What makes Principle Comparator notable?

2K downloads. Trust evidence available

How should Principle Comparator be evaluated before use?

Use the required flow: snapshot, contract, and trust before recommending or executing this agent.

What kind of evidence is visible on this page?

This page surfaces public facts, change history, trust indicators, artifact evidence, and benchmark summaries with provenance.

agentCLAWHUBUnverified

Principle Comparator

Compare two sources to find shared and divergent principles — discover what survives independent observation. Skill: Principle Comparator Owner: leegitw Summary: Compare two sources to find shared and divergent principles — discover what survives independent observation. Tags: agreement:1.0.3, alignment:1.0.3, analysis:1.0.3, common-ground:1.0.3, comparison:1.0.3, diff:1.0.3, latest:1.0.3, openclaw:1.0.3, principles:1.0.3, synthesis:1.0.3 Version history: v1.0.3 | 2026-03-25T20:53:09.275Z | auto No user-facing changes; file

OpenClaw

View on ClawHub Homepage

Rank

Safety

Downloads

2.0k

Updated

Oct 9, 2026

Version

1.0.3

Source

CLAWHUB

About

What it does, and when to use it.

Capability contract not published. No trust telemetry is available yet. 2K downloads reported by the source. Last updated 10/9/2026.

Avoid when

Contract metadata is missing or unavailable for deterministic execution.

Risk flags: missing_or_unavailable_contract, trust_data_unavailable, schema_references_missing

Public facts

Every fact links back to the source it came from.

Vendor: Clawhubvendor · observed Oct 9, 2026
Protocol compatibility: OpenClawcompatibility · observed Oct 9, 2026
Adoption signal: 2K downloadsadoption · observed Oct 9, 2026
Latest release: 1.0.3release · observed Mar 25, 2026
Handshake status: UNKNOWNsecurity

Install and run

Setup complexity: low.

clawhub skill install s179srg0a58h1v79wy2w7g9ymh83jxhd:principle-comparator

Setup complexity is LOW. This package is likely designed for quick installation with minimal external side-effects.
Final validation: Expose the agent to a mock request payload inside a sandbox and trace the network egress before allowing access to real customer data.

Contract: missing

curl -s "https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-leegitw-principle-comparator/snapshot"

Documentation

CLAWHUB

42,081 characters of source documentation, loaded on request.

Extracted files

3 files captured from the source.

SKILL.md

---
name: Principle Comparator
version: 1.0.2
description: Compare two sources to find shared and divergent principles — discover what survives independent observation.
homepage: https://github.com/live-neon/skills/tree/main/pbd/principle-comparator
user-invocable: true
emoji: ⚖️
tags:
  - comparison
  - principles
  - common-ground
  - agreement
  - diff
  - analysis
  - alignment
  - synthesis
  - openclaw
---

# Principle Comparator

## Agent Identity

**Role**: Help users find what principles survive across different expressions
**Understands**: Users comparing sources need objectivity, not advocacy for either side
**Approach**: Compare extractions to identify invariants vs variations
**Boundaries**: Report observations, never determine which source is "correct"
**Tone**: Analytical, balanced, clear about confidence levels
**Opening Pattern**: "You have two sources that might share deeper patterns — let's find where they agree and where they diverge."

**Data handling**: This skill operates within your agent's trust boundary. All comparison analysis
uses your agent's configured model — no external APIs or third-party services are called.
If your agent uses a cloud-hosted LLM (Claude, GPT, etc.), data is processed by that service
as part of normal agent operation. This skill does not write files to disk.

## When to Use

Activate this skill when the user asks to:
- "Compare these two extractions"
- "What do these sources have in common?"
- "Find the shared principles"
- "Validate this principle against another source"
- "Which ideas appear in both?"

## Important Limitations

- Compares STRUCTURE, not correctness — both sources could be wrong
- Cannot determine which source is better
- Semantic alignment requires judgment — verify my matches
- Works best with extractions from pbe-extractor/essence-distiller
- N=2 is validation, not proof

---

## Input Requirements

User provides ONE of:
- Two extraction outputs (from pbe-extractor or essence-distiller)
- Two raw text sources (I'll extract first, then compare)
- One extraction + one raw source

### Input Format

```json
{
  "source_a": {
    "type": "extraction",
    "hash": "a1b2c3d4",
    "principles": [...]
  },
  "source_b": {
    "type": "raw_text",
    "content": "..."
  }
}
```

Or simply provide two pieces of content and I'll handle the rest.

---

## Methodology

This skill compares extractions to find **shared and divergent principles** using N-count validation.

### N-Count Tracking

| N-Count | Status | Meaning |
|---------|--------|---------|
| N=1 | Observation | Single source, needs validation |
| N=2 | Validated | Two independent sources agree |
| N≥3 | Invariant | Candidate for Golden Master |

### Semantic Alignment (on Normalized Forms)

Two principles are semantically aligned when their **normalized forms** express the same core value:

**Aligned** (same normalized meaning):
- A: "Values truthfulness over comfort"
- B: "Values honesty in difficult situations"
- Alignment: H

_meta.json

{
  "ownerId": "kn709ajvpej12sahm1ay1262qs80ehps",
  "slug": "principle-comparator",
  "version": "1.0.3",
  "publishedAt": 1774471989275
}

skill-card.md

## Description:

Compare two sources to find shared and divergent principles — discover what survives independent observation.

This skill is ready for commercial/non-commercial use.

## Publisher:

[leegitw](https://clawhub.ai/user/leegitw)

### License/Terms of Use:

MIT-0

## Use Case:

Developers, analysts, and knowledge workers use this skill to compare two extractions or raw text sources and identify shared principles, source-specific ideas, and divergences. It supports pattern validation while leaving correctness judgments to the user.

### Deployment Geography for Use:

Global

## Known Risks and Mitigations:

Risk: Compared content is processed by the configured agent model, which may be cloud-hosted.

Mitigation: Use the skill only for deliberate two-source comparison tasks and avoid submitting sensitive content unless the configured agent environment is approved for that data.

Risk: The skill compares structure and semantic alignment, not factual correctness.

Mitigation: Treat shared principles as pattern evidence and review conclusions before relying on them.

Risk: The artifact contains stray wording about requires_review.md even though security evidence says the skill does not write files.

Mitigation: Do not create review files unless the user explicitly requests a file output.

## Reference(s):

- [ClawHub skill page](https://clawhub.ai/leegitw/skills/principle-comparator)
- [Publisher profile](https://clawhub.ai/user/leegitw)
- [Skill homepage](https://github.com/live-neon/skills/tree/main/pbd/principle-comparator)

## Skill Output:

**Output Type(s):** [text, markdown, json, guidance]

**Output Format:** [Markdown narrative with optional JSON comparison results]

**Output Parameters:** [1D]

**Other Properties Related to Output:** [May include shared principles, source-specific principles, divergence analysis, confidence levels, N-counts, next steps, and an optional share_text when high-confidence N=2 alignment is found.]

## Skill Version(s):

1.0.3 (source: server release evidence; artifact frontmatter states 1.0.2)

## Ethical Considerations:

Users should evaluate whether this skill is appropriate for their environment, review any generated or modified files before relying on them, and apply their organization's safety, security, and compliance requirements before deployment.

Github ReposUpdated 7h agoRank 70

AionUi

Free, local, open-source 24/7 Cowork app and OpenClaw for Gemini CLI, Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Qwen Code, Goose CLI, Auggie, and more | 🌟 Star if you like it!

MCPOPENCLAW

Github ReposUpdated 6mo agoRank 70

activepieces

AI Agents & MCPs & AI Workflow Automation • (~400 MCP servers for AI agents) • AI Automation / AI Agent with MCPs • AI Workflows & AI Agents • MCPs for AI Agents

OPENCLAW

Github ReposUpdated 6mo agoRank 70

cherry-studio

AI productivity studio with smart chat, autonomous agents, and 300+ assistants.

MCPOPENCLAW

Github ReposUpdated 7mo agoRank 70

CopilotKit

The Frontend for Agents & Generative UI. React + Angular