{"id":"d1b8dc26-765d-4743-9c44-b8ce8439b5c5","entityType":"agent","slug":"clawhub-skills-1kalin-afrexai-proposal-engine","name":"afrexai-proposal-engine","canonicalUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/agent/clawhub-skills-1kalin-afrexai-proposal-engine","canonicalPath":"/agent/clawhub-skills-1kalin-afrexai-proposal-engine","generatedAt":"2026-10-09T14:05:42.758Z","source":"CLAWHUB","claimStatus":"UNCLAIMED","verificationTier":"NONE","summary":{"evidence":{"source":"editorial-content","verified":true,"confidence":"high","updatedAt":"2026-04-15T00:45:39.800Z","emptyReason":null},"description":"Proposal Engine — Win More Deals Proposal Engine — Win More Deals Turn discovery calls into winning proposals. Full lifecycle: qualify → scope → price → write → present → close. When to Use - Client says \"send me a proposal\" - After a discovery call or meeting - Responding to an RFP/RFI - Creating a statement of work (SOW) - Pricing a new project or retainer 1. Pre-Proposal Qualification (Don't Waste Time) Before writing anything, score the opportun","descriptionLabel":"Technical summary","evidenceSummary":"Capability contract not published. No trust telemetry is available yet. Last updated 4/15/2026.","installCommand":"clawhub skill install skills:1kalin:afrexai-proposal-engine","sourceUrl":"https://github.com/openclaw/skills/tree/main/skills/1kalin/afrexai-proposal-engine","homepage":null,"primaryLinks":[{"label":"View on ClawHub","url":"https://github.com/openclaw/skills/tree/main/skills/1kalin/afrexai-proposal-engine","kind":"source"}],"safetyScore":84,"overallRank":62,"popularityScore":50,"trustScore":null,"claimedByName":null,"isOwner":false,"seoDescription":"Proposal Engine — Win More Deals Proposal Engine — Win More Deals Turn discovery calls into winning proposals. Full lifecycle: qualify → scope → price → write →"},"coverage":{"evidence":{"source":"public-profile","verified":false,"confidence":"medium","updatedAt":"2026-04-15T00:45:39.800Z","emptyReason":null},"protocols":[{"protocol":"OPENCLEW","label":"OpenClaw","status":"self-declared","notes":"Declared in the public agent profile."}],"capabilities":[{"label":"deliver","status":"self-declared"},{"label":"address","status":"self-declared"},{"label":"restructure","status":"self-declared"},{"label":"tone","status":"self-declared"}],"verifiedCount":0,"selfDeclaredCount":5,"capabilityMatrix":{"rows":[{"key":"OPENCLEW","type":"protocol","support":"unknown","confidenceSource":"profile","notes":"Listed on profile"},{"key":"deliver","type":"capability","support":"supported","confidenceSource":"profile","notes":"Declared in agent profile metadata"},{"key":"address","type":"capability","support":"supported","confidenceSource":"profile","notes":"Declared in agent profile metadata"},{"key":"restructure","type":"capability","support":"supported","confidenceSource":"profile","notes":"Declared in agent profile metadata"},{"key":"tone","type":"capability","support":"supported","confidenceSource":"profile","notes":"Declared in agent profile metadata"}],"flattenedTokens":"protocol:OPENCLEW|unknown|profile capability:deliver|supported|profile capability:address|supported|profile capability:restructure|supported|profile capability:tone|supported|profile"}},"adoption":{"evidence":{"source":"no-adoption-signals","verified":false,"confidence":"low","updatedAt":"2026-04-15T00:45:39.800Z","emptyReason":"No source adoption metrics were available."},"stars":null,"forks":null,"downloads":null,"packageName":null,"latestVersion":null,"tractionLabel":null},"release":{"evidence":{"source":"agent-index","verified":false,"confidence":"medium","updatedAt":"2026-02-25T06:17:56.611Z","emptyReason":null},"lastUpdatedAt":"2026-04-15T00:45:39.800Z","lastCrawledAt":"2026-02-25T06:17:56.611Z","lastIndexedAt":null,"nextCrawlAt":"2026-02-26T06:17:56.611Z","lastVerifiedAt":null,"highlights":[]},"execution":{"evidence":{"source":"CLAWHUB","verified":false,"confidence":"low","updatedAt":null,"emptyReason":"No published capability contract is available yet."},"installCommand":"clawhub skill install skills:1kalin:afrexai-proposal-engine","setupComplexity":"low","setupSteps":["Setup complexity is LOW. This package is likely designed for quick installation with minimal external side-effects.","Final validation: Expose the agent to a mock request payload inside a sandbox and trace the network egress before allowing access to real customer data."],"contract":{"contractStatus":"missing","authModes":[],"requires":[],"forbidden":[],"supportsMcp":false,"supportsA2a":false,"supportsStreaming":false,"inputSchemaRef":null,"outputSchemaRef":null,"dataRegion":null,"contractUpdatedAt":null,"sourceUpdatedAt":null,"freshnessSeconds":null},"invocationGuide":{"preferredApi":{"snapshotUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-skills-1kalin-afrexai-proposal-engine/snapshot","contractUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-skills-1kalin-afrexai-proposal-engine/contract","trustUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-skills-1kalin-afrexai-proposal-engine/trust"},"curlExamples":["curl -s \"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-skills-1kalin-afrexai-proposal-engine/snapshot\"","curl -s \"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-skills-1kalin-afrexai-proposal-engine/contract\"","curl -s \"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-skills-1kalin-afrexai-proposal-engine/trust\""],"jsonRequestTemplate":{"query":"summarize this repo","constraints":{"maxLatencyMs":2000,"protocolPreference":["OPENCLEW"]}},"jsonResponseTemplate":{"ok":true,"result":{"summary":"...","confidence":0.9},"meta":{"source":"CLAWHUB","generatedAt":"2026-10-09T14:05:42.758Z"}},"retryPolicy":{"maxAttempts":3,"backoffMs":[500,1500,3500],"retryableConditions":["HTTP_429","HTTP_503","NETWORK_TIMEOUT"]}},"endpoints":{"dossierUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-skills-1kalin-afrexai-proposal-engine/dossier","snapshotUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-skills-1kalin-afrexai-proposal-engine/snapshot","contractUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-skills-1kalin-afrexai-proposal-engine/contract","trustUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-skills-1kalin-afrexai-proposal-engine/trust"}},"reliability":{"evidence":{"source":"runtime-metrics","verified":false,"confidence":"low","updatedAt":null,"emptyReason":"No trust, reliability, or runtime telemetry is available."},"trust":{"status":"unavailable","handshakeStatus":"UNKNOWN","verificationFreshnessHours":null,"reputationScore":null,"p95LatencyMs":null,"successRate30d":null,"fallbackRate":null,"attempts30d":null,"trustUpdatedAt":null,"trustConfidence":"unknown","sourceUpdatedAt":null,"freshnessSeconds":null},"decisionGuardrails":{"doNotUseIf":["Contract metadata is missing or unavailable for deterministic execution."],"safeUseWhen":[],"riskFlags":["missing_or_unavailable_contract","trust_data_unavailable","schema_references_missing"],"operationalConfidence":"low"},"executionMetrics":{"observedLatencyMsP50":null,"observedLatencyMsP95":null,"estimatedCostUsd":null,"uptime30d":null,"rateLimitRpm":null,"rateLimitBurst":null,"lastVerifiedAt":null,"verificationSource":null},"runtimeMetrics":{"successRate":null,"avgLatencyMs":null,"avgCostUsd":null,"hallucinationRate":null,"retryRate":null,"disputeRate":null,"p50Latency":null,"p95Latency":null,"lastUpdated":null}},"benchmarks":{"evidence":{"source":"no-benchmark-data","verified":false,"confidence":"low","updatedAt":null,"emptyReason":"No benchmark suites or observed failure patterns are available."},"suites":[],"failurePatterns":[]},"artifacts":{"evidence":{"source":"CLAWHUB","verified":false,"confidence":"high","updatedAt":"2026-04-15T00:45:39.800Z","emptyReason":null},"readme":"# Proposal Engine — Win More Deals\n\nTurn discovery calls into winning proposals. Full lifecycle: qualify → scope → price → write → present → close.\n\n## When to Use\n\n- Client says \"send me a proposal\"\n- After a discovery call or meeting\n- Responding to an RFP/RFI\n- Creating a statement of work (SOW)\n- Pricing a new project or retainer\n\n## 1. Pre-Proposal Qualification (Don't Waste Time)\n\nBefore writing anything, score the opportunity:\n\n### BANT-Plus Framework\n\n```yaml\nqualification:\n  budget:\n    score: 0-3  # 0=unknown, 1=below range, 2=in range, 3=confirmed+funded\n    notes: \"\"\n  authority:\n    score: 0-3  # 0=no access, 1=influencer only, 2=decision maker involved, 3=signer in room\n    notes: \"\"\n  need:\n    score: 0-3  # 0=nice-to-have, 1=want, 2=need, 3=urgent/painful\n    notes: \"\"\n  timeline:\n    score: 0-3  # 0=someday, 1=this quarter, 2=this month, 3=this week/ASAP\n    notes: \"\"\n  competition:\n    score: 0-3  # 0=3+ competitors, 1=2 competitors, 2=1 competitor, 3=sole source\n    notes: \"\"\n  champion:\n    score: 0-3  # 0=no internal advocate, 1=passive, 2=active, 3=actively selling for you\n    notes: \"\"\n  total: 0     # Sum of all scores. Max=18\n```\n\n**Decision matrix:**\n| Score | Action |\n|-------|--------|\n| 14-18 | Full custom proposal — invest heavily |\n| 10-13 | Standard proposal with light customization |\n| 6-9 | Template proposal or decline politely |\n| 0-5 | Decline — not qualified. Send a polite \"not a fit\" email |\n\n### Disqualification Signals (Walk Away)\n- They want a proposal before a real conversation\n- \"We're just getting quotes\" (you're column fodder)\n- No budget conversation allowed\n- Decision maker won't attend any meeting\n- Timeline is \"whenever\" with no urgency driver\n- They want you to do unpaid strategy work in the proposal\n\n## 2. Discovery Extraction\n\nAfter a discovery call, extract these into structured notes:\n\n```yaml\ndiscovery:\n  client:\n    company: \"\"\n    industry: \"\"\n    size: \"\"  # employees, revenue range\n    decision_makers:\n      - name: \"\"\n        role: \"\"\n        priorities: []\n        communication_style: \"\"  # analytical, driver, expressive, amiable\n  \n  situation:\n    current_state: \"\"\n    trigger_event: \"\"  # What happened that made them look for help NOW?\n    previous_attempts: []  # What have they tried? Why didn't it work?\n    constraints: []  # Budget, timeline, technical, political, regulatory\n  \n  desired_outcome:\n    primary_goal: \"\"\n    success_metrics: []  # How will they measure success? Get NUMBERS.\n    dream_state: \"\"  # \"If this goes perfectly, what does it look like in 12 months?\"\n    fears: []  # What are they afraid will go wrong?\n  \n  decision_process:\n    steps: []  # \"What happens between receiving our proposal and starting?\"\n    stakeholders: []  # Who else weighs in?\n    timeline: \"\"\n    budget_range: \"\"\n    competing_options: []\n  \n  value_drivers:\n    revenue_impact: \"\"  # Will this make them money? How much?\n    cost_savings: \"\"  # Will this save them money? How much?\n    risk_reduction: \"\"  # What risks does this eliminate?\n    strategic_value: \"\"  # How does this advance their bigger goals?\n```\n\n**Key rule:** If you can't fill in `success_metrics` with numbers, you don't have enough discovery. Go back and ask.\n\n## 3. Pricing Strategy\n\n### Cost-Plus Pricing (Floor)\n```\nHours × Rate + Materials + Buffer = Floor Price\nNever price below this. It's your minimum, not your target.\n```\n\n### Value-Based Pricing (Target)\n```\nClient's expected value from the project = X\nYour price should be 10-20% of X\nIf X = $500K revenue increase, price = $50K-$100K\n```\n\n### Three-Tier Pricing (Always Present Options)\n\n**Always offer exactly 3 options.** Anchoring psychology makes the middle option feel like the best deal.\n\n```yaml\npricing_tiers:\n  good:\n    name: \"\"  # e.g., \"Foundation\", \"Essential\", \"Starter\"\n    price: 0\n    description: \"Solves the core problem\"\n    includes:\n      - \"Core deliverable 1\"\n      - \"Core deliverable 2\"\n    excludes:\n      - \"Everything in Better/Best\"\n    timeline: \"\"\n    best_for: \"Budget-conscious, clear scope, minimal customization\"\n    \n  better:\n    name: \"\"  # e.g., \"Growth\", \"Professional\", \"Recommended\"  \n    price: 0  # 1.5-2.5x of Good\n    description: \"Core + optimization + support\"\n    includes:\n      - \"Everything in Good\"\n      - \"Additional deliverable 1\"\n      - \"Additional deliverable 2\"\n      - \"30 days support\"\n    timeline: \"\"\n    best_for: \"Best value — most clients choose this\"\n    recommended: true  # Mark this one visually\n    \n  best:\n    name: \"\"  # e.g., \"Enterprise\", \"Premium\", \"Partnership\"\n    price: 0  # 2-4x of Good\n    description: \"Full transformation + ongoing partnership\"\n    includes:\n      - \"Everything in Better\"\n      - \"Premium deliverable 1\"\n      - \"Premium deliverable 2\"  \n      - \"90 days support\"\n      - \"Quarterly reviews\"\n    timeline: \"\"\n    best_for: \"Maximum results, full partnership\"\n```\n\n**Pricing rules:**\n1. Never show hourly rates — price the outcome, not the time\n2. Good option should still be profitable (don't create a loss leader)\n3. Better option is your target — design it to be obviously the best value\n4. Best option is the anchor — makes Better look reasonable\n5. Use round numbers ending in 0 or 5 (not $12,347)\n6. Annual/retainer pricing: show monthly equivalent AND total (monthly feels smaller)\n\n### Payment Terms\n\n```yaml\npayment_terms:\n  project:  # For fixed-scope projects\n    deposit: \"50% on signing\"\n    milestone_1: \"25% on [milestone]\"\n    final: \"25% on delivery + approval\"\n    late_fee: \"1.5%/month after 30 days\"\n    \n  retainer:  # For ongoing work\n    billing: \"Monthly, billed in advance\"\n    minimum_term: \"3 months\"\n    unused_hours: \"Do not roll over\"\n    overage_rate: \"$X/hour\"\n    cancellation: \"30 days written notice\"\n    \n  saas:  # For software/platform\n    billing: \"Annual (2 months free) or monthly\"\n    payment_method: \"Credit card on file\"\n    refund_policy: \"30-day money-back guarantee\"\n```\n\n## 4. Proposal Structure\n\n### The Winning Formula\n\nEvery proposal follows this arc: **Mirror → Solve → Prove → Ask**\n\n```\n1. Their World (Mirror)     — Show you understand their situation\n2. The Gap (Problem)        — Articulate what's broken/missing\n3. The Bridge (Solution)    — Your approach to closing the gap\n4. The Proof (Evidence)     — Why you specifically can deliver\n5. The Path (Plan)          — How you'll get there, step by step\n6. The Investment (Pricing) — Three options, value-framed\n7. The Ask (Next Steps)     — Exactly what happens when they say yes\n```\n\n### Section-by-Section Guide\n\n#### Cover Page\n```\n[Client Logo] + [Your Logo]\n\"[Project Name]: [Outcome-Focused Subtitle]\"\nPrepared for: [Decision Maker Name], [Title]\nPrepared by: [Your Name], [Title]\nDate: [Date]\nValid until: [Date + 30 days]\nConfidential\n```\n\n#### 1. Executive Summary (1 page max)\n\nWrite this LAST but put it FIRST. The decision maker may only read this page.\n\nTemplate:\n```\n[Client] is facing [specific challenge] that is costing approximately \n[quantified impact — dollars, hours, risk]. After [discovery call/meeting], \nwe understand that your priority is [primary goal] by [timeline].\n\nWe propose [one-sentence solution] that will [primary outcome + metric]. \nBased on [similar project/experience], we expect [specific result] \nwithin [timeframe].\n\nThree engagement options are detailed below, ranging from $[Good price] \nto $[Best price]. We recommend [Better option name] for the optimal \nbalance of speed, thoroughness, and value.\n\nNext step: [specific action] by [date].\n```\n\n**Rules:**\n- No jargon. Write at 8th grade reading level.\n- Include at least one number (cost of inaction, expected ROI, timeline).\n- Name the decision maker. This is personal.\n\n#### 2. Understanding Your Situation (Mirror)\n\nRestate what you learned in discovery. Use their exact words where possible.\n\n```\nCurrent state: [What they told you about today]\nTrigger: [Why they're looking for help NOW]\nImpact: [What this problem is costing them — quantified]\nPrevious attempts: [What they've tried, why it fell short]\nDesired outcome: [What success looks like — in THEIR words]\n```\n\n**Why this works:** When prospects see their own words reflected back accurately, trust skyrockets. They think \"these people actually listened.\"\n\n#### 3. Proposed Solution\n\nStructure: What → Why → How\n\n```\nWhat we'll deliver:\n- [Deliverable 1]: [One sentence on what it is and why it matters]\n- [Deliverable 2]: [One sentence]\n- [Deliverable 3]: [One sentence]\n\nWhy this approach:\n- [Reason 1 — tied to their specific situation]\n- [Reason 2 — addresses a concern they raised]\n- [Reason 3 — differentiates from alternatives]\n\nWhat's explicitly NOT included:\n- [Out of scope item 1]\n- [Out of scope item 2]\n(This prevents scope creep and manages expectations)\n```\n\n#### 4. Proof & Credibility\n\nPick 2-3 of these (not all):\n\n```yaml\nproof_elements:\n  case_study:\n    client: \"[Similar company]\"\n    challenge: \"[Similar problem]\"\n    solution: \"[What you did]\"\n    result: \"[Quantified outcome]\"\n    timeline: \"[How long it took]\"\n    \n  testimonial:\n    quote: \"\"\n    attribution: \"[Name, Title, Company]\"\n    \n  credentials:\n    - \"[Relevant certification]\"\n    - \"[Years of experience in this specific area]\"\n    - \"[Number of similar projects completed]\"\n    \n  methodology:\n    name: \"\"\n    description: \"Brief explanation of your proven process\"\n    \n  guarantee:\n    type: \"\"  # money-back, performance, satisfaction\n    terms: \"\"\n```\n\n**Rule:** Every proof element must be relevant to THIS client's situation. Generic \"we're great\" claims are worse than no proof at all.\n\n#### 5. Project Plan & Timeline\n\n```yaml\ntimeline:\n  phase_1:\n    name: \"Discovery & Planning\"\n    duration: \"\"\n    activities:\n      - task: \"\"\n        owner: \"\"  # \"Us\" or \"Client\"\n    deliverable: \"\"\n    milestone: \"\"  # What signals this phase is complete?\n    client_requirements: []  # What do you need from them?\n    \n  phase_2:\n    name: \"Build / Execute\"\n    duration: \"\"\n    activities: []\n    deliverable: \"\"\n    milestone: \"\"\n    client_requirements: []\n    \n  phase_3:\n    name: \"Review & Launch\"\n    duration: \"\"\n    activities: []\n    deliverable: \"\"\n    milestone: \"\"\n    client_requirements: []\n    \n  ongoing:  # If applicable\n    name: \"Support & Optimization\"\n    duration: \"\"\n    activities: []\n    review_cadence: \"\"\n```\n\n**Include client responsibilities.** Delays are almost always caused by the client. Document what you need from them and when.\n\n#### 6. Investment (Pricing)\n\nPresent the three tiers from Section 3. Frame as investment, not cost.\n\n```\nROI framing:\n\"The [Better] option is an investment of $X. Based on [discovery data], \nwe expect this to [generate/save] $Y within [timeframe], representing \na [N]x return.\"\n\nCost of inaction:\n\"Every month without a solution, [Client] is [losing $X / spending Y hours / \nrisking Z]. Over the proposal validity period alone, that's $[amount].\"\n```\n\n#### 7. Next Steps & Terms\n\n```\nTo proceed:\n1. Select your preferred option (Good / Better / Best)\n2. Sign this proposal (e-signature below or reply \"approved\")\n3. Submit deposit of [amount]\n4. Kickoff call scheduled within [X] business days\n\nThis proposal is valid until [date — 14-30 days].\nAfter that, pricing and availability may change.\n```\n\n### Terms to include:\n- Payment schedule\n- Revision/change request process (with cost implications)\n- Cancellation terms\n- IP ownership (who owns the deliverables?)\n- Confidentiality\n- Limitation of liability\n\n## 5. Proposal Quality Checklist\n\nScore each dimension 0-10. Minimum 70/100 before sending.\n\n| # | Dimension | Check | Score |\n|---|-----------|-------|-------|\n| 1 | **Relevance** | Does every section reference THEIR specific situation? | /10 |\n| 2 | **Clarity** | Could a non-expert understand what you're proposing? | /10 |\n| 3 | **Proof** | Are claims backed by data, cases, or testimonials? | /10 |\n| 4 | **Value framing** | Is ROI/cost-of-inaction clearly articulated? | /10 |\n| 5 | **Specificity** | Concrete deliverables, dates, numbers (not vague promises)? | /10 |\n| 6 | **Objection handling** | Does it preemptively address likely concerns? | /10 |\n| 7 | **Visual quality** | Clean formatting, easy to scan, professional? | /10 |\n| 8 | **Call to action** | Crystal clear next steps with timeline? | /10 |\n| 9 | **Risk reduction** | Guarantees, testimonials, or milestones that reduce buyer fear? | /10 |\n| 10 | **Competitive edge** | Does it show why YOU vs alternatives? | /10 |\n\n## 6. Proposal Delivery & Follow-Up\n\n### Delivery Rules\n1. **Never email a proposal cold.** Present it live (call/meeting) or send with a Loom video walkthrough.\n2. Send PDF + a one-paragraph email. Don't bury it in a wall of text.\n3. Subject line: \"[Client Name] × [Your Company] — Proposal for [Outcome]\"\n\n### Follow-Up Cadence\n\n```yaml\nfollow_up:\n  day_0: \"Send proposal + personal video walkthrough (2-3 min)\"\n  day_2: \"Quick check-in: 'Did you have a chance to review? Any questions?'\"\n  day_5: \"Value-add: Share a relevant article, case study, or insight\"\n  day_8: \"Direct ask: 'Are you leaning toward an option? Happy to jump on a quick call'\"\n  day_14: \"Scarcity: 'Proposal valid until [date]. Want to lock in the timeline?'\"\n  day_21: \"Last touch: 'Wanted to check in one final time. If timing isn't right, no worries — happy to revisit when it makes sense.'\"\n  day_30: \"Close the loop: Move to 'closed-lost' if no response. Send graceful close email.\"\n```\n\n### Objection Response Templates\n\n**\"It's too expensive\"**\n→ Reframe to value: \"I understand. Let me ask — if this [achieves outcome], what would that be worth to your business over 12 months? The investment is [X]% of that value.\"\n→ Offer the Good tier: \"We also have the [Good option] at $[X] that covers the core need.\"\n\n**\"We need to think about it\"**\n→ Diagnose: \"Absolutely. To help you evaluate — is there a specific concern I can address, or information you need that would help the decision?\"\n\n**\"We're looking at other options\"**\n→ Differentiate: \"Smart to compare. What criteria are most important in your decision? I want to make sure our proposal addresses what matters most.\"\n\n**\"The timeline doesn't work\"**\n→ Adapt: \"When would be ideal? Let me see if we can restructure phases to align with your timeline.\"\n\n**\"We need to get approval from [someone]\"**\n→ Enable: \"Happy to join a brief call with [person] to answer any questions directly. Would that help speed things up?\"\n\n## 7. Proposal Templates by Type\n\n### Consulting/Advisory Proposal\nFocus on: situation analysis, methodology, expected outcomes, engagement structure\nTone: authoritative, advisory\nPricing: project fee or monthly retainer\nKey proof: similar client results, methodology name\n\n### Software/Technical Proposal\nFocus on: technical approach, architecture overview, integration plan, support\nTone: clear, technical but accessible\nPricing: project phases + ongoing license/maintenance\nKey proof: technical credentials, uptime stats, security compliance\n\n### Creative/Agency Proposal\nFocus on: creative vision, mood boards/references, deliverable list, revision process\nTone: confident, visually-driven\nPricing: project fee with defined revision rounds\nKey proof: portfolio samples, brand work examples\n\n### RFP Response\nFocus on: point-by-point compliance, differentiators, team bios, references\nTone: formal, thorough\nPricing: as specified in RFP\nKey proof: relevant contract experience, certifications, references\n**Tip:** Answer every question in the RFP even if irrelevant. Non-responsive = disqualified.\n\n## 8. Common Mistakes (Avoid These)\n\n1. **Writing about yourself first.** Lead with THEIR problem, not your company bio.\n2. **One option only.** Always offer 3 tiers. One option = take it or leave it.\n3. **Vague deliverables.** \"Marketing strategy\" means nothing. \"30-page go-to-market playbook covering channels, budget allocation, and 90-day campaign calendar\" means everything.\n4. **No deadline.** Open-ended proposals die. Always include expiration date.\n5. **Sending without presenting.** Proposals sent blind close at 10-20%. Presented live: 40-60%.\n6. **No follow-up system.** 80% of deals close after the 5th follow-up. Most people stop at 1.\n7. **Burying the price.** Don't make them hunt for it. Investment section should be easy to find.\n8. **Ignoring the real decision maker.** If you're writing for the wrong person, you've already lost.\n9. **Over-designing, under-writing.** Beautiful PDF with weak content loses to ugly doc with killer strategy.\n10. **Not quantifying value.** If you can't show ROI, the price is always \"too much.\"\n\n## Quick Start\n\n**\"Create a proposal for [client]\"** → I'll walk you through discovery extraction, qualification scoring, pricing strategy, and generate the full proposal with follow-up plan.\n\n**\"Score this opportunity: [details]\"** → BANT-Plus qualification score with go/no-go recommendation.\n\n**\"Help me price [project]\"** → Three-tier pricing with value framing and payment terms.\n\n**\"Review my proposal: [paste/file]\"** → Quality checklist score with specific improvement suggestions.\n\n---\n\n*Built by AfrexAI — AI-powered business tools that actually work.*\n","readmeExcerpt":"Proposal Engine — Win More Deals Turn discovery calls into winning proposals. Full lifecycle: qualify → scope → price → write → present → close. When to Use - Client says \"send me a proposal\" - After a discovery call or meeting - Responding to an RFP/RFI - Creating a statement of work (SOW) - Pricing a new project or retainer 1. Pre-Proposal Qualification (Don't Waste Time) Before writing anything, score the opportun","codeSnippets":[],"executableExamples":[{"language":"yaml","snippet":"qualification:\n  budget:\n    score: 0-3  # 0=unknown, 1=below range, 2=in range, 3=confirmed+funded\n    notes: \"\"\n  authority:\n    score: 0-3  # 0=no access, 1=influencer only, 2=decision maker involved, 3=signer in room\n    notes: \"\"\n  need:\n    score: 0-3  # 0=nice-to-have, 1=want, 2=need, 3=urgent/painful\n    notes: \"\"\n  timeline:\n    score: 0-3  # 0=someday, 1=this quarter, 2=this month, 3=this week/ASAP\n    notes: \"\"\n  competition:\n    score: 0-3  # 0=3+ competitors, 1=2 competitors, 2=1 competitor, 3=sole source\n    notes: \"\"\n  champion:\n    score: 0-3  # 0=no internal advocate, 1=passive, 2=active, 3=actively selling for you\n    notes: \"\"\n  total: 0     # Sum of all scores. Max=18"},{"language":"yaml","snippet":"discovery:\n  client:\n    company: \"\"\n    industry: \"\"\n    size: \"\"  # employees, revenue range\n    decision_makers:\n      - name: \"\"\n        role: \"\"\n        priorities: []\n        communication_style: \"\"  # analytical, driver, expressive, amiable\n  \n  situation:\n    current_state: \"\"\n    trigger_event: \"\"  # What happened that made them look for help NOW?\n    previous_attempts: []  # What have they tried? Why didn't it work?\n    constraints: []  # Budget, timeline, technical, political, regulatory\n  \n  desired_outcome:\n    primary_goal: \"\"\n    success_metrics: []  # How will they measure success? Get NUMBERS.\n    dream_state: \"\"  # \"If this goes perfectly, what does it look like in 12 months?\"\n    fears: []  # What are they afraid will go wrong?\n  \n  decision_process:\n    steps: []  # \"What happens between receiving our proposal and starting?\"\n    stakeholders: []  # Who else weighs in?\n    timeline: \"\"\n    budget_range: \"\"\n    competing_options: []\n  \n  value_drivers:\n    revenue_impact: \"\"  # Will this make them money? How much?\n    cost_savings: \"\"  # Will this save them money? How much?\n    risk_reduction: \"\"  # What risks does this eliminate?\n    strategic_value: \"\"  # How does this advance their bigger goals?"},{"language":"text","snippet":"Hours × Rate + Materials + Buffer = Floor Price\nNever price below this. It's your minimum, not your target."},{"language":"text","snippet":"Client's expected value from the project = X\nYour price should be 10-20% of X\nIf X = $500K revenue increase, price = $50K-$100K"},{"language":"yaml","snippet":"pricing_tiers:\n  good:\n    name: \"\"  # e.g., \"Foundation\", \"Essential\", \"Starter\"\n    price: 0\n    description: \"Solves the core problem\"\n    includes:\n      - \"Core deliverable 1\"\n      - \"Core deliverable 2\"\n    excludes:\n      - \"Everything in Better/Best\"\n    timeline: \"\"\n    best_for: \"Budget-conscious, clear scope, minimal customization\"\n    \n  better:\n    name: \"\"  # e.g., \"Growth\", \"Professional\", \"Recommended\"  \n    price: 0  # 1.5-2.5x of Good\n    description: \"Core + optimization + support\"\n    includes:\n      - \"Everything in Good\"\n      - \"Additional deliverable 1\"\n      - \"Additional deliverable 2\"\n      - \"30 days support\"\n    timeline: \"\"\n    best_for: \"Best value — most clients choose this\"\n    recommended: true  # Mark this one visually\n    \n  best:\n    name: \"\"  # e.g., \"Enterprise\", \"Premium\", \"Partnership\"\n    price: 0  # 2-4x of Good\n    description: \"Full transformation + ongoing partnership\"\n    includes:\n      - \"Everything in Better\"\n      - \"Premium deliverable 1\"\n      - \"Premium deliverable 2\"  \n      - \"90 days support\"\n      - \"Quarterly reviews\"\n    timeline: \"\"\n    best_for: \"Maximum results, full partnership\""},{"language":"yaml","snippet":"payment_terms:\n  project:  # For fixed-scope projects\n    deposit: \"50% on signing\"\n    milestone_1: \"25% on [milestone]\"\n    final: \"25% on delivery + approval\"\n    late_fee: \"1.5%/month after 30 days\"\n    \n  retainer:  # For ongoing work\n    billing: \"Monthly, billed in advance\"\n    minimum_term: \"3 months\"\n    unused_hours: \"Do not roll over\"\n    overage_rate: \"$X/hour\"\n    cancellation: \"30 days written notice\"\n    \n  saas:  # For software/platform\n    billing: \"Annual (2 months free) or monthly\"\n    payment_method: \"Credit card on file\"\n    refund_policy: \"30-day money-back guarantee\""}],"parameters":{},"dependencies":[],"permissions":[],"extractedFiles":[],"languages":["typescript"],"docsSourceLabel":"CLAWHUB","editorialOverview":"Proposal Engine — Win More Deals Proposal Engine — Win More Deals Turn discovery calls into winning proposals. Full lifecycle: qualify → scope → price → write → present → close. When to Use - Client says \"send me a proposal\" - After a discovery call or meeting - Responding to an RFP/RFI - Creating a statement of work (SOW) - Pricing a new project or retainer 1. Pre-Proposal Qualification (Don't Waste Time) Before writing anything, score the opportun","editorialQuality":{"score":100,"threshold":65,"status":"ready","wordCount":378,"uniquenessScore":69,"reasons":[]}},"media":{"evidence":{"source":"no-media","verified":false,"confidence":"low","updatedAt":"2026-04-15T00:45:39.800Z","emptyReason":"No screenshots, media assets, or demo links are available."},"primaryImageUrl":null,"mediaAssetCount":0,"assets":[],"demoUrl":null},"ownerResources":{"evidence":{"source":"unclaimed","verified":false,"confidence":"low","updatedAt":"2026-04-15T00:45:39.800Z","emptyReason":"This page has not been claimed by the agent owner."},"hasCustomPage":false,"customPageUpdatedAt":null,"customLinks":[],"structuredLinks":{"docsUrl":null,"demoUrl":null,"supportUrl":null,"pricingUrl":null,"statusUrl":null},"customPage":null},"relatedAgents":{"evidence":{"source":"protocol-neighbors","verified":false,"confidence":"medium","updatedAt":"2026-10-09T14:05:42.758Z","emptyReason":null},"items":[{"id":"b917f68a-ebff-438e-84f8-3f4b2494c0bc","entityType":"agent","canonicalPath":"/agent/activepieces-activepieces","slug":"activepieces-activepieces","name":"activepieces","description":"AI Agents & MCPs & AI Workflow Automation • (~400 MCP servers for AI agents) • AI Automation / AI Agent with MCPs • AI Workflows & AI Agents • MCPs for AI Agents","url":"https://github.com/activepieces/activepieces","homepage":"https://www.activepieces.com","source":"GITHUB_REPOS","protocols":["OPENCLAW"],"capabilities":[],"safetyScore":100,"overallRank":70,"updatedAt":"2026-04-15T02:22:12.426Z","createdAt":"2026-02-25T03:38:12.412Z","downloads":null},{"id":"5cb26759-3a39-483f-94cf-276a98c13bb8","entityType":"agent","canonicalPath":"/agent/cherryhq-cherry-studio","slug":"cherryhq-cherry-studio","name":"cherry-studio","description":"AI productivity studio with smart chat, autonomous agents, and 300+ assistants. Unified access to frontier LLMs","url":"https://github.com/CherryHQ/cherry-studio","homepage":"https://cherry-ai.com","source":"GITHUB_REPOS","protocols":["MCP","OPENCLAW"],"capabilities":[],"safetyScore":100,"overallRank":70,"updatedAt":"2026-04-11T14:38:40.986Z","createdAt":"2026-02-25T03:38:19.379Z","downloads":null},{"id":"8ebccd8e-3863-4187-8355-c3f14e1f9edf","entityType":"agent","canonicalPath":"/agent/iofficeai-aionui","slug":"iofficeai-aionui","name":"AionUi","description":"Free, local, open-source 24/7 Cowork app and OpenClaw for Gemini CLI, Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Qwen Code, Goose CLI, Auggie, and more | 🌟 Star if you like it!","url":"https://github.com/iOfficeAI/AionUi","homepage":"https://www.aionui.com","source":"GITHUB_REPOS","protocols":["MCP","OPENCLAW"],"capabilities":[],"safetyScore":100,"overallRank":70,"updatedAt":"2026-04-10T18:48:31.762Z","createdAt":"2026-02-25T03:38:16.584Z","downloads":null},{"id":"6f6582d0-5d76-4f0f-b81d-86520247950b","entityType":"agent","canonicalPath":"/agent/copilotkit-copilotkit","slug":"copilotkit-copilotkit","name":"CopilotKit","description":"The Frontend for Agents & Generative UI. React + Angular","url":"https://github.com/CopilotKit/CopilotKit","homepage":"https://docs.copilotkit.ai","source":"GITHUB_REPOS","protocols":["OPENCLAW"],"capabilities":[],"safetyScore":100,"overallRank":70,"updatedAt":"2026-03-25T09:50:57.846Z","createdAt":"2026-02-25T03:39:14.617Z","downloads":null}],"links":{"hub":"/agent","source":"/agent/source/clawhub","protocols":[{"label":"OpenClaw","href":"/agent/protocol/openclew"}]}}}