Xpersona
P

Phy Paper Polish

CLAWHUB · Unverified

This skills helps agents to review and polish research papers written in LaTeX, focusing on writing clarity, grammar, LaTeX best practices, and document stru... Skill: Phy Paper Polish Owner: phy041 Summary: This skills helps agents to review and polish research papers written in LaTeX, focusing on writing clarity, grammar, LaTeX best practices, and document stru... Tags: academic:1.0.0, latest:1.0.2, latex:1.0.0, review:1.0.0, writing:1.0.0 Version history: v1.0.2 | 2026-03-22T14:03:07.936Z | auto - Added an "Author" section with contact and project links at the end of the

62
Rank
84
Safety
992
Downloads

About

What it does, and when to use it.

Capability contract not published. No trust telemetry is available yet. 992 downloads reported by the source. Last updated 10/11/2026.

Avoid when

  • Contract metadata is missing or unavailable for deterministic execution.

Risk flags: missing_or_unavailable_contract, trust_data_unavailable, schema_references_missing

Install and run

Setup complexity: low.

clawhub skill install s175g2rty8e4mw6h9zcwwgxmfn884t23:phy-paper-polish
  1. Setup complexity is LOW. This package is likely designed for quick installation with minimal external side-effects.
  2. Final validation: Expose the agent to a mock request payload inside a sandbox and trace the network egress before allowing access to real customer data.

Contract: missing

curl -s "https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-phy041-phy-paper-polish/snapshot"

Run-check

$0.02 USD

1 measured facts are behind this paywall: success rate and latency, uptime and estimated cost, when not to use it, how to call it, benchmark scores.

Agents pay $0.02 in USDC. A card payment is $0.50, the smallest a card allows.

Documentation

CLAWHUB

20,292 characters of source documentation, loaded on request.

Extracted files

3 files captured from the source.

SKILL.md

---
name: paper-polish
description: This skills helps agents to review and polish research papers written in LaTeX, focusing on writing clarity, grammar, LaTeX best practices, and document structure.
homepage: https://canlah.ai
metadata:
  short-description: fixing writing errors in academic papers

---
# Polishing and reviewing research papers in LaTeX

## On writing

### Contents

- Your paper should be easily comprehensible by its reviewers.
  They are far less familiar with your work than you.
  They may not be an expert on the topic and may not be able to afford much time on your paper.
- The introduction should convey curiosity or excitement
  (new problem, new solution, improved solution, impressive results, or high impact),
  the design novelty, substantiality, and correctness,
  and the evaluation relevancy and comprehensiveness.
- Conciseness: Remove every word that contributes no meaning, such as `kind of`.
- Use proper tenses:
  - [1](https://www.unlv.edu/sites/default/files/page_files/27/GradCollege-VerbTenseScientificManuscripts.pdf)
  - [2](https://berks.psu.edu/sites/berks/files/campus/VerbTense_Handout.pdf)
  - [3](https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/effective-writing-13815989/)

### Grammar

- Section titles should have consistent [capitalization](https://www.grammarly.com/blog/title-case-sentence-case/).
  - Title Case: Capitalize the first and last words and all major words in between.
    - Good: Introduction to Fuzzing with LLMs
  - Sentence case: Capitalize only the first word and proper nouns.
    - Good: Introduction to fuzzing with LLMs
  - Choose one style and be consistent throughout the paper.

- Avoid passive voice unless strongly justifiable.
  Passive voice is ambiguous because it has no subject unless followed by "by...".
  - Bad: LLM was applied to fuzzing. (Who applied it? The authors or someone else?)
  - Good: We applied LLM to fuzzing.

- Avoid [nominalization](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominalization).
  - Bad: He made a proposal to use Rust.
  - Good: He proposed to use Rust.

- Avoid "There is/are".
  - Bad: There are many developers of Rust.
  - Good: Many developers use Rust.
  - Good: Rust has many developers.

- "Which" vs "that": Use "which" in a nonrestrictive clause and "that" in a restrictive clause.
  [More...](https://www.grammarly.com/blog/which-vs-that/)
  - Wrong: Rust that is safe is popular.
    (This is wrong because there is only one Rust.)
  - Right: Rust, which is safe, is popular.

- Distinguish [coordinating conjunction vs conjunctive adverbs](https://www.iup.edu/writingcenter/writing-resources/grammar/common-problems-with-however-therefore-and-similar-words.html).
  - Wrong: C is dangerous, Rust is safe. (Cannot join two sentences by a comma)
  - Right: C is dangerous, but Rust is safe.
  - Wrong: C is dangerous, however Rust is safe.
  - Right: C is dangerous; however, Rust is safe.

- "Fewer" modifies countable nouns whereas "less" uncountable nouns.
  - Wrong: ten items o

_meta.json

{
  "ownerId": "kn7fdhcxytgt3k2vvnc24c8ke581g5j1",
  "slug": "phy-paper-polish",
  "version": "1.0.2",
  "publishedAt": 1774188187936
}

skill-card.md

## Description:

This skill helps agents review and polish research papers written in LaTeX, focusing on writing clarity, grammar, LaTeX best practices, and document structure.

This skill is ready for commercial/non-commercial use.

## Publisher:

[phy041](https://clawhub.ai/user/phy041)

### License/Terms of Use:

MIT-0

## Use Case:

Researchers, authors, and technical editors use this skill to review LaTeX research papers for clearer writing, grammar, consistent structure, and LaTeX best practices before submission.

### Deployment Geography for Use:

Global

## Known Risks and Mitigations:

Risk: Suggested edits may change technical meaning or introduce inappropriate wording into a manuscript.

Mitigation: Review proposed changes against the author's technical intent before applying them.

Risk: Manuscripts may contain unpublished or sensitive research content.

Mitigation: Provide only the manuscript files intended for review and follow the applicable confidentiality requirements.

## Reference(s):

- [Phy Paper Polish on ClawHub](https://clawhub.ai/phy041/skills/phy-paper-polish)
- [Canlah AI](https://canlah.ai)
- [Verb Tense in Scientific Manuscripts](https://www.unlv.edu/sites/default/files/page_files/27/GradCollege-VerbTenseScientificManuscripts.pdf)
- [Effective Writing](https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/effective-writing-13815989/)
- [LuaTeX](https://www.luatex.org/)
- [BibLaTeX Documentation](https://www.overleaf.com/learn/latex/Bibliography_management_with_biblatex)
- [NIST Typefaces for Symbols in Scientific Manuscripts](https://physics.nist.gov/cuu/pdf/typefaces.pdf)

## Skill Output:

**Output Type(s):** [text, markdown, guidance]

**Output Format:** [Markdown prose with suggested edits and LaTeX guidance]

**Output Parameters:** [1D]

**Other Properties Related to Output:** [No executable code; output should be reviewed before applying changes to manuscripts.]

## Skill Version(s):

1.0.2 (source: server release evidence)

## Ethical Considerations:

Users should evaluate whether this skill is appropriate for their environment, review any generated or modified files before relying on them, and apply their organization's safety, security, and compliance requirements before deployment.

Sponsored

Ads related to Phy Paper Polish and adjacent AI workflows.