"it\") without clear antecedents\n\n### 2. Conciseness\n- Eliminate filler words and redundant phrases\n- One idea per sentence (or clearly connected ideas)\n- Prefer short sentences for complex ideas\n\n### 3. Objectivity\n- Base claims on evidence, not opinion\n- Use hedging for uncertain claims\n- Acknowledge limitations and alternative interpretations\n\n### 4. Formality\n- Use full forms (\"do not\" over \"don't\")\n- Use formal academic vocabulary; reserve colloquialisms and slang for informal writing\n- Use third person unless discipline conventions allow first person\n\n## Register Adjustment by Discipline\n\n### Sciences (Natural, Applied)\n```\nRegister: Formal, impersonal, method-focused\nVoice: Passive voice common (\"was measured,\" \"were analyzed\")\nTerminology: Precise measurements, SI units, statistical notation\nExample: \"The sample was heated to 350°C for 2 hours, yielding a conversion rate of 87.3% (SD = 2.1).\"\n```\n\n### Social Sciences\n```\nRegister: Formal, theory-informed, participant-aware\nVoice: Active voice encouraged, first person for researcher decisions\nTerminology: Theoretical constructs, operationalized variables\nExample: \"We employed semi-structured interviews to explore how participants understood institutional change (N = 24).\"\n```\n\n### Humanities\n```\nRegister: Formal, argument-driven, interpretive\nVoice: First person acceptable for arguments, active voice\nTerminology: Close reading vocabulary, theoretical language\nExample: \"I argue that the text's spatial metaphors reveal an underlying anxiety about institutional permanence.\"\n```\n\n### Engineering / CS\n```\nRegister: Formal, problem-solution oriented, specification-precise\nVoice: Passive common for methods, active for contributions\nTerminology: Technical specifications, performance metrics\nExample: \"The proposed algorithm achieves O(n log n) complexity, outperforming the baseline by 34% on the benchmark dataset.\"\n```\n\n### Education\n```\nRegister: Formal, practice-oriented, stakeholder-aware\nVoice: Active voice, first person for reflexive practice\nTerminology: Pedagogical concepts, assessment language\nExample: \"The intervention improved student metacognitive awareness, as evidenced by a significant increase in self-regulation scores (t(45) = 3.21, p = .002, d = 0.72).\"\n```\n\n### Medicine / Health\n```\nRegister: Formal, evidence-hierarchy conscious, clinical precision\nVoice: Passive for methods, active for findings\nTerminology: Clinical terms, diagnostic criteria, statistical reporting\nExample: \"Patients receiving the intervention showed a 40% reduction in readmission rates (RR = 0.60, 95% CI [0.45, 0.80], p = .001).\"\n```\n\n## Hedging and Strength Language\n\n### Hedging (for uncertain or qualified claims)\n| Strength | Hedging Devices | Example |\n|----------|------------"},{"path":"references/anti_leakage_protocol.md","content":"# Anti-Leakage Protocol (Knowledge Isolation)\n\n**Status**: v3.3\n**Used by**: `draft_writer_agent`, `report_compiler_agent`\n**Source**: Adapted from PaperOrchestra (Song et al., 2026, Appendix D.4)\n\n---\n\n## Purpose\n\nWhen the user provides comprehensive research materials (RQ Brief, Synthesis Report, Annotated Bibliography, experimental data), the writing agent should construct the paper **primarily from those materials**, not from LLM parametric memory. This prevents:\n\n1. **Methodology fabrication (Failure Mode 6)**: The LLM writes a plausible Methods section from training data rather than the user's actual procedure\n2. **Implicit knowledge leakage**: The LLM fills gaps with memorized content that may be inaccurate, outdated, or from a different context\n3. **Unintentional plagiarism**: The LLM reproduces near-verbatim passages from training data\n\n---\n\n## Protocol\n\n### When to activate\n\nActivate when ALL of the following are true:\n- The user has provided research materials via the pipeline handoff (RQ Brief + Synthesis Report + Annotated Bibliography)\n- The paper is in `full` or `revision` mode (not `plan` or `outline-only`)\n- The materials are substantive (not placeholder stubs)\n\n### When NOT to activate\n\nDo NOT activate when:\n- The user is in `plan` or `socratic` mode (exploratory — LLM knowledge is expected)\n- The materials are minimal (e.g., only a RQ Brief with no bibliography)\n- The user explicitly requests the LLM to supplement with its own knowledge\n\n### Prompt insertion\n\nWhen activated, prepend the following to the draft_writer_agent's working context:\n\n```\n## Knowledge Isolation Directive\n\nYou are writing this paper based on the research materials provided in this session:\n- RQ Brief, Synthesis Report, and Annotated Bibliography (from deep-research)\n- Any additional materials the user has provided (experimental logs, datasets, prior drafts)\n\nPriority rules:\n1. PREFER session materials over your parametric knowledge for all factual claims\n2. Every claim in the paper MUST be traceable to a source in the Annotated Bibliography or user-provided data\n3. If the materials do not cover a topic the outline requires, flag it as [MATERIAL GAP] rather than filling from memory\n4. Do NOT introduce references not present in the Annotated Bibliography unless explicitly asked by the user\n5. The Methods section must describe ONLY what is documented in the user's materials — do not infer or interpolate experimental procedures\n\nThis is NOT a prohibition on using language skills or academic writing knowledge.\nYou may use your knowledge of academic conventions, writing style, logical argumentation,\nand discipline norms. The restriction applies only to FACTUAL CONTENT — claims, citations,\ndata, and methodology descriptions must come from session materials.\n```\n\n### [MATERIAL GAP] handling\n\n> **Tag vocabulary.** The `[MATERIAL GAP]`, `[WEAK EVIDENCE]`, `[GAP]` tags used throughout this protocol are canonically defined in [`shared/compliance_checkpoint_protocol.m"}],"languages":[],"docsSourceLabel":"CLAWHUB","editorialOverview":"12-agent academic paper writing pipeline on Hermes Agent. 10 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-che... Skill: Academic Paper Owner: andyrenxu7255 Summary: 12-agent academic paper writing pipeline on Hermes Agent. 10 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-che... Tags: academic:3.1.3, apa:3.1.3, bilingual:3.1.1, cc-by-nc:3.1.3, citation:3.1.3, hermes:3.1.3, latest:3.1.4, latex:3.1.3, multi-agent:3.1.3, paper-writing:3.1.3, research:3.1.1 Version history: v3.1.4 | 202","editorialQuality":{"score":100,"threshold":65,"status":"ready","wordCount":1259,"uniquenessScore":56,"reasons":[]}},"media":{"evidence":{"source":"no-media","verified":false,"confidence":"low","updatedAt":"2026-10-09T15:09:50.835Z","emptyReason":"No screenshots, media assets, or demo links are available."},"primaryImageUrl":null,"mediaAssetCount":0,"assets":[],"demoUrl":null},"ownerResources":{"evidence":{"source":"unclaimed","verified":false,"confidence":"low","updatedAt":"2026-10-09T15:09:50.835Z","emptyReason":"This page has not been claimed by the agent owner."},"hasCustomPage":false,"customPageUpdatedAt":null,"customLinks":[],"structuredLinks":{"docsUrl":null,"demoUrl":null,"supportUrl":null,"pricingUrl":null,"statusUrl":null},"customPage":null},"relatedAgents":{"evidence":{"source":"protocol-neighbors","verified":false,"confidence":"medium","updatedAt":"2026-10-09T23:44:00.213Z","emptyReason":null},"items":[{"id":"8ebccd8e-3863-4187-8355-c3f14e1f9edf","entityType":"agent","canonicalPath":"/agent/iofficeai-aionui","slug":"iofficeai-aionui","name":"AionUi","description":"Free, local, open-source 24/7 Cowork app and OpenClaw for Gemini CLI, Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Qwen Code, Goose CLI, Auggie, and more | 🌟 Star if you like it!","url":"https://github.com/iOfficeAI/AionUi","homepage":"https://www.aionui.com","source":"GITHUB_REPOS","protocols":["MCP","OPENCLAW"],"capabilities":[],"safetyScore":100,"overallRank":70,"updatedAt":"2026-10-09T19:11:12.944Z","createdAt":"2026-02-25T03:38:16.584Z","downloads":null},{"id":"b917f68a-ebff-438e-84f8-3f4b2494c0bc","entityType":"agent","canonicalPath":"/agent/activepieces-activepieces","slug":"activepieces-activepieces","name":"activepieces","description":"AI Agents & MCPs & AI Workflow Automation • (~400 MCP servers for AI agents) • AI Automation / AI Agent with MCPs • AI Workflows & AI Agents • MCPs for AI Agents","url":"https://github.com/activepieces/activepieces","homepage":"https://www.activepieces.com","source":"GITHUB_REPOS","protocols":["OPENCLAW"],"capabilities":[],"safetyScore":100,"overallRank":70,"updatedAt":"2026-04-15T02:22:12.426Z","createdAt":"2026-02-25T03:38:12.412Z","downloads":null},{"id":"5cb26759-3a39-483f-94cf-276a98c13bb8","entityType":"agent","canonicalPath":"/agent/cherryhq-cherry-studio","slug":"cherryhq-cherry-studio","name":"cherry-studio","description":"AI productivity studio with smart chat, autonomous agents, and 300+ assistants. Unified access to frontier LLMs","url":"https://github.com/CherryHQ/cherry-studio","homepage":"https://cherry-ai.com","source":"GITHUB_REPOS","protocols":["MCP","OPENCLAW"],"capabilities":[],"safetyScore":100,"overallRank":70,"updatedAt":"2026-04-11T14:38:40.986Z","createdAt":"2026-02-25T03:38:19.379Z","downloads":null},{"id":"6f6582d0-5d76-4f0f-b81d-86520247950b","entityType":"agent","canonicalPath":"/agent/copilotkit-copilotkit","slug":"copilotkit-copilotkit","name":"CopilotKit","description":"The Frontend for Agents & Generative UI. React + Angular","url":"https://github.com/CopilotKit/CopilotKit","homepage":"https://docs.copilotkit.ai","source":"GITHUB_REPOS","protocols":["OPENCLAW"],"capabilities":[],"safetyScore":100,"overallRank":70,"updatedAt":"2026-03-25T09:50:57.846Z","createdAt":"2026-02-25T03:39:14.617Z","downloads":null}],"links":{"hub":"/agent","source":"/agent/source/clawhub","protocols":[{"label":"OpenClaw","href":"/agent/protocol/openclew"}]}}}