{"id":"85dc697c-47e3-4fe6-896e-69d972b6f875","entityType":"agent","slug":"clawhub-zhouzy-creator-svn-code-review","name":"svn-code-review","canonicalUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/agent/clawhub-zhouzy-creator-svn-code-review","canonicalPath":"/agent/clawhub-zhouzy-creator-svn-code-review","generatedAt":"2026-10-12T17:59:20.485Z","source":"CLAWHUB","claimStatus":"UNCLAIMED","verificationTier":"NONE","summary":{"evidence":{"source":"editorial-content","verified":true,"confidence":"high","updatedAt":"2026-10-11T23:35:10.707Z","emptyReason":null},"description":"Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements Skill: svn-code-review Owner: zhouzy-creator Summary: Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements Tags: latest:0.1.1 Version history: v0.1.1 | 2026-08-29T08:46:51.012Z | auto - Added README.md to provide general documentation for the skill. - Removed skill-card.md from the project. v0.1.0 | 2026-04-20T08:43:11.337Z | auto Initial release of svn-code-revi","descriptionLabel":"Technical summary","evidenceSummary":"Capability contract not published. No trust telemetry is available yet. 975 downloads reported by the source. Last updated 10/11/2026.","installCommand":"clawhub skill install s174enc8xnnpwsvz16pg3ge6rx8573mb:svn-code-review","sourceUrl":"https://clawhub.ai/zhouzy-creator/svn-code-review","homepage":"https://clawhub.ai/zhouzy-creator/skills/svn-code-review","primaryLinks":[{"label":"View on ClawHub","url":"https://clawhub.ai/zhouzy-creator/svn-code-review","kind":"source"},{"label":"Homepage","url":"https://clawhub.ai/zhouzy-creator/skills/svn-code-review","kind":"homepage"}],"safetyScore":84,"overallRank":62,"popularityScore":60,"trustScore":null,"claimedByName":null,"isOwner":false,"seoDescription":"Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements Skill: svn-code-review Owner: zhouzy-creator Summary"},"coverage":{"evidence":{"source":"public-profile","verified":false,"confidence":"medium","updatedAt":"2026-10-11T23:35:10.707Z","emptyReason":null},"protocols":[{"protocol":"OPENCLEW","label":"OpenClaw","status":"self-declared","notes":"Declared in the public agent profile."}],"capabilities":[],"verifiedCount":0,"selfDeclaredCount":1,"capabilityMatrix":{"rows":[{"key":"OPENCLEW","type":"protocol","support":"unknown","confidenceSource":"profile","notes":"Listed on profile"}],"flattenedTokens":"protocol:OPENCLEW|unknown|profile"}},"adoption":{"evidence":{"source":"CLAWHUB","verified":false,"confidence":"medium","updatedAt":"2026-10-11T23:35:10.707Z","emptyReason":null},"stars":null,"forks":null,"downloads":975,"likes":null,"task":null,"library":null,"packageName":null,"latestVersion":"0.1.1","tractionLabel":"975 downloads"},"release":{"evidence":{"source":"CLAWHUB","verified":false,"confidence":"medium","updatedAt":"2026-10-11T23:35:10.596Z","emptyReason":null},"lastUpdatedAt":"2026-10-11T23:35:10.707Z","lastCrawledAt":"2026-10-11T23:35:10.596Z","lastIndexedAt":null,"nextCrawlAt":"2026-10-12T23:35:10.596Z","lastVerifiedAt":null,"highlights":[{"version":"0.1.1","createdAt":"2026-08-29T08:46:51.012Z","changelog":"- Added README.md to provide general documentation for the skill. - Removed skill-card.md from the project.","fileCount":5,"zipByteSize":4763},{"version":"0.1.0","createdAt":"2026-04-20T08:43:11.337Z","changelog":"Initial release of svn-code-review documentation and workflow guidance. - Introduced clear guidelines for when to request code reviews, emphasizing review after each task and before major merges. - Added detailed instructions for gathering SVN revision numbers and dispatching a code-reviewer subagent. - Provided examples illustrating the code review request and feedback process. - Outlined integration strategies for different development workflows (subagent-driven, batch, ad-hoc). - Listed red flags and correct handling of reviewer feedback to ensure quality and accountability.","fileCount":4,"zipByteSize":4717}]},"execution":{"evidence":{"source":"CLAWHUB","verified":false,"confidence":"low","updatedAt":null,"emptyReason":"No published capability contract is available yet."},"installCommand":"clawhub skill install s174enc8xnnpwsvz16pg3ge6rx8573mb:svn-code-review","setupComplexity":"low","setupSteps":["Setup complexity is LOW. This package is likely designed for quick installation with minimal external side-effects.","Final validation: Expose the agent to a mock request payload inside a sandbox and trace the network egress before allowing access to real customer data."],"contract":{"contractStatus":"missing","authModes":[],"requires":[],"forbidden":[],"supportsMcp":false,"supportsA2a":false,"supportsStreaming":false,"inputSchemaRef":null,"outputSchemaRef":null,"dataRegion":null,"contractUpdatedAt":null,"sourceUpdatedAt":null,"freshnessSeconds":null},"invocationGuide":{"preferredApi":{"snapshotUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-zhouzy-creator-svn-code-review/snapshot","contractUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-zhouzy-creator-svn-code-review/contract","trustUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-zhouzy-creator-svn-code-review/trust"},"curlExamples":["curl -s \"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-zhouzy-creator-svn-code-review/snapshot\"","curl -s \"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-zhouzy-creator-svn-code-review/contract\"","curl -s \"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-zhouzy-creator-svn-code-review/trust\""],"jsonRequestTemplate":{"query":"summarize this repo","constraints":{"maxLatencyMs":2000,"protocolPreference":["OPENCLEW"]}},"jsonResponseTemplate":{"ok":true,"result":{"summary":"...","confidence":0.9},"meta":{"source":"CLAWHUB","generatedAt":"2026-10-12T17:59:20.484Z"}},"retryPolicy":{"maxAttempts":3,"backoffMs":[500,1500,3500],"retryableConditions":["HTTP_429","HTTP_503","NETWORK_TIMEOUT"]}},"endpoints":{"dossierUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-zhouzy-creator-svn-code-review/dossier","snapshotUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-zhouzy-creator-svn-code-review/snapshot","contractUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-zhouzy-creator-svn-code-review/contract","trustUrl":"https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-zhouzy-creator-svn-code-review/trust"}},"reliability":{"evidence":{"source":"runtime-metrics","verified":false,"confidence":"low","updatedAt":null,"emptyReason":"No trust, reliability, or runtime telemetry is available."},"trust":{"status":"unavailable","handshakeStatus":"UNKNOWN","verificationFreshnessHours":null,"reputationScore":null,"p95LatencyMs":null,"successRate30d":null,"fallbackRate":null,"attempts30d":null,"trustUpdatedAt":null,"trustConfidence":"unknown","sourceUpdatedAt":null,"freshnessSeconds":null},"decisionGuardrails":{"doNotUseIf":["Contract metadata is missing or unavailable for deterministic execution."],"safeUseWhen":[],"riskFlags":["missing_or_unavailable_contract","trust_data_unavailable","schema_references_missing"],"operationalConfidence":"low"},"executionMetrics":{"observedLatencyMsP50":null,"observedLatencyMsP95":null,"estimatedCostUsd":null,"uptime30d":null,"rateLimitRpm":null,"rateLimitBurst":null,"lastVerifiedAt":null,"verificationSource":null},"runtimeMetrics":{"successRate":null,"avgLatencyMs":null,"avgCostUsd":null,"hallucinationRate":null,"retryRate":null,"disputeRate":null,"p50Latency":null,"p95Latency":null,"lastUpdated":null}},"benchmarks":{"evidence":{"source":"no-benchmark-data","verified":false,"confidence":"low","updatedAt":null,"emptyReason":"No benchmark suites or observed failure patterns are available."},"suites":[],"failurePatterns":[]},"artifacts":{"evidence":{"source":"CLAWHUB","verified":false,"confidence":"high","updatedAt":"2026-10-11T23:35:10.707Z","emptyReason":null},"readme":"Skill: svn-code-review\n\nOwner: zhouzy-creator\n\nSummary: Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements\n\nTags: latest:0.1.1\n\nVersion history:\n\nv0.1.1 | 2026-08-29T08:46:51.012Z | auto\n\n- Added README.md to provide general documentation for the skill.\n- Removed skill-card.md from the project.\n\nv0.1.0 | 2026-04-20T08:43:11.337Z | auto\n\nInitial release of svn-code-review documentation and workflow guidance.\n\n- Introduced clear guidelines for when to request code reviews, emphasizing review after each task and before major merges.\n- Added detailed instructions for gathering SVN revision numbers and dispatching a code-reviewer subagent.\n- Provided examples illustrating the code review request and feedback process.\n- Outlined integration strategies for different development workflows (subagent-driven, batch, ad-hoc).\n- Listed red flags and correct handling of reviewer feedback to ensure quality and accountability.\n\nArchive index:\n\nArchive v0.1.1: 5 files, 4763 bytes\n\nFiles: code-reviewer.md (3400b), README.md (17b), skill-card.md (1759b), SKILL.md (3087b), _meta.json (134b)\n\nFile v0.1.1:SKILL.md\n\n---\nname: svn-code-review\ndescription: Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements\nversion: 1.0.0\n---\n\n# Requesting Code Review\n\nDispatch code-reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade. The reviewer gets precisely crafted context for evaluation — never your session's history. This keeps the reviewer focused on the work product, not your thought process, and preserves your own context for continued work.\n\n**Core principle:** Review early, review often.\n\n## When to Request Review\n\n**Mandatory:**\n- After each task in subagent-driven development\n- After completing major feature\n- Before merge to main\n\n**Optional but valuable:**\n- When stuck (fresh perspective)\n- Before refactoring (baseline check)\n- After fixing complex bug\n\n## How to Request\n\n**1. Get SVN revision numbers:**\n```bash\nBASE_REV=$(svn info | grep 'Revision:' | awk '{print $2}')  # or previous revision\nHEAD_REV=$(svn info | grep 'Revision:' | awk '{print $2}')  # current revision\n# Example: BASE_REV=100, HEAD_REV=105\n```\n\n**2. Dispatch code-reviewer subagent:**\n\nUse Task tool with superpowers:code-reviewer type, fill template at `code-reviewer.md`\n\n**Placeholders:**\n- `{WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED}` - What you just built\n- `{PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS}` - What it should do\n- `{BASE_REV}` - Starting revision\n- `{HEAD_REV}` - Ending revision\n- `{DESCRIPTION}` - Brief summary\n\n**3. Act on feedback:**\n- Fix Critical issues immediately\n- Fix Important issues before proceeding\n- Note Minor issues for later\n- Push back if reviewer is wrong (with reasoning)\n\n## Example\n\n```\n[Just completed Task 2: Add verification function]\n\nYou: Let me request code review before proceeding.\n\nBASE_REV=$(svn info | grep 'Revision:' | awk '{print $2}')  # Previous revision\nHEAD_REV=$(svn info | grep 'Revision:' | awk '{print $2}')  # Current revision\n\n[Dispatch superpowers:code-reviewer subagent]\n  WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED: Verification and repair functions for conversation index\n  PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task 2 from docs/superpowers/plans/deployment-plan.md\n  BASE_REV: 100\n  HEAD_REV: 105\n  DESCRIPTION: Added verifyIndex() and repairIndex() with 4 issue types\n\n[Subagent returns]:\n  Strengths: Clean architecture, real tests\n  Issues:\n    Important: Missing progress indicators\n    Minor: Magic number (100) for reporting interval\n  Assessment: Ready to proceed\n\nYou: [Fix progress indicators]\n[Continue to Task 3]\n```\n\n## Integration with Workflows\n\n**Subagent-Driven Development:**\n- Review after EACH task\n- Catch issues before they compound\n- Fix before moving to next task\n\n**Executing Plans:**\n- Review after each batch (3 tasks)\n- Get feedback, apply, continue\n\n**Ad-Hoc Development:**\n- Review before merge\n- Review when stuck\n\n## Red Flags\n\n**Never:**\n- Skip review because \"it's simple\"\n- Ignore Critical issues\n- Proceed with unfixed Important issues\n- Argue with valid technical feedback\n\n**If reviewer wrong:**\n- Push back with technical reasoning\n- Show code/tests that prove it works\n- Request clarification\n\nSee template at: code-reviewer.md\n\nFile v0.1.1:README.md\n\n# svn_code_review\n\nFile v0.1.1:_meta.json\n\n{\n  \"ownerId\": \"kn767vanfp2m604bkg5dgcbshn857e7k\",\n  \"slug\": \"svn-code-review\",\n  \"version\": \"0.1.1\",\n  \"publishedAt\": 1787993211012\n}\n\nFile v0.1.1:code-reviewer.md\n\n# Code Review Agent\n\nYou are reviewing code changes for production readiness.\n\n**Your task:**\n1. Review {WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED}\n2. Compare against {PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS}\n3. Check code quality, architecture, testing\n4. Categorize issues by severity\n5. Assess production readiness\n\n## What Was Implemented\n\n{DESCRIPTION}\n\n## Requirements/Plan\n\n{PLAN_REFERENCE}\n\n## SVN Revision Range to Review\n\n**Base:** r{BASE_REV}\n**Head:** r{HEAD_REV}\n\n```bash\nsvn diff -r {BASE_REV}:{HEAD_REV} --stat\nsvn diff -r {BASE_REV}:{HEAD_REV}\n```\n\n## Review Checklist\n\n**Code Quality:**\n- Clean separation of concerns?\n- Proper error handling?\n- Type safety (if applicable)?\n- DRY principle followed?\n- Edge cases handled?\n\n**Architecture:**\n- Sound design decisions?\n- Scalability considerations?\n- Performance implications?\n- Security concerns?\n\n**Testing:**\n- Tests actually test logic (not mocks)?\n- Edge cases covered?\n- Integration tests where needed?\n- All tests passing?\n\n**Requirements:**\n- All plan requirements met?\n- Implementation matches spec?\n- No scope creep?\n- Breaking changes documented?\n\n**Production Readiness:**\n- Migration strategy (if schema changes)?\n- Backward compatibility considered?\n- Documentation complete?\n- No obvious bugs?\n\n## Output Format\n\n### Strengths\n[What's well done? Be specific.]\n\n### Issues\n\n#### Critical (Must Fix)\n[Bugs, security issues, data loss risks, broken functionality]\n\n#### Important (Should Fix)\n[Architecture problems, missing features, poor error handling, test gaps]\n\n#### Minor (Nice to Have)\n[Code style, optimization opportunities, documentation improvements]\n\n**For each issue:**\n- File:line reference\n- What's wrong\n- Why it matters\n- How to fix (if not obvious)\n\n### Recommendations\n[Improvements for code quality, architecture, or process]\n\n### Assessment\n\n**Ready to merge?** [Yes/No/With fixes]\n\n**Reasoning:** [Technical assessment in 1-2 sentences]\n\n## Critical Rules\n\n**DO:**\n- Categorize by actual severity (not everything is Critical)\n- Be specific (file:line, not vague)\n- Explain WHY issues matter\n- Acknowledge strengths\n- Give clear verdict\n\n**DON'T:**\n- Say \"looks good\" without checking\n- Mark nitpicks as Critical\n- Give feedback on code you didn't review\n- Be vague (\"improve error handling\")\n- Avoid giving a clear verdict\n\n## Example Output\n\n```\n### Strengths\n- Clean database schema with proper migrations (db.ts:15-42)\n- Comprehensive test coverage (18 tests, all edge cases)\n- Good error handling with fallbacks (summarizer.ts:85-92)\n\n### Issues\n\n#### Important\n1. **Missing help text in CLI wrapper**\n   - File: index-conversations:1-31\n   - Issue: No --help flag, users won't discover --concurrency\n   - Fix: Add --help case with usage examples\n\n2. **Date validation missing**\n   - File: search.ts:25-27\n   - Issue: Invalid dates silently return no results\n   - Fix: Validate ISO format, throw error with example\n\n#### Minor\n1. **Progress indicators**\n   - File: indexer.ts:130\n   - Issue: No \"X of Y\" counter for long operations\n   - Impact: Users don't know how long to wait\n\n### Recommendations\n- Add progress reporting for user experience\n- Consider config file for excluded projects (portability)\n\n### Assessment\n\n**Ready to merge: With fixes**\n\n**Reasoning:** Core implementation is solid with good architecture and tests. Important issues (help text, date validation) are easily fixed and don't affect core functionality.\n```\n\nFile v0.1.1:skill-card.md\n\n## Description:\n\nUse when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements.\n\nThis skill is ready for commercial/non-commercial use.\n\n## Publisher:\n\n[zhouzy-creator](https://clawhub.ai/user/zhouzy-creator)\n\n### License/Terms of Use:\n\nMIT-0\n\n## Use Case:\n\nDevelopers and engineers use this skill to request focused reviews of SVN revision ranges before continuing development or merging changes. It helps structure review prompts around requirements, implementation details, code quality, testing, and production readiness.\n\n### Deployment Geography for Use:\n\nGlobal\n\n## Known Risks and Mitigations:\n\nRisk: The review workflow may send more implementation context or diff content to a code-review subagent than necessary.\n\nMitigation: Pass only the diffs, requirements, and summary needed for the review, and review the returned findings before acting on them.\n\n## Reference(s):\n\n- [Source repository](https://github.com/zhouzy-creator/svn_code_review)\n- [ClawHub skill page](https://clawhub.ai/zhouzy-creator/skills/svn-code-review)\n\n## Skill Output:\n\n**Output Type(s):** [markdown, shell commands, guidance]\n\n**Output Format:** [Markdown review guidance with SVN diff shell commands and structured review output.]\n\n**Output Parameters:** [1D]\n\n**Other Properties Related to Output:** [Prompts a code-review subagent with a bounded SVN revision range and implementation context.]\n\n## Skill Version(s):\n\n0.1.1 (source: server release metadata)\n\n## Ethical Considerations:\n\nUsers should evaluate whether this skill is appropriate for their environment, review any generated or modified files before relying on them, and apply their organization's safety, security, and compliance requirements before deployment.\n\nArchive v0.1.0: 4 files, 4717 bytes\n\nFiles: code-reviewer.md (3400b), skill-card.md (1955b), SKILL.md (3087b), _meta.json (134b)\n\nFile v0.1.0:SKILL.md\n\n---\nname: svn-code-review\ndescription: Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements\nversion: 1.0.0\n---\n\n# Requesting Code Review\n\nDispatch code-reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade. The reviewer gets precisely crafted context for evaluation — never your session's history. This keeps the reviewer focused on the work product, not your thought process, and preserves your own context for continued work.\n\n**Core principle:** Review early, review often.\n\n## When to Request Review\n\n**Mandatory:**\n- After each task in subagent-driven development\n- After completing major feature\n- Before merge to main\n\n**Optional but valuable:**\n- When stuck (fresh perspective)\n- Before refactoring (baseline check)\n- After fixing complex bug\n\n## How to Request\n\n**1. Get SVN revision numbers:**\n```bash\nBASE_REV=$(svn info | grep 'Revision:' | awk '{print $2}')  # or previous revision\nHEAD_REV=$(svn info | grep 'Revision:' | awk '{print $2}')  # current revision\n# Example: BASE_REV=100, HEAD_REV=105\n```\n\n**2. Dispatch code-reviewer subagent:**\n\nUse Task tool with superpowers:code-reviewer type, fill template at `code-reviewer.md`\n\n**Placeholders:**\n- `{WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED}` - What you just built\n- `{PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS}` - What it should do\n- `{BASE_REV}` - Starting revision\n- `{HEAD_REV}` - Ending revision\n- `{DESCRIPTION}` - Brief summary\n\n**3. Act on feedback:**\n- Fix Critical issues immediately\n- Fix Important issues before proceeding\n- Note Minor issues for later\n- Push back if reviewer is wrong (with reasoning)\n\n## Example\n\n```\n[Just completed Task 2: Add verification function]\n\nYou: Let me request code review before proceeding.\n\nBASE_REV=$(svn info | grep 'Revision:' | awk '{print $2}')  # Previous revision\nHEAD_REV=$(svn info | grep 'Revision:' | awk '{print $2}')  # Current revision\n\n[Dispatch superpowers:code-reviewer subagent]\n  WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED: Verification and repair functions for conversation index\n  PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task 2 from docs/superpowers/plans/deployment-plan.md\n  BASE_REV: 100\n  HEAD_REV: 105\n  DESCRIPTION: Added verifyIndex() and repairIndex() with 4 issue types\n\n[Subagent returns]:\n  Strengths: Clean architecture, real tests\n  Issues:\n    Important: Missing progress indicators\n    Minor: Magic number (100) for reporting interval\n  Assessment: Ready to proceed\n\nYou: [Fix progress indicators]\n[Continue to Task 3]\n```\n\n## Integration with Workflows\n\n**Subagent-Driven Development:**\n- Review after EACH task\n- Catch issues before they compound\n- Fix before moving to next task\n\n**Executing Plans:**\n- Review after each batch (3 tasks)\n- Get feedback, apply, continue\n\n**Ad-Hoc Development:**\n- Review before merge\n- Review when stuck\n\n## Red Flags\n\n**Never:**\n- Skip review because \"it's simple\"\n- Ignore Critical issues\n- Proceed with unfixed Important issues\n- Argue with valid technical feedback\n\n**If reviewer wrong:**\n- Push back with technical reasoning\n- Show code/tests that prove it works\n- Request clarification\n\nSee template at: code-reviewer.md\n\nFile v0.1.0:_meta.json\n\n{\n  \"ownerId\": \"kn767vanfp2m604bkg5dgcbshn857e7k\",\n  \"slug\": \"svn-code-review\",\n  \"version\": \"0.1.0\",\n  \"publishedAt\": 1776674591337\n}\n\nFile v0.1.0:code-reviewer.md\n\n# Code Review Agent\n\nYou are reviewing code changes for production readiness.\n\n**Your task:**\n1. Review {WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED}\n2. Compare against {PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS}\n3. Check code quality, architecture, testing\n4. Categorize issues by severity\n5. Assess production readiness\n\n## What Was Implemented\n\n{DESCRIPTION}\n\n## Requirements/Plan\n\n{PLAN_REFERENCE}\n\n## SVN Revision Range to Review\n\n**Base:** r{BASE_REV}\n**Head:** r{HEAD_REV}\n\n```bash\nsvn diff -r {BASE_REV}:{HEAD_REV} --stat\nsvn diff -r {BASE_REV}:{HEAD_REV}\n```\n\n## Review Checklist\n\n**Code Quality:**\n- Clean separation of concerns?\n- Proper error handling?\n- Type safety (if applicable)?\n- DRY principle followed?\n- Edge cases handled?\n\n**Architecture:**\n- Sound design decisions?\n- Scalability considerations?\n- Performance implications?\n- Security concerns?\n\n**Testing:**\n- Tests actually test logic (not mocks)?\n- Edge cases covered?\n- Integration tests where needed?\n- All tests passing?\n\n**Requirements:**\n- All plan requirements met?\n- Implementation matches spec?\n- No scope creep?\n- Breaking changes documented?\n\n**Production Readiness:**\n- Migration strategy (if schema changes)?\n- Backward compatibility considered?\n- Documentation complete?\n- No obvious bugs?\n\n## Output Format\n\n### Strengths\n[What's well done? Be specific.]\n\n### Issues\n\n#### Critical (Must Fix)\n[Bugs, security issues, data loss risks, broken functionality]\n\n#### Important (Should Fix)\n[Architecture problems, missing features, poor error handling, test gaps]\n\n#### Minor (Nice to Have)\n[Code style, optimization opportunities, documentation improvements]\n\n**For each issue:**\n- File:line reference\n- What's wrong\n- Why it matters\n- How to fix (if not obvious)\n\n### Recommendations\n[Improvements for code quality, architecture, or process]\n\n### Assessment\n\n**Ready to merge?** [Yes/No/With fixes]\n\n**Reasoning:** [Technical assessment in 1-2 sentences]\n\n## Critical Rules\n\n**DO:**\n- Categorize by actual severity (not everything is Critical)\n- Be specific (file:line, not vague)\n- Explain WHY issues matter\n- Acknowledge strengths\n- Give clear verdict\n\n**DON'T:**\n- Say \"looks good\" without checking\n- Mark nitpicks as Critical\n- Give feedback on code you didn't review\n- Be vague (\"improve error handling\")\n- Avoid giving a clear verdict\n\n## Example Output\n\n```\n### Strengths\n- Clean database schema with proper migrations (db.ts:15-42)\n- Comprehensive test coverage (18 tests, all edge cases)\n- Good error handling with fallbacks (summarizer.ts:85-92)\n\n### Issues\n\n#### Important\n1. **Missing help text in CLI wrapper**\n   - File: index-conversations:1-31\n   - Issue: No --help flag, users won't discover --concurrency\n   - Fix: Add --help case with usage examples\n\n2. **Date validation missing**\n   - File: search.ts:25-27\n   - Issue: Invalid dates silently return no results\n   - Fix: Validate ISO format, throw error with example\n\n#### Minor\n1. **Progress indicators**\n   - File: indexer.ts:130\n   - Issue: No \"X of Y\" counter for long operations\n   - Impact: Users don't know how long to wait\n\n### Recommendations\n- Add progress reporting for user experience\n- Consider config file for excluded projects (portability)\n\n### Assessment\n\n**Ready to merge: With fixes**\n\n**Reasoning:** Core implementation is solid with good architecture and tests. Important issues (help text, date validation) are easily fixed and don't affect core functionality.\n```\n\nFile v0.1.0:skill-card.md\n\n## Description: <br>\nUse when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements. <br>\n\nThis skill is ready for commercial/non-commercial use. <br>\n\n## Publisher: <br>\n[zhouzy-creator](https://clawhub.ai/user/zhouzy-creator) <br>\n\n### License/Terms of Use: <br>\nMIT-0 <br>\n\n\n## Use Case: <br>\nDevelopers and engineering agents use this skill to request focused SVN-based code reviews after tasks, before major merges, or when a fresh technical assessment is needed. <br>\n\n### Deployment Geography for Use: <br>\nGlobal <br>\n\n## Known Risks and Mitigations: <br>\nRisk: SVN diffs may expose source code or sensitive implementation details to an agent review context. <br>\nMitigation: Use the skill only on code that is appropriate to share with the configured review agent and review context. <br>\nRisk: An incorrect SVN revision range can produce an incomplete or overly broad review. <br>\nMitigation: Confirm the base and head revisions before dispatching the review request. <br>\n\n\n## Reference(s): <br>\n- [ClawHub skill page](https://clawhub.ai/zhouzy-creator/svn-code-review) <br>\n- [Code review agent template](code-reviewer.md) <br>\n\n\n## Skill Output: <br>\n**Output Type(s):** [guidance, markdown, shell commands] <br>\n**Output Format:** [Markdown guidance with inline SVN shell commands and review-template placeholders] <br>\n**Output Parameters:** [1D] <br>\n**Other Properties Related to Output:** [Produces a focused code-review request and expected review structure; no API calls or credentials are required by the artifact.] <br>\n\n## Skill Version(s): <br>\n1.0.0 (source: frontmatter; release metadata version 0.1.0) <br>\n\n## Ethical Considerations: <br>\nUsers should evaluate whether this skill is appropriate for their environment, review any generated or modified files before relying on them, and apply their organization's safety, security, and compliance requirements before deployment. <br>","readmeExcerpt":"Skill: svn-code-review Owner: zhouzy-creator Summary: Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements Tags: latest:0.1.1 Version history: v0.1.1 | 2026-08-29T08:46:51.012Z | auto - Added README.md to provide general documentation for the skill. - Removed skill-card.md from the project. v0.1.0 | 2026-04-20T08:43:11.337Z | auto Initial release of svn-code-revi","codeSnippets":[],"executableExamples":[{"language":"bash","snippet":"BASE_REV=$(svn info | grep 'Revision:' | awk '{print $2}')  # or previous revision\nHEAD_REV=$(svn info | grep 'Revision:' | awk '{print $2}')  # current revision\n# Example: BASE_REV=100, HEAD_REV=105"},{"language":"text","snippet":"[Just completed Task 2: Add verification function]\n\nYou: Let me request code review before proceeding.\n\nBASE_REV=$(svn info | grep 'Revision:' | awk '{print $2}')  # Previous revision\nHEAD_REV=$(svn info | grep 'Revision:' | awk '{print $2}')  # Current revision\n\n[Dispatch superpowers:code-reviewer subagent]\n  WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED: Verification and repair functions for conversation index\n  PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task 2 from docs/superpowers/plans/deployment-plan.md\n  BASE_REV: 100\n  HEAD_REV: 105\n  DESCRIPTION: Added verifyIndex() and repairIndex() with 4 issue types\n\n[Subagent returns]:\n  Strengths: Clean architecture, real tests\n  Issues:\n    Important: Missing progress indicators\n    Minor: Magic number (100) for reporting interval\n  Assessment: Ready to proceed\n\nYou: [Fix progress indicators]\n[Continue to Task 3]"},{"language":"bash","snippet":"svn diff -r {BASE_REV}:{HEAD_REV} --stat\nsvn diff -r {BASE_REV}:{HEAD_REV}"},{"language":"text","snippet":"### Strengths\n- Clean database schema with proper migrations (db.ts:15-42)\n- Comprehensive test coverage (18 tests, all edge cases)\n- Good error handling with fallbacks (summarizer.ts:85-92)\n\n### Issues\n\n#### Important\n1. **Missing help text in CLI wrapper**\n   - File: index-conversations:1-31\n   - Issue: No --help flag, users won't discover --concurrency\n   - Fix: Add --help case with usage examples\n\n2. **Date validation missing**\n   - File: search.ts:25-27\n   - Issue: Invalid dates silently return no results\n   - Fix: Validate ISO format, throw error with example\n\n#### Minor\n1. **Progress indicators**\n   - File: indexer.ts:130\n   - Issue: No \"X of Y\" counter for long operations\n   - Impact: Users don't know how long to wait\n\n### Recommendations\n- Add progress reporting for user experience\n- Consider config file for excluded projects (portability)\n\n### Assessment\n\n**Ready to merge: With fixes**\n\n**Reasoning:** Core implementation is solid with good architecture and tests. Important issues (help text, date validation) are easily fixed and don't affect core functionality."},{"language":"bash","snippet":"BASE_REV=$(svn info | grep 'Revision:' | awk '{print $2}')  # or previous revision\nHEAD_REV=$(svn info | grep 'Revision:' | awk '{print $2}')  # current revision\n# Example: BASE_REV=100, HEAD_REV=105"},{"language":"text","snippet":"[Just completed Task 2: Add verification function]\n\nYou: Let me request code review before proceeding.\n\nBASE_REV=$(svn info | grep 'Revision:' | awk '{print $2}')  # Previous revision\nHEAD_REV=$(svn info | grep 'Revision:' | awk '{print $2}')  # Current revision\n\n[Dispatch superpowers:code-reviewer subagent]\n  WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED: Verification and repair functions for conversation index\n  PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task 2 from docs/superpowers/plans/deployment-plan.md\n  BASE_REV: 100\n  HEAD_REV: 105\n  DESCRIPTION: Added verifyIndex() and repairIndex() with 4 issue types\n\n[Subagent returns]:\n  Strengths: Clean architecture, real tests\n  Issues:\n    Important: Missing progress indicators\n    Minor: Magic number (100) for reporting interval\n  Assessment: Ready to proceed\n\nYou: [Fix progress indicators]\n[Continue to Task 3]"}],"parameters":null,"dependencies":[],"permissions":[],"extractedFiles":[{"path":"SKILL.md","content":"---\nname: svn-code-review\ndescription: Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements\nversion: 1.0.0\n---\n\n# Requesting Code Review\n\nDispatch code-reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade. The reviewer gets precisely crafted context for evaluation — never your session's history. This keeps the reviewer focused on the work product, not your thought process, and preserves your own context for continued work.\n\n**Core principle:** Review early, review often.\n\n## When to Request Review\n\n**Mandatory:**\n- After each task in subagent-driven development\n- After completing major feature\n- Before merge to main\n\n**Optional but valuable:**\n- When stuck (fresh perspective)\n- Before refactoring (baseline check)\n- After fixing complex bug\n\n## How to Request\n\n**1. Get SVN revision numbers:**\n```bash\nBASE_REV=$(svn info | grep 'Revision:' | awk '{print $2}')  # or previous revision\nHEAD_REV=$(svn info | grep 'Revision:' | awk '{print $2}')  # current revision\n# Example: BASE_REV=100, HEAD_REV=105\n```\n\n**2. Dispatch code-reviewer subagent:**\n\nUse Task tool with superpowers:code-reviewer type, fill template at `code-reviewer.md`\n\n**Placeholders:**\n- `{WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED}` - What you just built\n- `{PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS}` - What it should do\n- `{BASE_REV}` - Starting revision\n- `{HEAD_REV}` - Ending revision\n- `{DESCRIPTION}` - Brief summary\n\n**3. Act on feedback:**\n- Fix Critical issues immediately\n- Fix Important issues before proceeding\n- Note Minor issues for later\n- Push back if reviewer is wrong (with reasoning)\n\n## Example\n\n```\n[Just completed Task 2: Add verification function]\n\nYou: Let me request code review before proceeding.\n\nBASE_REV=$(svn info | grep 'Revision:' | awk '{print $2}')  # Previous revision\nHEAD_REV=$(svn info | grep 'Revision:' | awk '{print $2}')  # Current revision\n\n[Dispatch superpowers:code-reviewer subagent]\n  WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED: Verification and repair functions for conversation index\n  PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task 2 from docs/superpowers/plans/deployment-plan.md\n  BASE_REV: 100\n  HEAD_REV: 105\n  DESCRIPTION: Added verifyIndex() and repairIndex() with 4 issue types\n\n[Subagent returns]:\n  Strengths: Clean architecture, real tests\n  Issues:\n    Important: Missing progress indicators\n    Minor: Magic number (100) for reporting interval\n  Assessment: Ready to proceed\n\nYou: [Fix progress indicators]\n[Continue to Task 3]\n```\n\n## Integration with Workflows\n\n**Subagent-Driven Development:**\n- Review after EACH task\n- Catch issues before they compound\n- Fix before moving to next task\n\n**Executing Plans:**\n- Review after each batch (3 tasks)\n- Get feedback, apply, continue\n\n**Ad-Hoc Development:**\n- Review before merge\n- Review when stuck\n\n## Red Flags\n\n**Never:**\n- Skip review because \"it's simple\"\n- Ignore Critical issues\n- Proceed with unfixed Important issues\n- Argue with valid technical feedback\n\n**If reviewer wrong:**\n- Push back with technical reasoning\n- Show code/"},{"path":"README.md","content":"# svn_code_review"},{"path":"_meta.json","content":"{\n  \"ownerId\": \"kn767vanfp2m604bkg5dgcbshn857e7k\",\n  \"slug\": \"svn-code-review\",\n  \"version\": \"0.1.1\",\n  \"publishedAt\": 1787993211012\n}"},{"path":"code-reviewer.md","content":"# Code Review Agent\n\nYou are reviewing code changes for production readiness.\n\n**Your task:**\n1. Review {WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED}\n2. Compare against {PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS}\n3. Check code quality, architecture, testing\n4. Categorize issues by severity\n5. Assess production readiness\n\n## What Was Implemented\n\n{DESCRIPTION}\n\n## Requirements/Plan\n\n{PLAN_REFERENCE}\n\n## SVN Revision Range to Review\n\n**Base:** r{BASE_REV}\n**Head:** r{HEAD_REV}\n\n```bash\nsvn diff -r {BASE_REV}:{HEAD_REV} --stat\nsvn diff -r {BASE_REV}:{HEAD_REV}\n```\n\n## Review Checklist\n\n**Code Quality:**\n- Clean separation of concerns?\n- Proper error handling?\n- Type safety (if applicable)?\n- DRY principle followed?\n- Edge cases handled?\n\n**Architecture:**\n- Sound design decisions?\n- Scalability considerations?\n- Performance implications?\n- Security concerns?\n\n**Testing:**\n- Tests actually test logic (not mocks)?\n- Edge cases covered?\n- Integration tests where needed?\n- All tests passing?\n\n**Requirements:**\n- All plan requirements met?\n- Implementation matches spec?\n- No scope creep?\n- Breaking changes documented?\n\n**Production Readiness:**\n- Migration strategy (if schema changes)?\n- Backward compatibility considered?\n- Documentation complete?\n- No obvious bugs?\n\n## Output Format\n\n### Strengths\n[What's well done? Be specific.]\n\n### Issues\n\n#### Critical (Must Fix)\n[Bugs, security issues, data loss risks, broken functionality]\n\n#### Important (Should Fix)\n[Architecture problems, missing features, poor error handling, test gaps]\n\n#### Minor (Nice to Have)\n[Code style, optimization opportunities, documentation improvements]\n\n**For each issue:**\n- File:line reference\n- What's wrong\n- Why it matters\n- How to fix (if not obvious)\n\n### Recommendations\n[Improvements for code quality, architecture, or process]\n\n### Assessment\n\n**Ready to merge?** [Yes/No/With fixes]\n\n**Reasoning:** [Technical assessment in 1-2 sentences]\n\n## Critical Rules\n\n**DO:**\n- Categorize by actual severity (not everything is Critical)\n- Be specific (file:line, not vague)\n- Explain WHY issues matter\n- Acknowledge strengths\n- Give clear verdict\n\n**DON'T:**\n- Say \"looks good\" without checking\n- Mark nitpicks as Critical\n- Give feedback on code you didn't review\n- Be vague (\"improve error handling\")\n- Avoid giving a clear verdict\n\n## Example Output\n\n```\n### Strengths\n- Clean database schema with proper migrations (db.ts:15-42)\n- Comprehensive test coverage (18 tests, all edge cases)\n- Good error handling with fallbacks (summarizer.ts:85-92)\n\n### Issues\n\n#### Important\n1. **Missing help text in CLI wrapper**\n   - File: index-conversations:1-31\n   - Issue: No --help flag, users won't discover --concurrency\n   - Fix: Add --help case with usage examples\n\n2. **Date validation missing**\n   - File: search.ts:25-27\n   - Issue: Invalid dates silently return no results\n   - Fix: Validate ISO format, throw error with example\n\n#### Minor\n1. **Progress indicators**\n   - File: indexer.ts:130\n   - Issue: No \"X of Y\" counter for long operations\n   "},{"path":"skill-card.md","content":"## Description:\n\nUse when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements.\n\nThis skill is ready for commercial/non-commercial use.\n\n## Publisher:\n\n[zhouzy-creator](https://clawhub.ai/user/zhouzy-creator)\n\n### License/Terms of Use:\n\nMIT-0\n\n## Use Case:\n\nDevelopers and engineers use this skill to request focused reviews of SVN revision ranges before continuing development or merging changes. It helps structure review prompts around requirements, implementation details, code quality, testing, and production readiness.\n\n### Deployment Geography for Use:\n\nGlobal\n\n## Known Risks and Mitigations:\n\nRisk: The review workflow may send more implementation context or diff content to a code-review subagent than necessary.\n\nMitigation: Pass only the diffs, requirements, and summary needed for the review, and review the returned findings before acting on them.\n\n## Reference(s):\n\n- [Source repository](https://github.com/zhouzy-creator/svn_code_review)\n- [ClawHub skill page](https://clawhub.ai/zhouzy-creator/skills/svn-code-review)\n\n## Skill Output:\n\n**Output Type(s):** [markdown, shell commands, guidance]\n\n**Output Format:** [Markdown review guidance with SVN diff shell commands and structured review output.]\n\n**Output Parameters:** [1D]\n\n**Other Properties Related to Output:** [Prompts a code-review subagent with a bounded SVN revision range and implementation context.]\n\n## Skill Version(s):\n\n0.1.1 (source: server release metadata)\n\n## Ethical Considerations:\n\nUsers should evaluate whether this skill is appropriate for their environment, review any generated or modified files before relying on them, and apply their organization's safety, security, and compliance requirements before deployment."}],"languages":[],"docsSourceLabel":"CLAWHUB","editorialOverview":"Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements Skill: svn-code-review Owner: zhouzy-creator Summary: Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements Tags: latest:0.1.1 Version history: v0.1.1 | 2026-08-29T08:46:51.012Z | auto - Added README.md to provide general documentation for the skill. - Removed skill-card.md from the project. v0.1.0 | 2026-04-20T08:43:11.337Z | auto Initial release of svn-code-revi","editorialQuality":{"score":100,"threshold":65,"status":"ready","wordCount":1321,"uniquenessScore":51,"reasons":[]}},"media":{"evidence":{"source":"no-media","verified":false,"confidence":"low","updatedAt":"2026-10-11T23:35:10.707Z","emptyReason":"No screenshots, media assets, or demo links are available."},"primaryImageUrl":null,"mediaAssetCount":0,"assets":[],"demoUrl":null},"ownerResources":{"evidence":{"source":"unclaimed","verified":false,"confidence":"low","updatedAt":"2026-10-11T23:35:10.707Z","emptyReason":"This page has not been claimed by the agent owner."},"hasCustomPage":false,"customPageUpdatedAt":null,"customLinks":[],"structuredLinks":{"docsUrl":null,"demoUrl":null,"supportUrl":null,"pricingUrl":null,"statusUrl":null},"customPage":null},"relatedAgents":{"evidence":{"source":"protocol-neighbors","verified":false,"confidence":"medium","updatedAt":"2026-10-12T17:59:20.485Z","emptyReason":null},"items":[{"id":"8ebccd8e-3863-4187-8355-c3f14e1f9edf","entityType":"agent","canonicalPath":"/agent/iofficeai-aionui","slug":"iofficeai-aionui","name":"AionUi","description":"Free, local, open-source 24/7 Cowork app and OpenClaw for Gemini CLI, Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Qwen Code, Goose CLI, Auggie, and more | 🌟 Star if you like it!","url":"https://github.com/iOfficeAI/AionUi","homepage":"https://www.aionui.com","source":"GITHUB_REPOS","protocols":["MCP","OPENCLAW"],"capabilities":[],"safetyScore":100,"overallRank":70,"updatedAt":"2026-10-09T19:11:12.944Z","createdAt":"2026-02-25T03:38:16.584Z","downloads":null},{"id":"b917f68a-ebff-438e-84f8-3f4b2494c0bc","entityType":"agent","canonicalPath":"/agent/activepieces-activepieces","slug":"activepieces-activepieces","name":"activepieces","description":"AI Agents & MCPs & AI Workflow Automation • (~400 MCP servers for AI agents) • AI Automation / AI Agent with MCPs • AI Workflows & AI Agents • MCPs for AI Agents","url":"https://github.com/activepieces/activepieces","homepage":"https://www.activepieces.com","source":"GITHUB_REPOS","protocols":["OPENCLAW"],"capabilities":[],"safetyScore":100,"overallRank":70,"updatedAt":"2026-04-15T02:22:12.426Z","createdAt":"2026-02-25T03:38:12.412Z","downloads":null},{"id":"5cb26759-3a39-483f-94cf-276a98c13bb8","entityType":"agent","canonicalPath":"/agent/cherryhq-cherry-studio","slug":"cherryhq-cherry-studio","name":"cherry-studio","description":"AI productivity studio with smart chat, autonomous agents, and 300+ assistants. Unified access to frontier LLMs","url":"https://github.com/CherryHQ/cherry-studio","homepage":"https://cherry-ai.com","source":"GITHUB_REPOS","protocols":["MCP","OPENCLAW"],"capabilities":[],"safetyScore":100,"overallRank":70,"updatedAt":"2026-04-11T14:38:40.986Z","createdAt":"2026-02-25T03:38:19.379Z","downloads":null},{"id":"6f6582d0-5d76-4f0f-b81d-86520247950b","entityType":"agent","canonicalPath":"/agent/copilotkit-copilotkit","slug":"copilotkit-copilotkit","name":"CopilotKit","description":"The Frontend for Agents & Generative UI. React + Angular","url":"https://github.com/CopilotKit/CopilotKit","homepage":"https://docs.copilotkit.ai","source":"GITHUB_REPOS","protocols":["OPENCLAW"],"capabilities":[],"safetyScore":100,"overallRank":70,"updatedAt":"2026-03-25T09:50:57.846Z","createdAt":"2026-02-25T03:39:14.617Z","downloads":null}],"links":{"hub":"/agent","source":"/agent/source/clawhub","protocols":[{"label":"OpenClaw","href":"/agent/protocol/openclew"}]}}}