{"id":"4175fb16-2452-4502-befa-07c068f50ee6","slug":"clawhub-dgr-ai-labs-dgr","name":"Decision-Grade Reasoning (DGR)","description":"Audit-ready decision artifacts for LLM outputs - assumptions, risks, recommendation, and review gating (schema-valid JSON). Replaced with https://clawhub.ai/dgr-ai-labs/plugins/openclaw-dgr-gate)","canonicalUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/agent/clawhub-dgr-ai-labs-dgr","sourceUrl":"https://clawhub.ai/dgr-ai-labs/dgr","homepage":"https://clawhub.ai/dgr-ai-labs/skills/dgr","source":"CLAWHUB","vendor":{"slug":"clawhub","label":"Clawhub","url":"https://clawhub.ai/dgr-ai-labs/skills/dgr"},"protocols":["OPENCLEW"],"capabilities":[],"trustScore":null,"trustConfidence":"unknown","artifactCount":0,"benchmarkCount":0,"lastRelease":"1.1.1","freshnessAt":"2026-10-09T05:19:17.741Z","freshnessLabel":"Oct 9, 2026","securityReviewed":true,"openapiReady":false,"stats":[{"label":"Trust score","value":"Unknown"},{"label":"Compatibility","value":"OpenClaw"},{"label":"Freshness","value":"Oct 9, 2026"},{"label":"Vendor","value":"Clawhub"},{"label":"Artifacts","value":"0"},{"label":"Benchmarks","value":"0"},{"label":"Last release","value":"1.1.1"}],"factsPreview":[{"factKey":"vendor","category":"vendor","label":"Vendor","value":"Clawhub","href":"https://clawhub.ai/dgr-ai-labs/skills/dgr","sourceUrl":"https://clawhub.ai/dgr-ai-labs/skills/dgr","sourceType":"profile","confidence":"medium","observedAt":"2026-10-09T05:19:17.742Z","isPublic":true},{"factKey":"protocols","category":"compatibility","label":"Protocol compatibility","value":"OpenClaw","href":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-dgr-ai-labs-dgr/contract","sourceUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-dgr-ai-labs-dgr/contract","sourceType":"contract","confidence":"medium","observedAt":"2026-10-09T05:19:17.742Z","isPublic":true},{"factKey":"traction","category":"adoption","label":"Adoption signal","value":"4.5K downloads","href":"https://clawhub.ai/dgr-ai-labs/dgr","sourceUrl":"https://clawhub.ai/dgr-ai-labs/dgr","sourceType":"profile","confidence":"medium","observedAt":"2026-10-09T05:19:17.742Z","isPublic":true},{"factKey":"latest_release","category":"release","label":"Latest release","value":"1.1.1","href":"https://clawhub.ai/dgr-ai-labs/dgr","sourceUrl":"https://clawhub.ai/dgr-ai-labs/dgr","sourceType":"release","confidence":"medium","observedAt":"2026-09-24T19:04:55.087Z","isPublic":true},{"factKey":"handshake_status","category":"security","label":"Handshake status","value":"UNKNOWN","href":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-dgr-ai-labs-dgr/trust","sourceUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-dgr-ai-labs-dgr/trust","sourceType":"trust","confidence":"medium","observedAt":null,"isPublic":true}],"highlights":["4.5K downloads","Trust evidence available"],"agentCard":{"name":"Decision-Grade Reasoning (DGR)","description":"Audit-ready decision artifacts for LLM outputs - assumptions, risks, recommendation, and review gating (schema-valid JSON). Replaced with https://clawhub.ai/dgr-ai-labs/plugins/openclaw-dgr-gate)","source":"CLAWHUB","sourceId":"clawhub:s179065e52s0w3vtq1qbzc9feh8eynaw:dgr","homepage":"https://clawhub.ai/dgr-ai-labs/skills/dgr","repository":"https://clawhub.ai/dgr-ai-labs/dgr","documentation":"https://www.xpersona.co/agent/clawhub-dgr-ai-labs-dgr","protocols":["OPENCLEW"],"examples":[{"kind":"example","language":"json","snippet":"{\n  \"meta\": {\n    \"artifact_id\": \"00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000001\",\n    \"spec_version\": \"1.0.0\",\n    \"created_at\": \"2026-02-03T12:00:00Z\",\n    \"mode\": \"dgr_min\",\n    \"task_class\": \"access_control\"\n  },\n  \"input\": {\n    \"query_hash\": \"sha256:EXAMPLE\",\n    \"query_summary\": \"Evaluate a contractor request for temporary admin access to a production database for incident debugging.\"\n  },\n  \"clarifications\": [\n    {\n      \"question\": \"Which exact systems/tables are needed and what actions must be performed?\",\n      \"why_needed\": \"Least-privilege scope cannot be determined without precise access needs.\",\n      \"blocking\": true\n    }\n  ],\n  \"assumptions\": [\n    {\n      \"statement\": \"The contractor has a valid business need related to an active incident.\",\n      \"impact_if_wrong\": \"Unnecessary elevated access increases breach and compliance risk.\"\n    }\n  ],\n  \"risks\": [\n    {\n      \"risk\": \"Overbroad admin access could enable data exfiltration or destructive actions.\",\n      \"severity\": \"high\",\n      \"mitigation\": \"Use time-bound, scoped access; require MFA; enforce query logging and approval.\"\n    }\n  ],\n  \"recommendation\": {\n    \"action\": \"Conditionally approve only after scoping to least privilege; otherwise deny admin-level access.\",\n    \"rationale\": \"The request as stated is too broad for production; incident work can often be done with scoped read/write and audited break-glass procedures.\",\n    \"confidence\": 0.62,\n    \"review_required\": true,\n    \"next_steps\": [\n      \"Collect exact scope of access required (systems, actions, time window).\",\n      \"Implement time-bound role with MFA and audit logging.\",\n      \"Require incident manager approval and post-access review.\"\n    ]\n  },\n  \"consistency_check\": {\n    \"checks\": [\n      \"Assumptions and risks align with recommendation to scope access.\",\n      \"Clarification is marked blocking and recommendation sets review_required.\"\n    ],\n    \"passed\": true,\n    \"notes\": \"Decision deferred pending least-privilege scoping.\"\n"},{"kind":"example","language":"json","snippet":"{\n  \"meta\": {\n    \"artifact_id\": \"00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000002\",\n    \"spec_version\": \"1.0.0\",\n    \"created_at\": \"2026-02-03T12:00:00Z\",\n    \"mode\": \"dgr_full\",\n    \"task_class\": \"incident_response\"\n  },\n  \"input\": {\n    \"query_hash\": \"sha256:EXAMPLE\",\n    \"query_summary\": \"Decision on whether to rollback recent deployment vs. continue debugging production API errors affecting customer purchases.\"\n  },\n  \"clarifications\": [\n    {\n      \"question\": \"What is the error pattern - specific endpoints, user segments, or geographic regions?\",\n      \"why_needed\": \"Error scope affects rollback vs. targeted fix decision.\",\n      \"blocking\": false\n    }\n  ],\n  \"decomposition\": [\n    \"Assess current business impact and customer exposure\",\n    \"Evaluate rollback feasibility and time-to-recovery\",\n    \"Consider debugging complexity and available resources\",\n    \"Factor in deployment pipeline and testing coverage\"\n  ],\n  \"assumptions\": [\n    {\n      \"statement\": \"The deployment 2 hours ago introduced the errors (correlation observed).\",\n      \"impact_if_wrong\": \"Rollback may not resolve the issue and could delay actual root cause remediation.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"statement\": \"Rollback can be completed safely within 15-30 minutes.\",\n      \"impact_if_wrong\": \"Extended downtime or additional system instability during rollback process.\"\n    }\n  ],\n  \"risks\": [\n    {\n      \"risk\": \"Continued debugging delays customer purchase recovery and increases revenue loss.\",\n      \"severity\": \"high\",\n      \"mitigation\": \"Set explicit debug time limit (30 min max) before mandatory rollback decision.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"risk\": \"Hasty rollback could introduce different issues or data inconsistencies.\",\n      \"severity\": \"medium\",\n      \"mitigation\": \"Verify rollback safety with database state checks and staged deployment approach.\"\n    }\n  ],\n  \"recommendation\": {\n    \"action\": \"Execute rollback immediately while maintaining parallel debug effort.\",\n    \"rationale\": \"15% error rate on purchas"}]}}