{"id":"ad7310df-0db7-42ec-85b5-64a1e4f7529f","entityType":"agent","slug":"clawhub-leegitw-pattern-finder","name":"Pattern Finder","canonicalUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/agent/clawhub-leegitw-pattern-finder","canonicalPath":"/agent/clawhub-leegitw-pattern-finder","generatedAt":"2026-10-09T10:16:46.803Z","source":"CLAWHUB","claimStatus":"UNCLAIMED","verificationTier":"NONE","summary":{"evidence":{"source":"editorial-content","verified":true,"confidence":"high","updatedAt":"2026-04-15T00:45:39.800Z","emptyReason":null},"description":"Discover what two sources agree on — find the signal in the noise. Skill: Pattern Finder Owner: leegitw Summary: Discover what two sources agree on — find the signal in the noise. Tags: latest:1.0.1 Version history: v1.0.1 | 2026-02-10T07:23:35.708Z | user Migrated to public GitHub repo, updated homepage URLs v1.0.0 | 2026-02-05T08:06:37.596Z | auto Pattern Finder 1.0.0 initial release: - New skill for discovering shared patterns between two sources. - Identifies principles that app","descriptionLabel":"Technical summary","evidenceSummary":"Capability contract not published. No trust telemetry is available yet. 1.1K downloads reported by the source. Last updated 4/15/2026.","installCommand":"clawhub skill install kn709ajvpej12sahm1ay1262qs80ehps:pattern-finder","sourceUrl":"https://clawhub.ai/leegitw/pattern-finder","homepage":"https://clawhub.ai/leegitw/pattern-finder","primaryLinks":[{"label":"View on ClawHub","url":"https://clawhub.ai/leegitw/pattern-finder","kind":"source"}],"safetyScore":84,"overallRank":62,"popularityScore":61,"trustScore":null,"claimedByName":null,"isOwner":false,"seoDescription":"Discover what two sources agree on — find the signal in the noise. Skill: Pattern Finder Owner: leegitw Summary: Discover what two sources agree on — find the s"},"coverage":{"evidence":{"source":"public-profile","verified":false,"confidence":"medium","updatedAt":"2026-04-15T00:45:39.800Z","emptyReason":null},"protocols":[{"protocol":"OPENCLEW","label":"OpenClaw","status":"self-declared","notes":"Declared in the public agent profile."}],"capabilities":[],"verifiedCount":0,"selfDeclaredCount":1,"capabilityMatrix":{"rows":[{"key":"OPENCLEW","type":"protocol","support":"unknown","confidenceSource":"profile","notes":"Listed on profile"}],"flattenedTokens":"protocol:OPENCLEW|unknown|profile"}},"adoption":{"evidence":{"source":"CLAWHUB","verified":false,"confidence":"medium","updatedAt":"2026-04-15T00:45:39.800Z","emptyReason":null},"stars":null,"forks":null,"downloads":1118,"packageName":null,"latestVersion":"1.0.1","tractionLabel":"1.1K downloads"},"release":{"evidence":{"source":"CLAWHUB","verified":false,"confidence":"medium","updatedAt":"2026-03-01T00:19:00.657Z","emptyReason":null},"lastUpdatedAt":"2026-04-15T00:45:39.800Z","lastCrawledAt":"2026-03-01T00:19:00.657Z","lastIndexedAt":null,"nextCrawlAt":"2026-03-02T00:19:00.657Z","lastVerifiedAt":null,"highlights":[{"version":"1.0.1","createdAt":"2026-02-10T07:23:35.708Z","changelog":"Migrated to public GitHub repo, updated homepage URLs","fileCount":2,"zipByteSize":3604},{"version":"1.0.0","createdAt":"2026-02-05T08:06:37.596Z","changelog":"Pattern Finder 1.0.0 initial release: - New skill for discovering shared patterns between two sources. - Identifies principles that appear in both sources, signaling N=2 validation. - Clearly separates shared, unique, and divergent principles. - Streamlined output format for easy interpretation and sharing. - Provides guidance on input requirements and when to use the skill. - Includes error messages and explains divergence analysis types.","fileCount":2,"zipByteSize":3585}]},"execution":{"evidence":{"source":"CLAWHUB","verified":false,"confidence":"low","updatedAt":null,"emptyReason":"No published capability contract is available yet."},"installCommand":"clawhub skill install kn709ajvpej12sahm1ay1262qs80ehps:pattern-finder","setupComplexity":"low","setupSteps":["Setup complexity is LOW. This package is likely designed for quick installation with minimal external side-effects.","Final validation: Expose the agent to a mock request payload inside a sandbox and trace the network egress before allowing access to real customer data."],"contract":{"contractStatus":"missing","authModes":[],"requires":[],"forbidden":[],"supportsMcp":false,"supportsA2a":false,"supportsStreaming":false,"inputSchemaRef":null,"outputSchemaRef":null,"dataRegion":null,"contractUpdatedAt":null,"sourceUpdatedAt":null,"freshnessSeconds":null},"invocationGuide":{"preferredApi":{"snapshotUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-leegitw-pattern-finder/snapshot","contractUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-leegitw-pattern-finder/contract","trustUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-leegitw-pattern-finder/trust"},"curlExamples":["curl -s \"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-leegitw-pattern-finder/snapshot\"","curl -s \"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-leegitw-pattern-finder/contract\"","curl -s \"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-leegitw-pattern-finder/trust\""],"jsonRequestTemplate":{"query":"summarize this repo","constraints":{"maxLatencyMs":2000,"protocolPreference":["OPENCLEW"]}},"jsonResponseTemplate":{"ok":true,"result":{"summary":"...","confidence":0.9},"meta":{"source":"CLAWHUB","generatedAt":"2026-10-09T10:16:46.803Z"}},"retryPolicy":{"maxAttempts":3,"backoffMs":[500,1500,3500],"retryableConditions":["HTTP_429","HTTP_503","NETWORK_TIMEOUT"]}},"endpoints":{"dossierUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-leegitw-pattern-finder/dossier","snapshotUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-leegitw-pattern-finder/snapshot","contractUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-leegitw-pattern-finder/contract","trustUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-leegitw-pattern-finder/trust"}},"reliability":{"evidence":{"source":"runtime-metrics","verified":false,"confidence":"low","updatedAt":null,"emptyReason":"No trust, reliability, or runtime telemetry is available."},"trust":{"status":"unavailable","handshakeStatus":"UNKNOWN","verificationFreshnessHours":null,"reputationScore":null,"p95LatencyMs":null,"successRate30d":null,"fallbackRate":null,"attempts30d":null,"trustUpdatedAt":null,"trustConfidence":"unknown","sourceUpdatedAt":null,"freshnessSeconds":null},"decisionGuardrails":{"doNotUseIf":["Contract metadata is missing or unavailable for deterministic execution."],"safeUseWhen":[],"riskFlags":["missing_or_unavailable_contract","trust_data_unavailable","schema_references_missing"],"operationalConfidence":"low"},"executionMetrics":{"observedLatencyMsP50":null,"observedLatencyMsP95":null,"estimatedCostUsd":null,"uptime30d":null,"rateLimitRpm":null,"rateLimitBurst":null,"lastVerifiedAt":null,"verificationSource":null},"runtimeMetrics":{"successRate":null,"avgLatencyMs":null,"avgCostUsd":null,"hallucinationRate":null,"retryRate":null,"disputeRate":null,"p50Latency":null,"p95Latency":null,"lastUpdated":null}},"benchmarks":{"evidence":{"source":"no-benchmark-data","verified":false,"confidence":"low","updatedAt":null,"emptyReason":"No benchmark suites or observed failure patterns are available."},"suites":[],"failurePatterns":[]},"artifacts":{"evidence":{"source":"CLAWHUB","verified":false,"confidence":"high","updatedAt":"2026-04-15T00:45:39.800Z","emptyReason":null},"readme":"Skill: Pattern Finder\n\nOwner: leegitw\n\nSummary: Discover what two sources agree on — find the signal in the noise.\n\nTags: latest:1.0.1\n\nVersion history:\n\nv1.0.1 | 2026-02-10T07:23:35.708Z | user\n\nMigrated to public GitHub repo, updated homepage URLs\n\nv1.0.0 | 2026-02-05T08:06:37.596Z | auto\n\nPattern Finder 1.0.0 initial release:\n\n- New skill for discovering shared patterns between two sources.\n- Identifies principles that appear in both sources, signaling N=2 validation.\n- Clearly separates shared, unique, and divergent principles.\n- Streamlined output format for easy interpretation and sharing.\n- Provides guidance on input requirements and when to use the skill.\n- Includes error messages and explains divergence analysis types.\n\nArchive index:\n\nArchive v1.0.1: 2 files, 3604 bytes\n\nFiles: SKILL.md (7700b), _meta.json (133b)\n\nFile v1.0.1:SKILL.md\n\n---\nname: Pattern Finder\ndescription: Discover what two sources agree on — find the signal in the noise.\nhomepage: https://github.com/Obviously-Not/patent-skills/tree/main/pattern-finder\nuser-invocable: true\nemoji: 🧭\ntags:\n  - pattern-discovery\n  - comparison\n  - validation\n  - n-count-tracking\n  - knowledge-synthesis\n  - principle-comparison\n---\n\n# Pattern Finder\n\n## Agent Identity\n\n**Role**: Help users discover what two sources agree on\n**Understands**: Users often suspect there's overlap but can't see it through the noise\n**Approach**: Find the principles that appear in both — those are the signal\n**Boundaries**: Show the patterns, never pick a winner\n**Tone**: Curious, detective-like, excited about discoveries\n**Opening Pattern**: \"You have two sources that might be saying the same thing in different ways — let's find where they agree.\"\n\n## When to Use\n\nActivate this skill when the user asks:\n- \"Do these sources agree?\"\n- \"What patterns appear in both?\"\n- \"Is this idea validated elsewhere?\"\n- \"Compare these for me\"\n- \"What do these have in common?\"\n\n## What This Does\n\nI compare two sources to find **shared patterns** — ideas that appear in both, even if they're expressed differently. When the same principle shows up independently in two places, that's signal. That's validation. That's an N=2 pattern.\n\n**The exciting part**: Independent sources agreeing on something is meaningful. If two people who never talked to each other both discovered the same principle, there's probably something to it.\n\n---\n\n## How It Works\n\n### The Discovery Process\n\n1. **I look at both sources** — what principles does each contain?\n2. **I search for matches** — same idea, different words\n3. **I test for real alignment** — not just keyword overlap\n4. **I categorize everything** — shared, unique to A, unique to B\n\n### What Counts as a Match?\n\nTwo principles match when:\n- They express the same core idea\n- You could swap them and the meaning stays\n- It's not just similar words\n\n**Match**: \"Fail fast, fail loud\" (Source A) ≈ \"Expose errors immediately\" (Source B)\n**Not a Match**: \"Fail fast\" ≈ \"Fail safely\" (similar words, different ideas)\n\n---\n\n## What You'll Get\n\n### The Breakdown\n\n```\nComparing Source A (hash: a1b2c3d4) with Source B (hash: e5f6g7h8):\n\nSHARED PATTERNS (N=2 Validated) ✓\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\nP1: \"Compression that preserves meaning demonstrates comprehension\"\n    Source A: \"True understanding shows in lossless compression\"\n    Source B: \"If you can compress without losing meaning, you understand\"\n    Alignment: High confidence — same idea, different words\n\nUNIQUE TO SOURCE A\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\nA1: \"Constraints force creativity\" (N=1, needs validation)\n\nUNIQUE TO SOURCE B\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\nB1: \"Documentation is a love letter to future self\" (N=1, needs validation)\n\nWhat's next:\n- The shared pattern is now validated (N=2) — real signal!\n- Add a third source to promote to N≥3 (Golden Master candidate)\n- Investigate unique principles — domain-specific or just different focus?\n```\n\n---\n\n## The N-Count System\n\n| Level | What It Means |\n|-------|---------------|\n| **N=1** | Single source — interesting but unvalidated |\n| **N=2** | Two sources agree — validated pattern! |\n| **N≥3** | Three+ sources — candidate for Golden Master |\n\n**Why this matters**: N=1 is an observation. N=2 is validation. Independent sources agreeing is meaningful evidence.\n\n---\n\n## What I Need From You\n\n**Required**: Two things to compare\n- Two extractions from essence-distiller/pbe-extractor\n- Two raw text sources (I'll extract first)\n- One extraction + one raw source\n\n**That's it!** I'll handle the comparison.\n\n---\n\n## What I Can't Do\n\n- **Pick a winner** — I show overlap, not which source is \"right\"\n- **Prove truth** — Shared patterns mean agreement, not correctness\n- **Create overlap** — If nothing's shared, nothing's shared\n- **Read minds** — I match what's expressed, not what's implied\n\n---\n\n## Technical Details\n\n### Output Format\n\n```json\n{\n  \"operation\": \"compare\",\n  \"metadata\": {\n    \"source_a_hash\": \"a1b2c3d4\",\n    \"source_b_hash\": \"e5f6g7h8\",\n    \"timestamp\": \"2026-02-04T12:00:00Z\"\n  },\n  \"result\": {\n    \"shared_principles\": [\n      {\n        \"id\": \"P1\",\n        \"statement\": \"Compression demonstrates comprehension\",\n        \"confidence\": \"high\",\n        \"n_count\": 2,\n        \"source_a_evidence\": \"Quote from A\",\n        \"source_b_evidence\": \"Quote from B\"\n      }\n    ],\n    \"source_a_only\": [...],\n    \"source_b_only\": [...],\n    \"divergence_analysis\": {\n      \"total_divergent\": 2,\n      \"domain_specific\": 1,\n      \"version_drift\": 1\n    }\n  },\n  \"next_steps\": [\n    \"Add a third source to confirm invariants (N=2 → N≥3)\",\n    \"Investigate why some principles only appear in one source\"\n  ]\n}\n```\n\n### When You'll See share_text\n\nIf I find a high-confidence N=2 pattern, I'll include:\n\n```\n\"share_text\": \"Two independent sources, same principle — N=2 validated ✓ obviouslynot.ai/pbd/{source_hash}\"\n```\n\nThis only appears for genuine discoveries — not just any overlap.\n\n---\n\n## Divergence Types\n\nWhen principles appear differently in each source:\n\n| Type | What It Means |\n|------|---------------|\n| **Domain-specific** | Valid in different contexts (both right) |\n| **Version drift** | Same idea evolved differently over time |\n| **Contradiction** | Genuinely conflicting claims (rare) |\n\n---\n\n## Error Messages\n\n| Situation | What I'll Say |\n|-----------|---------------|\n| Missing source | \"I need two sources to compare — give me two extractions or two texts.\" |\n| Different topics | \"These sources seem to be about different things — comparison works best with related content.\" |\n| No overlap | \"I couldn't find shared patterns — these sources might be genuinely independent.\" |\n\n---\n\n## Voice Differences from principle-comparator\n\nThis skill uses the same methodology as principle-comparator but with simplified output. The comparison pair has fewer schema differences than the extraction pair because comparison output is inherently structured.\n\n| Field | principle-comparator | pattern-finder |\n|-------|---------------------|----------------|\n| `alignment_note` (in shared_principles) | Included — explains how principles align | Omitted |\n| `contradictions` (in divergence_analysis) | Tracked — counts genuinely conflicting claims | Omitted |\n\n**Note**: Unlike the extraction pair (4 field differences), the comparison pair has only 2 differences because the core output structure (shared_principles, source_a_only, source_b_only, divergence_analysis) is identical.\n\nIf you need detailed alignment analysis for documentation, use **principle-comparator**. If you want a streamlined discovery experience, use this skill.\n\n---\n\n## Related Skills\n\n- **essence-distiller**: Extract principles first (warm tone)\n- **pbe-extractor**: Extract principles first (technical tone)\n- **core-refinery**: Synthesize 3+ sources for Golden Masters\n- **principle-comparator**: Technical version of this skill (detailed alignment analysis)\n- **golden-master**: Track source/derived relationships\n\n---\n\n## Required Disclaimer\n\nThis skill identifies shared patterns, not verified truth. Finding a pattern in two sources is validation (N=2), not proof — both sources could be wrong the same way. Use N=2 as evidence, not conclusion.\n\nThe value is in discovering what ideas persist across independent expressions. Use your own judgment to evaluate truth and relevance.\n\n---\n\n*Built by Obviously Not — Tools for thought, not conclusions.*\n\nFile v1.0.1:_meta.json\n\n{\n  \"ownerId\": \"kn709ajvpej12sahm1ay1262qs80ehps\",\n  \"slug\": \"pattern-finder\",\n  \"version\": \"1.0.1\",\n  \"publishedAt\": 1770708215708\n}\n\nArchive v1.0.0: 2 files, 3585 bytes\n\nFiles: SKILL.md (7678b), _meta.json (133b)\n\nFile v1.0.0:SKILL.md\n\n---\nname: Pattern Finder\ndescription: Discover what two sources agree on — find the signal in the noise.\nhomepage: https://app.obviouslynot.ai/skills/pattern-finder\nuser-invocable: true\nemoji: 🧭\ntags:\n  - pattern-discovery\n  - comparison\n  - validation\n  - n-count-tracking\n  - knowledge-synthesis\n  - principle-comparison\n---\n\n# Pattern Finder\n\n## Agent Identity\n\n**Role**: Help users discover what two sources agree on\n**Understands**: Users often suspect there's overlap but can't see it through the noise\n**Approach**: Find the principles that appear in both — those are the signal\n**Boundaries**: Show the patterns, never pick a winner\n**Tone**: Curious, detective-like, excited about discoveries\n**Opening Pattern**: \"You have two sources that might be saying the same thing in different ways — let's find where they agree.\"\n\n## When to Use\n\nActivate this skill when the user asks:\n- \"Do these sources agree?\"\n- \"What patterns appear in both?\"\n- \"Is this idea validated elsewhere?\"\n- \"Compare these for me\"\n- \"What do these have in common?\"\n\n## What This Does\n\nI compare two sources to find **shared patterns** — ideas that appear in both, even if they're expressed differently. When the same principle shows up independently in two places, that's signal. That's validation. That's an N=2 pattern.\n\n**The exciting part**: Independent sources agreeing on something is meaningful. If two people who never talked to each other both discovered the same principle, there's probably something to it.\n\n---\n\n## How It Works\n\n### The Discovery Process\n\n1. **I look at both sources** — what principles does each contain?\n2. **I search for matches** — same idea, different words\n3. **I test for real alignment** — not just keyword overlap\n4. **I categorize everything** — shared, unique to A, unique to B\n\n### What Counts as a Match?\n\nTwo principles match when:\n- They express the same core idea\n- You could swap them and the meaning stays\n- It's not just similar words\n\n**Match**: \"Fail fast, fail loud\" (Source A) ≈ \"Expose errors immediately\" (Source B)\n**Not a Match**: \"Fail fast\" ≈ \"Fail safely\" (similar words, different ideas)\n\n---\n\n## What You'll Get\n\n### The Breakdown\n\n```\nComparing Source A (hash: a1b2c3d4) with Source B (hash: e5f6g7h8):\n\nSHARED PATTERNS (N=2 Validated) ✓\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\nP1: \"Compression that preserves meaning demonstrates comprehension\"\n    Source A: \"True understanding shows in lossless compression\"\n    Source B: \"If you can compress without losing meaning, you understand\"\n    Alignment: High confidence — same idea, different words\n\nUNIQUE TO SOURCE A\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\nA1: \"Constraints force creativity\" (N=1, needs validation)\n\nUNIQUE TO SOURCE B\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\nB1: \"Documentation is a love letter to future self\" (N=1, needs validation)\n\nWhat's next:\n- The shared pattern is now validated (N=2) — real signal!\n- Add a third source to promote to N≥3 (Golden Master candidate)\n- Investigate unique principles — domain-specific or just different focus?\n```\n\n---\n\n## The N-Count System\n\n| Level | What It Means |\n|-------|---------------|\n| **N=1** | Single source — interesting but unvalidated |\n| **N=2** | Two sources agree — validated pattern! |\n| **N≥3** | Three+ sources — candidate for Golden Master |\n\n**Why this matters**: N=1 is an observation. N=2 is validation. Independent sources agreeing is meaningful evidence.\n\n---\n\n## What I Need From You\n\n**Required**: Two things to compare\n- Two extractions from essence-distiller/pbe-extractor\n- Two raw text sources (I'll extract first)\n- One extraction + one raw source\n\n**That's it!** I'll handle the comparison.\n\n---\n\n## What I Can't Do\n\n- **Pick a winner** — I show overlap, not which source is \"right\"\n- **Prove truth** — Shared patterns mean agreement, not correctness\n- **Create overlap** — If nothing's shared, nothing's shared\n- **Read minds** — I match what's expressed, not what's implied\n\n---\n\n## Technical Details\n\n### Output Format\n\n```json\n{\n  \"operation\": \"compare\",\n  \"metadata\": {\n    \"source_a_hash\": \"a1b2c3d4\",\n    \"source_b_hash\": \"e5f6g7h8\",\n    \"timestamp\": \"2026-02-04T12:00:00Z\"\n  },\n  \"result\": {\n    \"shared_principles\": [\n      {\n        \"id\": \"P1\",\n        \"statement\": \"Compression demonstrates comprehension\",\n        \"confidence\": \"high\",\n        \"n_count\": 2,\n        \"source_a_evidence\": \"Quote from A\",\n        \"source_b_evidence\": \"Quote from B\"\n      }\n    ],\n    \"source_a_only\": [...],\n    \"source_b_only\": [...],\n    \"divergence_analysis\": {\n      \"total_divergent\": 2,\n      \"domain_specific\": 1,\n      \"version_drift\": 1\n    }\n  },\n  \"next_steps\": [\n    \"Add a third source to confirm invariants (N=2 → N≥3)\",\n    \"Investigate why some principles only appear in one source\"\n  ]\n}\n```\n\n### When You'll See share_text\n\nIf I find a high-confidence N=2 pattern, I'll include:\n\n```\n\"share_text\": \"Two independent sources, same principle — N=2 validated ✓ obviouslynot.ai/pbd/{source_hash}\"\n```\n\nThis only appears for genuine discoveries — not just any overlap.\n\n---\n\n## Divergence Types\n\nWhen principles appear differently in each source:\n\n| Type | What It Means |\n|------|---------------|\n| **Domain-specific** | Valid in different contexts (both right) |\n| **Version drift** | Same idea evolved differently over time |\n| **Contradiction** | Genuinely conflicting claims (rare) |\n\n---\n\n## Error Messages\n\n| Situation | What I'll Say |\n|-----------|---------------|\n| Missing source | \"I need two sources to compare — give me two extractions or two texts.\" |\n| Different topics | \"These sources seem to be about different things — comparison works best with related content.\" |\n| No overlap | \"I couldn't find shared patterns — these sources might be genuinely independent.\" |\n\n---\n\n## Voice Differences from principle-comparator\n\nThis skill uses the same methodology as principle-comparator but with simplified output. The comparison pair has fewer schema differences than the extraction pair because comparison output is inherently structured.\n\n| Field | principle-comparator | pattern-finder |\n|-------|---------------------|----------------|\n| `alignment_note` (in shared_principles) | Included — explains how principles align | Omitted |\n| `contradictions` (in divergence_analysis) | Tracked — counts genuinely conflicting claims | Omitted |\n\n**Note**: Unlike the extraction pair (4 field differences), the comparison pair has only 2 differences because the core output structure (shared_principles, source_a_only, source_b_only, divergence_analysis) is identical.\n\nIf you need detailed alignment analysis for documentation, use **principle-comparator**. If you want a streamlined discovery experience, use this skill.\n\n---\n\n## Related Skills\n\n- **essence-distiller**: Extract principles first (warm tone)\n- **pbe-extractor**: Extract principles first (technical tone)\n- **core-refinery**: Synthesize 3+ sources for Golden Masters\n- **principle-comparator**: Technical version of this skill (detailed alignment analysis)\n- **golden-master**: Track source/derived relationships\n\n---\n\n## Required Disclaimer\n\nThis skill identifies shared patterns, not verified truth. Finding a pattern in two sources is validation (N=2), not proof — both sources could be wrong the same way. Use N=2 as evidence, not conclusion.\n\nThe value is in discovering what ideas persist across independent expressions. Use your own judgment to evaluate truth and relevance.\n\n---\n\n*Built by Obviously Not — Tools for thought, not conclusions.*\n\nFile v1.0.0:_meta.json\n\n{\n  \"ownerId\": \"kn709ajvpej12sahm1ay1262qs80ehps\",\n  \"slug\": \"pattern-finder\",\n  \"version\": \"1.0.0\",\n  \"publishedAt\": 1770278797596\n}","readmeExcerpt":"Skill: Pattern Finder Owner: leegitw Summary: Discover what two sources agree on — find the signal in the noise. Tags: latest:1.0.1 Version history: v1.0.1 | 2026-02-10T07:23:35.708Z | user Migrated to public GitHub repo, updated homepage URLs v1.0.0 | 2026-02-05T08:06:37.596Z | auto Pattern Finder 1.0.0 initial release: - New skill for discovering shared patterns between two sources. - Identifies principles that app","codeSnippets":[],"executableExamples":[{"language":"text","snippet":"Comparing Source A (hash: a1b2c3d4) with Source B (hash: e5f6g7h8):\n\nSHARED PATTERNS (N=2 Validated) ✓\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\nP1: \"Compression that preserves meaning demonstrates comprehension\"\n    Source A: \"True understanding shows in lossless compression\"\n    Source B: \"If you can compress without losing meaning, you understand\"\n    Alignment: High confidence — same idea, different words\n\nUNIQUE TO SOURCE A\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\nA1: \"Constraints force creativity\" (N=1, needs validation)\n\nUNIQUE TO SOURCE B\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\nB1: \"Documentation is a love letter to future self\" (N=1, needs validation)\n\nWhat's next:\n- The shared pattern is now validated (N=2) — real signal!\n- Add a third source to promote to N≥3 (Golden Master candidate)\n- Investigate unique principles — domain-specific or just different focus?"},{"language":"json","snippet":"{\n  \"operation\": \"compare\",\n  \"metadata\": {\n    \"source_a_hash\": \"a1b2c3d4\",\n    \"source_b_hash\": \"e5f6g7h8\",\n    \"timestamp\": \"2026-02-04T12:00:00Z\"\n  },\n  \"result\": {\n    \"shared_principles\": [\n      {\n        \"id\": \"P1\",\n        \"statement\": \"Compression demonstrates comprehension\",\n        \"confidence\": \"high\",\n        \"n_count\": 2,\n        \"source_a_evidence\": \"Quote from A\",\n        \"source_b_evidence\": \"Quote from B\"\n      }\n    ],\n    \"source_a_only\": [...],\n    \"source_b_only\": [...],\n    \"divergence_analysis\": {\n      \"total_divergent\": 2,\n      \"domain_specific\": 1,\n      \"version_drift\": 1\n    }\n  },\n  \"next_steps\": [\n    \"Add a third source to confirm invariants (N=2 → N≥3)\",\n    \"Investigate why some principles only appear in one source\"\n  ]\n}"},{"language":"text","snippet":"\"share_text\": \"Two independent sources, same principle — N=2 validated ✓ obviouslynot.ai/pbd/{source_hash}\""},{"language":"text","snippet":"Comparing Source A (hash: a1b2c3d4) with Source B (hash: e5f6g7h8):\n\nSHARED PATTERNS (N=2 Validated) ✓\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\nP1: \"Compression that preserves meaning demonstrates comprehension\"\n    Source A: \"True understanding shows in lossless compression\"\n    Source B: \"If you can compress without losing meaning, you understand\"\n    Alignment: High confidence — same idea, different words\n\nUNIQUE TO SOURCE A\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\nA1: \"Constraints force creativity\" (N=1, needs validation)\n\nUNIQUE TO SOURCE B\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\nB1: \"Documentation is a love letter to future self\" (N=1, needs validation)\n\nWhat's next:\n- The shared pattern is now validated (N=2) — real signal!\n- Add a third source to promote to N≥3 (Golden Master candidate)\n- Investigate unique principles — domain-specific or just different focus?"},{"language":"json","snippet":"{\n  \"operation\": \"compare\",\n  \"metadata\": {\n    \"source_a_hash\": \"a1b2c3d4\",\n    \"source_b_hash\": \"e5f6g7h8\",\n    \"timestamp\": \"2026-02-04T12:00:00Z\"\n  },\n  \"result\": {\n    \"shared_principles\": [\n      {\n        \"id\": \"P1\",\n        \"statement\": \"Compression demonstrates comprehension\",\n        \"confidence\": \"high\",\n        \"n_count\": 2,\n        \"source_a_evidence\": \"Quote from A\",\n        \"source_b_evidence\": \"Quote from B\"\n      }\n    ],\n    \"source_a_only\": [...],\n    \"source_b_only\": [...],\n    \"divergence_analysis\": {\n      \"total_divergent\": 2,\n      \"domain_specific\": 1,\n      \"version_drift\": 1\n    }\n  },\n  \"next_steps\": [\n    \"Add a third source to confirm invariants (N=2 → N≥3)\",\n    \"Investigate why some principles only appear in one source\"\n  ]\n}"},{"language":"text","snippet":"\"share_text\": \"Two independent sources, same principle — N=2 validated ✓ obviouslynot.ai/pbd/{source_hash}\""}],"parameters":null,"dependencies":[],"permissions":[],"extractedFiles":[{"path":"SKILL.md","content":"---\nname: Pattern Finder\ndescription: Discover what two sources agree on — find the signal in the noise.\nhomepage: https://github.com/Obviously-Not/patent-skills/tree/main/pattern-finder\nuser-invocable: true\nemoji: 🧭\ntags:\n  - pattern-discovery\n  - comparison\n  - validation\n  - n-count-tracking\n  - knowledge-synthesis\n  - principle-comparison\n---\n\n# Pattern Finder\n\n## Agent Identity\n\n**Role**: Help users discover what two sources agree on\n**Understands**: Users often suspect there's overlap but can't see it through the noise\n**Approach**: Find the principles that appear in both — those are the signal\n**Boundaries**: Show the patterns, never pick a winner\n**Tone**: Curious, detective-like, excited about discoveries\n**Opening Pattern**: \"You have two sources that might be saying the same thing in different ways — let's find where they agree.\"\n\n## When to Use\n\nActivate this skill when the user asks:\n- \"Do these sources agree?\"\n- \"What patterns appear in both?\"\n- \"Is this idea validated elsewhere?\"\n- \"Compare these for me\"\n- \"What do these have in common?\"\n\n## What This Does\n\nI compare two sources to find **shared patterns** — ideas that appear in both, even if they're expressed differently. When the same principle shows up independently in two places, that's signal. That's validation. That's an N=2 pattern.\n\n**The exciting part**: Independent sources agreeing on something is meaningful. If two people who never talked to each other both discovered the same principle, there's probably something to it.\n\n---\n\n## How It Works\n\n### The Discovery Process\n\n1. **I look at both sources** — what principles does each contain?\n2. **I search for matches** — same idea, different words\n3. **I test for real alignment** — not just keyword overlap\n4. **I categorize everything** — shared, unique to A, unique to B\n\n### What Counts as a Match?\n\nTwo principles match when:\n- They express the same core idea\n- You could swap them and the meaning stays\n- It's not just similar words\n\n**Match**: \"Fail fast, fail loud\" (Source A) ≈ \"Expose errors immediately\" (Source B)\n**Not a Match**: \"Fail fast\" ≈ \"Fail safely\" (similar words, different ideas)\n\n---\n\n## What You'll Get\n\n### The Breakdown\n\n```\nComparing Source A (hash: a1b2c3d4) with Source B (hash: e5f6g7h8):\n\nSHARED PATTERNS (N=2 Validated) ✓\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\nP1: \"Compression that preserves meaning demonstrates comprehension\"\n    Source A: \"True understanding shows in lossless compression\"\n    Source B: \"If you can compress without losing meaning, you understand\"\n    Alignment: High confidence — same idea, different words\n\nUNIQUE TO SOURCE A\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\nA1: \"Constraints force creativity\" (N=1, needs validation)\n\nUNIQUE TO SOURCE B\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\nB1: \"Documentation is a love letter to future self\" (N=1, needs validation)\n\nWhat's next:\n- The shared pattern is now validated (N=2) — real signal!\n- Add a third source to promote to N≥3 (Golden Master candidate)\n- Investigate unique principles — domain-sp"},{"path":"_meta.json","content":"{\n  \"ownerId\": \"kn709ajvpej12sahm1ay1262qs80ehps\",\n  \"slug\": \"pattern-finder\",\n  \"version\": \"1.0.1\",\n  \"publishedAt\": 1770708215708\n}"}],"languages":[],"docsSourceLabel":"CLAWHUB","editorialOverview":"Discover what two sources agree on — find the signal in the noise. Skill: Pattern Finder Owner: leegitw Summary: Discover what two sources agree on — find the signal in the noise. Tags: latest:1.0.1 Version history: v1.0.1 | 2026-02-10T07:23:35.708Z | user Migrated to public GitHub repo, updated homepage URLs v1.0.0 | 2026-02-05T08:06:37.596Z | auto Pattern Finder 1.0.0 initial release: - New skill for discovering shared patterns between two sources. - Identifies principles that app","editorialQuality":{"score":100,"threshold":65,"status":"ready","wordCount":846,"uniquenessScore":56,"reasons":[]}},"media":{"evidence":{"source":"no-media","verified":false,"confidence":"low","updatedAt":"2026-04-15T00:45:39.800Z","emptyReason":"No screenshots, media assets, or demo links are available."},"primaryImageUrl":null,"mediaAssetCount":0,"assets":[],"demoUrl":null},"ownerResources":{"evidence":{"source":"unclaimed","verified":false,"confidence":"low","updatedAt":"2026-04-15T00:45:39.800Z","emptyReason":"This page has not been claimed by the agent owner."},"hasCustomPage":false,"customPageUpdatedAt":null,"customLinks":[],"structuredLinks":{"docsUrl":null,"demoUrl":null,"supportUrl":null,"pricingUrl":null,"statusUrl":null},"customPage":null},"relatedAgents":{"evidence":{"source":"protocol-neighbors","verified":false,"confidence":"medium","updatedAt":"2026-10-09T10:16:46.803Z","emptyReason":null},"items":[{"id":"b917f68a-ebff-438e-84f8-3f4b2494c0bc","entityType":"agent","canonicalPath":"/agent/activepieces-activepieces","slug":"activepieces-activepieces","name":"activepieces","description":"AI Agents & MCPs & AI Workflow Automation • (~400 MCP servers for AI agents) • AI Automation / AI Agent with MCPs • AI Workflows & AI Agents • MCPs for AI Agents","url":"https://github.com/activepieces/activepieces","homepage":"https://www.activepieces.com","source":"GITHUB_REPOS","protocols":["OPENCLAW"],"capabilities":[],"safetyScore":100,"overallRank":70,"updatedAt":"2026-04-15T02:22:12.426Z","createdAt":"2026-02-25T03:38:12.412Z","downloads":null},{"id":"5cb26759-3a39-483f-94cf-276a98c13bb8","entityType":"agent","canonicalPath":"/agent/cherryhq-cherry-studio","slug":"cherryhq-cherry-studio","name":"cherry-studio","description":"AI productivity studio with smart chat, autonomous agents, and 300+ assistants. Unified access to frontier LLMs","url":"https://github.com/CherryHQ/cherry-studio","homepage":"https://cherry-ai.com","source":"GITHUB_REPOS","protocols":["MCP","OPENCLAW"],"capabilities":[],"safetyScore":100,"overallRank":70,"updatedAt":"2026-04-11T14:38:40.986Z","createdAt":"2026-02-25T03:38:19.379Z","downloads":null},{"id":"8ebccd8e-3863-4187-8355-c3f14e1f9edf","entityType":"agent","canonicalPath":"/agent/iofficeai-aionui","slug":"iofficeai-aionui","name":"AionUi","description":"Free, local, open-source 24/7 Cowork app and OpenClaw for Gemini CLI, Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Qwen Code, Goose CLI, Auggie, and more | 🌟 Star if you like it!","url":"https://github.com/iOfficeAI/AionUi","homepage":"https://www.aionui.com","source":"GITHUB_REPOS","protocols":["MCP","OPENCLAW"],"capabilities":[],"safetyScore":100,"overallRank":70,"updatedAt":"2026-04-10T18:48:31.762Z","createdAt":"2026-02-25T03:38:16.584Z","downloads":null},{"id":"6f6582d0-5d76-4f0f-b81d-86520247950b","entityType":"agent","canonicalPath":"/agent/copilotkit-copilotkit","slug":"copilotkit-copilotkit","name":"CopilotKit","description":"The Frontend for Agents & Generative UI. React + Angular","url":"https://github.com/CopilotKit/CopilotKit","homepage":"https://docs.copilotkit.ai","source":"GITHUB_REPOS","protocols":["OPENCLAW"],"capabilities":[],"safetyScore":100,"overallRank":70,"updatedAt":"2026-03-25T09:50:57.846Z","createdAt":"2026-02-25T03:39:14.617Z","downloads":null}],"links":{"hub":"/agent","source":"/agent/source/clawhub","protocols":[{"label":"OpenClaw","href":"/agent/protocol/openclew"}]}}}