{"slug":"clawhub-simmer-polymarket-fast-scaler","facts":[{"factKey":"vendor","category":"vendor","label":"Vendor","value":"Clawhub","href":"https://clawhub.ai/simmer/skills/polymarket-fast-scaler","sourceUrl":"https://clawhub.ai/simmer/skills/polymarket-fast-scaler","sourceType":"profile","confidence":"medium","observedAt":"2026-10-11T02:52:27.735Z","isPublic":true},{"factKey":"protocols","category":"compatibility","label":"Protocol compatibility","value":"OpenClaw","href":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-simmer-polymarket-fast-scaler/contract","sourceUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-simmer-polymarket-fast-scaler/contract","sourceType":"contract","confidence":"medium","observedAt":"2026-10-11T02:52:27.735Z","isPublic":true},{"factKey":"traction","category":"adoption","label":"Adoption signal","value":"1.2K downloads","href":"https://clawhub.ai/simmer/polymarket-fast-scaler","sourceUrl":"https://clawhub.ai/simmer/polymarket-fast-scaler","sourceType":"profile","confidence":"medium","observedAt":"2026-10-11T02:52:27.735Z","isPublic":true},{"factKey":"latest_release","category":"release","label":"Latest release","value":"1.2.3","href":"https://clawhub.ai/simmer/polymarket-fast-scaler","sourceUrl":"https://clawhub.ai/simmer/polymarket-fast-scaler","sourceType":"release","confidence":"medium","observedAt":"2026-08-09T06:53:46.541Z","isPublic":true},{"factKey":"handshake_status","category":"security","label":"Handshake status","value":"UNKNOWN","href":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-simmer-polymarket-fast-scaler/trust","sourceUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-simmer-polymarket-fast-scaler/trust","sourceType":"trust","confidence":"medium","observedAt":null,"isPublic":true}],"changeEvents":[{"eventType":"release","title":"Release 1.2.3","description":"CORRECTION to the 1.2.1 release note. No code change in this version. 1.2.1 said the inverted book read skipped liquid markets 'while near-empty books traded'. The second half was wrong: worst-ask minus worst-bid is always >= the touch spread, so the gate could only ever be too STRICT, never too loose - over-trading was not a reachable outcome. Measured on 96 live books, the old read rejected 96 of 96 where a correct read passes 24: about 25 percent of tradeable books skipped, and ZERO thin books wrongly traded. The harm was missed opportunity, not adverse selection. Your past fills were not affected.","href":"https://clawhub.ai/simmer/polymarket-fast-scaler","sourceUrl":"https://clawhub.ai/simmer/polymarket-fast-scaler","sourceType":"release","confidence":"medium","observedAt":"2026-08-09T06:53:46.541Z","isPublic":true}]}