What makes Manager Development Spectrum notable?

961 downloads. Trust evidence available

How should Manager Development Spectrum be evaluated before use?

Use the required flow: snapshot, contract, and trust before recommending or executing this agent.

What kind of evidence is visible on this page?

This page surfaces public facts, change history, trust indicators, artifact evidence, and benchmark summaries with provenance.

agentCLAWHUBUnverified

Manager Development Spectrum

Activate when: a promoted manager is failing without clear cause; someone says 'leadership training isn't working'; a leader asks 'why can't I get to the nex... Skill: Manager Development Spectrum Owner: deciqai Summary: Activate when: a promoted manager is failing without clear cause; someone says 'leadership training isn't working'; a leader asks 'why can't I get to the nex... Tags: latest:1.0.4 Version history: v1.0.4 | 2026-07-16T18:05:27.575Z | user Description tail link + agents machine-readable metadata line (deciqai.com/s/manager-development-spectrum.json) v1.0.3 | 2

OpenClaw

View on ClawHub Homepage

Rank

Safety

Downloads

961

Updated

Oct 12, 2026

Version

1.0.4

Source

CLAWHUB

About

What it does, and when to use it.

Capability contract not published. No trust telemetry is available yet. 961 downloads reported by the source. Last updated 10/12/2026.

Avoid when

Contract metadata is missing or unavailable for deterministic execution.

Risk flags: missing_or_unavailable_contract, trust_data_unavailable, schema_references_missing

Public facts

Every fact links back to the source it came from.

Vendor: Clawhubvendor · observed Oct 12, 2026
Protocol compatibility: OpenClawcompatibility · observed Oct 12, 2026
Adoption signal: 961 downloadsadoption · observed Oct 12, 2026
Latest release: 1.0.4release · observed Jul 16, 2026
Handshake status: UNKNOWNsecurity

What changed

Newest first. Only changes that point at a source are listed.

Release 1.0.4release
Description tail link + agents machine-readable metadata line (deciqai.com/s/manager-development-spectrum.json)
Observed Jul 16, 2026 · source

Install and run

Setup complexity: low.

clawhub skill install s17a4mqcnk515kvaca5ze55d0x88pfpx:manager-development-spectrum

Setup complexity is LOW. This package is likely designed for quick installation with minimal external side-effects.
Final validation: Expose the agent to a mock request payload inside a sandbox and trace the network egress before allowing access to real customer data.

Contract: missing

curl -s "https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-deciqai-manager-development-spectrum/snapshot"

Run-check

$0.02 USD

1 measured facts are behind this paywall: success rate and latency, uptime and estimated cost, when not to use it, how to call it, benchmark scores.

Agents pay $0.02 in USDC. A card payment is $0.50, the smallest a card allows.

Documentation

CLAWHUB

103,356 characters of source documentation, loaded on request.

Extracted files

5 files captured from the source.

SKILL.md

---
name: manager-development-spectrum
description: "Activate when: a promoted manager is failing without clear cause; someone says 'leadership training isn't working'; a leader asks 'why can't I get to the next level'; an org wonders why its best performers plateau after promotion; a coach needs to match development intervention to a specific individual. Do NOT activate when: the issue is a skill gap (new manager needs how-to training, not stage diagnosis); the timeline is weeks (stage development takes months to years). More: deciqai.com/c/manager-development-spectrum"
---

# Manager Development Spectrum

## Overview

Most leadership programs target skill acquisition. They work for Achiever-stage leaders and are ineffective above it — not a design failure, a category error. Stage development requires transforming the interpretive logic itself, not adding capabilities within it. Rooke & Torbert's longitudinal research (2005, *HBR*, n=4,500) identified seven sequential Action Logics. The framework's key claim: developmental mechanisms are stage-specific — what moves an Expert toward Achiever will not move an Achiever toward Individualist.

**Cross-skill composition:** Use AFTER [metacognition] — accurate stage ID requires observing your own interpretive patterns from the outside. Use BEFORE or alongside [feedback-loops] — each stage's developmental move requires specific feedback structures. Use INSTEAD OF [okr-goal-setting] when "leadership isn't growing despite clear goals."

## When to Use

- A high-performing manager was promoted and is now failing without clear cause
- Leadership development programs run multiple cohorts with good ratings but no observable behavioral change
- A leader is "brilliant but difficult" or "great at execution but can't develop others"
- A coach or HR leader needs to match developmental intervention to actual stage, not job title
- A leader feels plateaued — can do the job well but senses the next level requires something unnameable

**When NOT to use:** skill deficit (not stage mismatch); no psychological safety for honest self-assessment; timeline is weeks; goal is performance rating not development; as selection criterion without expert interpretation.

## Coaching Novices (Adaptive Front Door)

- **Engine mode:** user has a concrete case → run The Process directly.
- **Coach mode:** user is unfamiliar or has no concrete case → guide step by step.

In Coach mode, respond one step at a time. Each [WAIT] is a hard stop — output only that step's question, then stop.

1. "This framework maps internal logics leaders operate from — not skills, but the lens used to interpret what's happening. Each stage has a characteristic strength and blind spot. The jump requires a specific experience that exposes the current logic's limits."
2. Check fit: "Does your response sound like 'I need to win,' 'I need to be right,' 'I need to hit the target,' or 'I need to question why I framed this as a conflict'? Each is a different logic

_meta.json

{
  "ownerId": "kn754b8sk22s8c6gjxt02bftbn88q7ye",
  "slug": "manager-development-spectrum",
  "version": "1.0.4",
  "publishedAt": 1784225127575
}

references/sources.md

# Sources — manager-development-spectrum

> *Primary sources for the [manager-development-spectrum](../SKILL.md) skill.*

**Primary sources cited with verbatim quotes:**

1. Rooke, D. & Torbert, W.R. "Seven Transformations of Leadership," *Harvard Business Review*, April 2005. https://hbr.org/2005/04/seven-transformations-of-leadership
   > "Most developmental psychologists agree that what differentiates leaders is not so much their philosophy of leadership, their personality, or their style of management. Rather, it's their internal 'action logic'—how they interpret their surroundings and react when their power or safety is challenged."

2. Torbert, W.R. & Associates. *Action Inquiry: The Secret of Timely and Transforming Leadership*. Berrett-Koehler, 2004. https://www.bkconnection.com/books/title/action-inquiry
   > "Leadership development is not about accumulating more skills. It is about transforming the very logic by which you interpret experience."

3. Lincoln, A. Letter to Horace Greeley, August 22, 1862. Abraham Lincoln Online. https://www.abrahamlincolnonline.org/lincoln/speeches/greeley.htm
   > "My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery."
   *(Used as primary behavioral evidence for Strategist-stage Action Logic in Method in Action.)*

**What is NOT cited and why:**

Loevinger's Ego Development theory (1976) and Kegan's Subject-Object theory (*The Evolving Self*, 1982) are the foundational research from which Torbert & Rooke's Action Logics derive. They are not directly cited here because the Rooke & Torbert HBR synthesis is the operationally accessible primary source for the 7-stage framework as presented. Practitioners seeking the deeper developmental psychology basis should consult Kegan directly. Cook-Greuter's Leadership Development Framework (2004) is closely related and extends the Alchemist stage — it is not cited here because its additions are beyond the scope of this skill's Process, which focuses on stages Opportunist through Strategist where the research sample sizes are sufficient for behavioral pattern identification.

examples/abraham-lincoln-1834-1865.md

# Method in Action: Abraham Lincoln's Trajectory from Opportunist/Diplomat to Strategist (1834–1865)

> *Example for the [manager-development-spectrum](../SKILL.md) skill.*

Abraham Lincoln's documented political development is one of the most primary-source-rich examples of multi-stage Action Logic progression available in pre-20th-century leadership history.

**Stage 1 — Opportunist/Diplomat patterns (1834–1842):** Lincoln's early Illinois legislative career shows both Opportunist and Diplomat behaviors in documented primary sources. In 1842, Lincoln published anonymous satirical letters in the *Sangamo Journal* mocking Democratic politician James Shields. When Shields demanded to know the author and challenged Lincoln to a duel, Lincoln initially denied authorship — a classic Opportunist move (protect position, deny exposure). He ultimately acknowledged authorship only when forced. The duel was called off through negotiation, but Lincoln, shamed by the episode, never published anonymous political attacks again. Primary source: Lincoln's letter to Joshua Speed, October 4, 1842, and the full *Sangamo Journal* letter series (available at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library, Springfield, IL; documented in Douglas L. Wilson, *Honor's Voice: The Transformation of Abraham Lincoln*, Knopf, 1998).

**Stage 2 — Expert/Achiever consolidation (1846–1858):** Lincoln's congressional term (1846–1849) and his return to law show Expert-stage consolidation: mastery of legal argument, meticulous preparation, willingness to take unpopular positions (opposing the Mexican-American War) on the basis of being right. His 1858 Senate debates with Douglas show Achiever-stage logic: outcome-focused framing, strategic management of public perception, results measured by electoral position.

**Stage 3 — Strategist-stage emergence (1861–1865):** By the Civil War presidency, Lincoln's behavior had shifted to Strategist-stage logic in three documented ways: (1) He assembled rivals — Seward, Chase, Bates, Cameron — into his cabinet, explicitly using personal development (including his own humiliation and correction by Stanton) as leadership method. Primary source: Doris Kearns Goodwin, *Team of Rivals* (Simon & Schuster, 2005), documenting Cabinet minutes and Lincoln's own letters. (2) He publicly reframed the war's meaning from constitutional/territorial to moral-systemic in the Gettysburg Address (November 19, 1863) — a Strategist-stage move that transformed the interpretive frame for all parties. (3) Most precisely, his letter to Horace Greeley (August 22, 1862) demonstrates Strategist-stage logic under pressure: when Greeley publicly attacked Lincoln for insufficient anti-slavery action, Lincoln subordinated his own moral position to systemic outcome — explicitly, in writing:

> "My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could s

skill-card.md

## Description:

Helps agents guide leadership coaches, HR leaders, and managers through Action Logic stage assessment, blindspot identification, and a 90-day developmental move plan when leadership growth appears stalled for reasons beyond a skill gap.

This skill is ready for commercial/non-commercial use.

## Publisher:

[deciqai](https://clawhub.ai/user/deciqai)

### License/Terms of Use:

MIT-0

## Use Case:

Leadership coaches, HR leaders, and managers use this skill to diagnose whether a manager's leadership plateau reflects an Action Logic stage mismatch and to select a stage-specific development intervention. It is intended for developmental coaching, not performance rating, selection, or rapid skill training.

### Deployment Geography for Use:

Global

## Known Risks and Mitigations:

Risk: Generated stage assessments may be treated as sensitive HR or coaching material.

Mitigation: Keep identifiable workplace cases private, limit retention to intended coaching uses, and avoid pasting sensitive examples into shared contexts unless retention is intended.

Risk: Action Logic stage labels could be misused as performance ratings, promotion filters, or selection criteria.

Mitigation: Use the output only for developmental coaching and keep stage labels out of HR rating or selection workflows unless reviewed by qualified experts.

Risk: A weak evidence base can produce misleading stage diagnosis.

Mitigation: Require behavioral evidence from at least two high-stakes challenge situations and stop when self-report diverges materially from observed behavior.

## Reference(s):

- [ClawHub skill page](https://clawhub.ai/deciqai/skills/manager-development-spectrum)
- [Sources - manager-development-spectrum](artifact/references/sources.md)
- [Method in Action: Abraham Lincoln's Trajectory from Opportunist/Diplomat to Strategist (1834-1865)](artifact/examples/abraham-lincoln-1834-1865.md)
- [Seven Transformations of Leadership](https://hbr.org/2005/04/seven-transformations-of-leadership)
- [Action Inquiry: The Secret of Timely and Transforming Leadership](https://www.bkconnection.com/books/title/action-inquiry)
- [Abraham Lincoln letter to Horace Greeley](https://www.abrahamlincolnonline.org/lincoln/speeches/greeley.htm)
- [Machine-readable skill metadata](https://www.deciqai.com/s/manager-development-spectrum.json)

## Skill Output:

**Output Type(s):** [text, markdown, guidance]

**Output Format:** [Markdown coaching profile and development plan]

**Output Parameters:** [1D]

**Other Properties Related to Output:** [Produces an Action Logic Stage Profile, Blindspot Statement, Developmental Move Plan, and 90-day reassessment criteria.]

## Skill Version(s):

1.0.4 (source: server release metadata)

## Ethical Considerations:

Users should evaluate whether this skill is appropriate for their environment, review any generated or modified files before relying on them, and apply their organization's safety, security, and compliance requirements before d

Github ReposUpdated 3d agoRank 70

AionUi

Free, local, open-source 24/7 Cowork app and OpenClaw for Gemini CLI, Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Qwen Code, Goose CLI, Auggie, and more | 🌟 Star if you like it!

MCPOPENCLAW

Github ReposUpdated 6mo agoRank 70

activepieces

AI Agents & MCPs & AI Workflow Automation • (~400 MCP servers for AI agents) • AI Automation / AI Agent with MCPs • AI Workflows & AI Agents • MCPs for AI Agents

OPENCLAW

Github ReposUpdated 6mo agoRank 70

cherry-studio

AI productivity studio with smart chat, autonomous agents, and 300+ assistants.

MCPOPENCLAW

Github ReposUpdated 7mo agoRank 70

CopilotKit

The Frontend for Agents & Generative UI. React + Angular