What makes code-review-skill notable?

1K downloads. Trust evidence available

How should code-review-skill be evaluated before use?

Use the required flow: snapshot, contract, and trust before recommending or executing this agent.

What kind of evidence is visible on this page?

This page surfaces public facts, change history, trust indicators, artifact evidence, and benchmark summaries with provenance.

agentCLAWHUBUnverified

code-review-skill

Perform a thorough code review of staged changes ensuring error handling, production readiness, code quality, and add comprehensive unit tests with specific... Skill: code-review-skill Owner: yaseenkadlemakki Summary: Perform a thorough code review of staged changes ensuring error handling, production readiness, code quality, and add comprehensive unit tests with specific... Tags: latest:1.0.0 Version history: v1.0.0 | 2026-04-25T21:09:41.813Z | user first push Archive index: Archive v1.0.0: 3 files, 2298 bytes Files: skill-card.md (1502b), skill.md (3000b), _meta.json (136

OpenClaw

View on ClawHub Homepage

Rank

Safety

Downloads

1.0k

Updated

Oct 11, 2026

Version

1.0.0

Source

CLAWHUB

About

What it does, and when to use it.

Capability contract not published. No trust telemetry is available yet. 1K downloads reported by the source. Last updated 10/11/2026.

Avoid when

Contract metadata is missing or unavailable for deterministic execution.

Risk flags: missing_or_unavailable_contract, trust_data_unavailable, schema_references_missing

Public facts

Every fact links back to the source it came from.

Vendor: Clawhubvendor · observed Oct 11, 2026
Protocol compatibility: OpenClawcompatibility · observed Oct 11, 2026
Adoption signal: 1K downloadsadoption · observed Oct 11, 2026
Latest release: 1.0.0release · observed Apr 25, 2026
Handshake status: UNKNOWNsecurity

Install and run

Setup complexity: low.

clawhub skill install s17267xnwtg8zks9j07yhsd70d85hp3e:code-review-skill

Setup complexity is LOW. This package is likely designed for quick installation with minimal external side-effects.
Final validation: Expose the agent to a mock request payload inside a sandbox and trace the network egress before allowing access to real customer data.

Contract: missing

curl -s "https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-yaseenkadlemakki-code-review-skill/snapshot"

Run-check

$0.02 USD

1 measured facts are behind this paywall: success rate and latency, uptime and estimated cost, when not to use it, how to call it, benchmark scores.

Agents pay $0.02 in USDC. A card payment is $0.50, the smallest a card allows.

Documentation

CLAWHUB

5,147 characters of source documentation, loaded on request.

Extracted files

3 files captured from the source.

skill.md

{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\cocoartf2822
\cocoatextscaling0\cocoaplatform0{\fonttbl\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Menlo-Regular;\f1\fnil\fcharset0 Menlo-Bold;}
{\colortbl;\red255\green255\blue255;\red193\green193\blue193;\red24\green24\blue24;\red85\green129\blue224;
\red70\green137\blue204;}
{\*\expandedcolortbl;;\cssrgb\c80000\c80000\c80000;\cssrgb\c12157\c12157\c12157;\cssrgb\c40392\c58824\c90196;
\cssrgb\c33725\c61176\c83922;}
\margl1440\margr1440\vieww11520\viewh8400\viewkind0
\deftab720
\pard\pardeftab720\partightenfactor0

\f0\fs24 \cf2 \cb3 \expnd0\expndtw0\kerning0
\outl0\strokewidth0 \strokec2 Perform a comprehensive code review current staged changes as a senior developer would, focusing on production readiness. Specifically:\cb1 \
\
\pard\pardeftab720\partightenfactor0
\cf4 \cb3 \strokec4 1.\cf2 \strokec2  
\f1\b \cf5 \strokec5 **Error Handling & Panic Prevention**
\f0\b0 \cf2 \strokec2 :\cb1 \
\pard\pardeftab720\partightenfactor0
\cf2 \cb3    \cf4 \strokec4 -\cf2 \strokec2  Review all error paths and ensure none can cause panics\cb1 \
\cb3    \cf4 \strokec4 -\cf2 \strokec2  Check for potential nil pointer dereferences\cb1 \
\cb3    \cf4 \strokec4 -\cf2 \strokec2  Verify that all file operations handle errors gracefully\cb1 \
\cb3    \cf4 \strokec4 -\cf2 \strokec2  Look for any unchecked type assertions or array/slice access that could panic\cb1 \
\
\pard\pardeftab720\partightenfactor0
\cf4 \cb3 \strokec4 2.\cf2 \strokec2  
\f1\b \cf5 \strokec5 **Production Readiness**
\f0\b0 \cf2 \strokec2 :\cb1 \
\pard\pardeftab720\partightenfactor0
\cf2 \cb3    \cf4 \strokec4 -\cf2 \strokec2  Verify logging levels are appropriate (debug vs info vs warn vs error)\cb1 \
\cb3    \cf4 \strokec4 -\cf2 \strokec2  Check if error messages provide sufficient context for debugging\cb1 \
\cb3    \cf4 \strokec4 -\cf2 \strokec2  Ensure the code handles edge cases\cb1 \
\cb3    \cf4 \strokec4 -\cf2 \strokec2  Consider if there are any race conditions or concurrency issues\cb1 \
\
\pard\pardeftab720\partightenfactor0
\cf4 \cb3 \strokec4 3.\cf2 \strokec2  
\f1\b \cf5 \strokec5 **Code Quality**
\f0\b0 \cf2 \strokec2 :\cb1 \
\pard\pardeftab720\partightenfactor0
\cf2 \cb3    \cf4 \strokec4 -\cf2 \strokec2  Look for any code duplication or opportunities for refactoring\cb1 \
\cb3    \cf4 \strokec4 -\cf2 \strokec2  Verify consistent error handling patterns with the rest of the codebase\cb1 \
\cb3    \cf4 \strokec4 -\cf2 \strokec2  Check if variable names are clear and follow Go conventions\cb1 \
\cb3    \cf4 \strokec4 -\cf2 \strokec2  Ensure comments are accurate and helpful\cb1 \
\
\pard\pardeftab720\partightenfactor0
\cf4 \cb3 \strokec4 4.\cf2 \strokec2  
\f1\b \cf5 \strokec5 **Unit Test**
\f0\b0 \cf2 \strokec2 :\cb1 \
\pard\pardeftab720\partightenfactor0
\cf2 \cb3    \cf4 \strokec4 -\cf2 \strokec2  Add a comprehensive unit test for the changes made\cb1 \
\
\cb3 Provide specific code fixes for any issues found, and include the complete unit and component test implementation.\cb1 \
}

_meta.json

{
  "ownerId": "kn71v0g5hyxhekx3dfj7ryrbkd85gxms",
  "slug": "code-review-skill",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "publishedAt": 1777151381813
}

skill-card.md

## Description:

Performs senior-level code review of staged changes with attention to error handling, production readiness, code quality, and unit tests.

This skill is ready for commercial/non-commercial use.

## Publisher:

[yaseenkadlemakki](https://clawhub.ai/user/yaseenkadlemakki)

### License/Terms of Use:

MIT-0

## Use Case:

Developers use this skill to review staged changes before merging, focusing on production-readiness issues, concrete fixes, and test coverage.

### Deployment Geography for Use:

Global

## Known Risks and Mitigations:

Risk: The skill can encourage broad code and test changes beyond a narrow review finding.

Mitigation: Scope any proposed edits to the staged change under review, inspect generated patches before applying them, and run the relevant test suite.

## Reference(s):


## Skill Output:

**Output Type(s):** [text, markdown, code, shell commands, guidance]

**Output Format:** [Markdown with review findings, suggested fixes, and test implementation details]

**Output Parameters:** [1D]

**Other Properties Related to Output:** [May include complete code and unit or component test suggestions for issues found during review.]

## Skill Version(s):

1.0.0 (source: release evidence)

## Ethical Considerations:

Users should evaluate whether this skill is appropriate for their environment, review any generated or modified files before relying on them, and apply their organization's safety, security, and compliance requirements before deployment.

Github ReposUpdated 2d agoRank 70

AionUi

Free, local, open-source 24/7 Cowork app and OpenClaw for Gemini CLI, Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Qwen Code, Goose CLI, Auggie, and more | 🌟 Star if you like it!

MCPOPENCLAW

Github ReposUpdated 6mo agoRank 70

activepieces

AI Agents & MCPs & AI Workflow Automation • (~400 MCP servers for AI agents) • AI Automation / AI Agent with MCPs • AI Workflows & AI Agents • MCPs for AI Agents

OPENCLAW

Github ReposUpdated 6mo agoRank 70

cherry-studio

AI productivity studio with smart chat, autonomous agents, and 300+ assistants.