Xpersona
Claim this agent
agentCLAWHUBUnverified

GStack Review Stack

Use this skill when Codex needs gstack-style CEO/product, engineering, design, QA, release, or portfolio-shelf-space review. Trigger for requests like "use g... Skill: GStack Review Stack Owner: zack-dev-cm Summary: Use this skill when Codex needs gstack-style CEO/product, engineering, design, QA, release, or portfolio-shelf-space review. Trigger for requests like "use g... Tags: latest:0.1.2 Version history: v0.1.2 | 2026-05-22T20:44:28.344Z | user Call the local discovery helper through python3 so fresh ClawHub installs do not require executable file permissions. v0.1.1 |

OpenClaw
View on ClawHubHomepage

Rank

62

Safety

84

Downloads

3.4k

Updated

Oct 9, 2026

Version

0.1.2

Source

CLAWHUB

About

What it does, and when to use it.

Capability contract not published. No trust telemetry is available yet. 3.4K downloads reported by the source. Last updated 10/9/2026.

Avoid when

  • Contract metadata is missing or unavailable for deterministic execution.

Risk flags: missing_or_unavailable_contract, trust_data_unavailable, schema_references_missing

Public facts

Every fact links back to the source it came from.

Vendor
Clawhubvendor · observed Oct 9, 2026
Protocol compatibility
OpenClawcompatibility · observed Oct 9, 2026
Adoption signal
3.4K downloadsadoption · observed Oct 9, 2026
Latest release
0.1.2release · observed May 22, 2026
Handshake status
UNKNOWNsecurity

Install and run

Setup complexity: low.

clawhub skill install s170hyv1nagjajq3y5c6kpzx3s84jp29:gstack-review-stack
  1. Setup complexity is LOW. This package is likely designed for quick installation with minimal external side-effects.
  2. Final validation: Expose the agent to a mock request payload inside a sandbox and trace the network egress before allowing access to real customer data.

Contract: missing

curl -s "https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-zack-dev-cm-gstack-review-stack/snapshot"

Documentation

CLAWHUB

28,138 characters of source documentation, loaded on request.

Extracted files

5 files captured from the source.

SKILL.md

---
name: gstack-review-stack
description: Use this skill when Codex needs gstack-style CEO/product, engineering, design, QA, release, or portfolio-shelf-space review. Trigger for requests like "use gstack", "CEO review", "engineering plan review", "design critique", "QA gate", "ship gate", "which products should we keep", or "decide what to publish/unpublish".
metadata:
  openclaw:
    requires:
      bins:
        - python3
---

# GStack Review Stack

Use this skill to bring gstack-style review discipline into Codex and ClawHub workflows without copying the full upstream gstack playbooks into context.

This adapter is original guidance inspired by the public MIT-licensed `garrytan/gstack` project. When exact upstream behavior matters, inspect the local or upstream gstack clone and cite the specific file used.

## Start

1. Run `python3 scripts/find_gstack.py --summary` from the skill folder to locate the local gstack clone and list available upstream skill files.
2. Choose the narrowest review mode that matches the user's request.
3. Load only the reference file needed for that mode:
   - Product, portfolio, scope, or slot decisions: `references/review-rubric.md`
   - Release, QA, or "is this ready to ship": `references/ship-and-qa.md`
   - UI/UX plans or visual quality: `references/design-review.md`
4. If the task involves live publishing, store actions, or irreversible changes, make the recommendation first and only execute after explicit user approval.

## Modes

### CEO/Product Review

Use for strategy, portfolio, scope expansion/reduction, product line focus, and "what should we build/keep/kill?"

Default stance: selective expansion with reduction discipline.

Output:
- Current facts and missing facts
- What is not in scope
- Candidate options
- Green/yellow/red classification
- Named tradeoffs
- Recommended decision and explicit next action

### Engineering Review

Use before implementation or release when architecture, data flow, edge cases, permissions, or maintainability are the risk.

Output:
- Critical paths
- Failure modes
- Test coverage map
- Security/privacy risk
- Performance and maintenance risks
- Blocking fixes before release

### Design Review

Use for UI/UX, landing pages, extension side panels, listing assets, screenshots, and flows.

Output:
- 0-10 rating by dimension
- What would make it a 10
- Specific edits, not taste adjectives
- Mobile/responsive and empty/error/loading states
- "AI-slop" flags: generic layouts, vague copy, ornamental visuals, overcomplicated text

### QA And Ship Gate

Use when the user asks to test, publish, deploy, submit, or release.

Output:
- Tests run and results
- User-flow evidence
- Remaining blockers
- Rollback or recovery path
- Clear ship/no-ship recommendation

## Decision Rules

- Prefer real demand over technical novelty.
- Prefer recurring use over one-time curiosity.
- Prefer narrow permissions and simple privacy disclosures.
- Keep scarce slots only for products that beat a named a

_meta.json

{
  "ownerId": "kn7dhjt1k1f111whp13fmrqwnh81tn1v",
  "slug": "gstack-review-stack",
  "version": "0.1.2",
  "publishedAt": 1779482668344
}

references/design-review.md

# Design Review

Use this for UI/UX plans, landing pages, store listings, extension popups, side panels, and screenshots.

## Score 0-10

Rate:
- First-screen clarity
- User job clarity
- Trust and permission comfort
- Visual originality
- Interaction completeness
- Mobile/responsive behavior
- Copy simplicity
- Empty/error/loading states

For each score below 8, write the exact change that would raise it.

## AI-Slop Flags

Flag:
- Generic centered hero with vague claims
- Overdecorated cards with no workflow density
- Text that a nontechnical user cannot understand
- Screenshots that do not show the actual product
- Permission-heavy UX without trust explanation
- Missing empty/error states
- Unclear call to action

## Required Output

Give concrete edits:
- Replace this phrase with that phrase
- Move this control here
- Add/remove this state
- Change screenshot composition
- Simplify the listing promise

references/review-rubric.md

# Review Rubric

Use this for CEO/product, portfolio, and publish/unpublish decisions.

## Shelf-Space Rule

Treat scarce release slots as shelf space. A new candidate must beat a named incumbent or it stays draft.

Score each candidate 0-5, weighted to 100:

| Weight | Category | Question |
|---:|---|---|
| 30 | Demand reality | Does current usage, growth, retention, or user pull exist? |
| 20 | Strategic coherence | Does this compound the product line and audience? |
| 15 | Distribution efficiency | Does search/listing/channel fit make acquisition plausible? |
| 15 | Quality and trust | Are permissions, privacy, reviews, and policy risk acceptable? |
| 10 | Focus cost | Does it fragment attention or duplicate another product? |
| 10 | Option value | Is the test reversible and likely to teach something useful? |

## Gates

Green:
- Real demand or a strong specific wedge
- Clear user and job
- Low policy and trust risk
- Measurable 30-day success test

Yellow:
- Plausible but evidence-light
- Needs clearer positioning
- Overlaps another candidate
- Keep as draft until it beats a live item

Red:
- Near-zero users and no growth signal
- High policy/trust risk
- Novelty-only or time-bound
- Exists because it was easy to ship

## Required Output

Include:
- Ranked keep list
- Ranked cut list
- Hold-as-draft list
- The exact evidence behind each cut
- The first irreversible action that needs explicit approval

references/ship-and-qa.md

# Ship And QA Gate

Use this for release, publish, deploy, submit-for-review, and "is it ready?" work.

## Ship Gate

Before release:
- Confirm package/version identity.
- Confirm permission and privacy disclosures match actual behavior.
- Run local unit and e2e checks appropriate to the blast radius.
- Test the main user flow as a real user, not only with mocked internals.
- Inspect logs/network errors for hidden failures.
- Confirm listing screenshots, icons, URLs, support links, and privacy pages.
- Identify store-side or account-side blockers separately from code blockers.

## QA Output

Report:
- Tests run
- User flows verified
- Critical failures found/fixed
- Remaining blockers
- Ship/no-ship recommendation
- Rollback or recovery path

## Stop Conditions

Stop before destructive actions unless the user explicitly approved:
- Unpublish/delete/hide a live listing
- Submit a store listing with inaccurate claims
- Publish with known broken core flow
- Ship a privacy disclosure that omits data sharing or permissions

Related agents

Same protocol, similar job.

Github ReposUpdated 6mo agoRank 70

activepieces

AI Agents & MCPs & AI Workflow Automation • (~400 MCP servers for AI agents) • AI Automation / AI Agent with MCPs • AI Workflows & AI Agents • MCPs for AI Agents

OPENCLAW
Github ReposUpdated 6mo agoRank 70

cherry-studio

AI productivity studio with smart chat, autonomous agents, and 300+ assistants.

MCPOPENCLAW
Github ReposUpdated 6mo agoRank 70

AionUi

Free, local, open-source 24/7 Cowork app and OpenClaw for Gemini CLI, Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Qwen Code, Goose CLI, Auggie, and more | 🌟 Star if you like it!

MCPOPENCLAW
Github ReposUpdated 7mo agoRank 70

CopilotKit

The Frontend for Agents & Generative UI. React + Angular

OPENCLAW

Machine-readable data

The same record, as JSON, for agents and crawlers.

{
  "facts": [
    {
      "factKey": "vendor",
      "category": "vendor",
      "label": "Vendor",
      "value": "Clawhub",
      "href": "https://clawhub.ai/zack-dev-cm/skills/gstack-review-stack",
      "sourceUrl": "https://clawhub.ai/zack-dev-cm/skills/gstack-review-stack",
      "sourceType": "profile",
      "confidence": "medium",
      "observedAt": "2026-10-09T08:32:40.440Z",
      "isPublic": true
    },
    {
      "factKey": "protocols",
      "category": "compatibility",
      "label": "Protocol compatibility",
      "value": "OpenClaw",
      "href": "https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-zack-dev-cm-gstack-review-stack/contract",
      "sourceUrl": "https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-zack-dev-cm-gstack-review-stack/contract",
      "sourceType": "contract",
      "confidence": "medium",
      "observedAt": "2026-10-09T08:32:40.440Z",
      "isPublic": true
    },
    {
      "factKey": "traction",
      "category": "adoption",
      "label": "Adoption signal",
      "value": "3.4K downloads",
      "href": "https://clawhub.ai/zack-dev-cm/gstack-review-stack",
      "sourceUrl": "https://clawhub.ai/zack-dev-cm/gstack-review-stack",
      "sourceType": "profile",
      "confidence": "medium",
      "observedAt": "2026-10-09T08:32:40.440Z",
      "isPublic": true
    },
    {
      "factKey": "latest_release",
      "category": "release",
      "label": "Latest release",
      "value": "0.1.2",
      "href": "https://clawhub.ai/zack-dev-cm/gstack-review-stack",
      "sourceUrl": "https://clawhub.ai/zack-dev-cm/gstack-review-stack",
      "sourceType": "release",
      "confidence": "medium",
      "observedAt": "2026-05-22T20:44:28.344Z",
      "isPublic": true
    },
    {
      "factKey": "handshake_status",
      "category": "security",
      "label": "Handshake status",
      "value": "UNKNOWN",
      "href": "https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-zack-dev-cm-gstack-review-stack/trust",
      "sourceUrl": "https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-zack-dev-cm-gstack-review-stack/trust",
      "sourceType": "trust",
      "confidence": "medium",
      "observedAt": null,
      "isPublic": true
    }
  ],
  "events": [
    {
      "eventType": "release",
      "title": "Release 0.1.2",
      "description": "Call the local discovery helper through python3 so fresh ClawHub installs do not require executable file permissions.",
      "href": "https://clawhub.ai/zack-dev-cm/gstack-review-stack",
      "sourceUrl": "https://clawhub.ai/zack-dev-cm/gstack-review-stack",
      "sourceType": "release",
      "confidence": "medium",
      "observedAt": "2026-05-22T20:44:28.344Z",
      "isPublic": true
    }
  ]
}

Record generated Oct 9, 2026.

Sponsored

Ads related to GStack Review Stack and adjacent AI workflows.