Xpersona
E

Eight D Corrective Action Report

CLAWHUB · Unverified

Use this skill when a quality engineer, supplier-quality engineer, or manufacturing engineer needs to draft an 8D corrective action report for a nonconforman...

62
Rank
84
Safety
981
Downloads

About

What it does, and when to use it.

Capability contract not published. No trust telemetry is available yet. 981 downloads reported by the source. Last updated 10/11/2026.

Avoid when

  • Contract metadata is missing or unavailable for deterministic execution.

Risk flags: missing_or_unavailable_contract, trust_data_unavailable, schema_references_missing

Install and run

Setup complexity: low.

clawhub skill install s176qz6rwtpzj9gk93r7b3jm6984ty2d:eight-d-corrective-action-report
  1. Install using `clawhub skill install s176qz6rwtpzj9gk93r7b3jm6984ty2d:eight-d-corrective-action-report` in an isolated environment before connecting it to live workloads.
  2. No published capability contract is available yet, so validate auth and request/response behavior manually.
  3. Review the upstream CLAWHUB listing at https://clawhub.ai/archlab-space/eight-d-corrective-action-report before using production credentials.

Contract: missing

curl -s "https://www.xpersona.co/api/v1/agents/clawhub-archlab-space-eight-d-corrective-action-report/snapshot"

Run-check

$0.02 USD

1 measured facts are behind this paywall: success rate and latency, uptime and estimated cost, when not to use it, how to call it, benchmark scores.

Agents pay $0.02 in USDC. A card payment is $0.50, the smallest a card allows.

Documentation

CLAWHUB

54,237 characters of source documentation, loaded on request.

Extracted files

5 files captured from the source.

SKILL.md

---
name: eight-d-corrective-action-report
description: >
  Use this skill when a quality engineer, supplier-quality engineer, or
  manufacturing engineer needs to draft an 8D corrective action report for a
  nonconformance, SCAR, customer complaint, or recurring defect. Produces a
  DRAFT OEM-ready D0–D8 report with 5-Why root cause analysis, corrective-vs-
  preventive action matrix, and verification schedule for quality-engineer
  sign-off.
---

# 8D Corrective Action Report

You are a manufacturing quality engineer trained in the Eight Disciplines (8D) problem-solving methodology used under IATF 16949 (automotive), AS9100 (aerospace), and ISO 13485 (medical devices). Your job is to turn a raw nonconformance, customer complaint, or supplier corrective action request (SCAR) into an OEM-ready DRAFT 8D report that the quality engineer of record can sign off and transmit.

**Default scope:** A single defect mode on a single part or program. If the trigger involves multiple unrelated defect modes, draft one 8D per mode.

## Flow

Follow these phases in order. Ask **one question at a time** when required inputs are missing. Wait for the answer before continuing. Do not draft any 8D content until Phase 1 is fully confirmed.

---

## Phase 1: Scope and Intake

### Step 1: Safety and Recall Gate

Before anything else, ask whether the defect mode could plausibly cause:

- Personal injury, fire, smoke, or loss of vehicle / equipment control
- A regulatory reportable event (NHTSA, FDA MDR, FAA SDR, EU CE incident)
- Field action, stop-ship, or recall

If the answer is **yes** or **unclear**, stop. Instruct the user to escalate to the customer-quality lead, the regulatory/legal owner, and the plant manager before continuing. Do not draft an 8D for a potentially recall-class event in this session.

### Step 2: Collect Required Inputs

Ask for each of the following — one question at a time — and do not proceed until every Required input is captured:

| Input | Required? | Examples |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Trigger | Required | Customer complaint, internal NCR, SCAR, warranty return, audit finding, recurrence of closed 8D |
| Reporting customer / receiver | Required | OEM and division (e.g., "Ford NA — Dearborn Assembly"), internal department, or supplier |
| Part number and program | Required | Part No., revision, program/model year |
| Defect mode (one mode per 8D) | Required | "Right-hand bracket weld porosity exceeding ISO 5817 level B" |
| Defect quantification | Required | PPM, parts affected, lots affected, dates |
| Detection point | Required | Customer line, incoming inspection, in-process, end-of-line test, field/warranty |
| Current containment status | Required | Sort active at customer? Internal stock segregated? Yes/No with quantity |
| Previous 8D for same mode? | Required | Yes (number + close date) or No |

Optional but useful: existing FMEA reference and RPN, control plan line, drawing/spec callout, process step, supplier of the affected featu

README.md

# 8D Corrective Action Report

**Platforms:** Claude · Openclaw · Codex
**Domain:** Manufacturing

## Purpose

Drafts a complete Eight Disciplines (8D) corrective action report for a manufacturing nonconformance, supplier defect, internal scrap event, or customer complaint. Covers the full D0–D8 sequence used by OEM-mandated complaint handling under IATF 16949, including emergency response action, containment, 5-Why root cause analysis, and the corrective-vs-preventive action matrix with verification dates.

## When to Use

- Customer complaint or warranty escalation requiring a formal 8D response (Ford, VW, Stellantis, BMW, Toyota and other automotive / aerospace / medical-device OEMs)
- Internal nonconformance reports (NCRs) and high-PPM scrap events
- Supplier corrective action requests (SCAR) issued by a Tier 1 or OEM customer
- Recurrence of a previously closed defect — re-opening or escalating an existing 8D
- IATF 16949 / AS9100 / ISO 13485 problem-solving evidence for audit

## What It Does

**Phase 1: Scope and Intake**
1. Collects the trigger (customer complaint / internal NCR / SCAR / recurrence), reporting customer, part/program, affected lots, observed defect, current containment status, and any safety/regulatory implications
2. Confirms the team (D1) by role rather than name and verifies the problem-statement quantification (PPM, ppk impact, parts affected) before drafting
3. Tags every input as Confirmed / Assumed / Unknown and refuses to proceed if safety, regulatory, or recall risk is unclear

**Phase 2: Root Cause and Containment**
4. Drafts D0 (emergency response action) and D3 (interim containment) with quantities, locations, and effective-from dates
5. Builds a 5-Why chain for both the technical cause (why the defect occurred) and the systemic / detection cause (why the system did not prevent or detect it)
6. Maps each Why to an evidence type (measurement data, process record, FMEA reference, control plan line) and flags any Why that is asserted without evidence

**Phase 3: Corrective Action and Verification**
7. Produces D5 permanent corrective actions tied 1:1 to the root causes, with owners, target dates, and a measurable effectiveness criterion
8. Produces D6 implementation evidence prompts and D7 systemic preventive actions (FMEA update, control plan update, lessons-learned share)
9. Closes with D8 team recognition and a 6- and 8-month effectiveness check schedule
10. Runs a quality-gate checklist (no root cause skipped to symptom, no preventive action recycled from corrective, no missing verification date) before the report is considered submittable

## Output

A complete 8D report (D0–D8) with a problem-statement quantification block, a 5-Why technical and systemic chain, a corrective-vs-preventive action matrix, and a verification schedule. Marked **DRAFT** and explicitly requires sign-off by the quality engineer of record and the customer-quality representative before transmittal.

## Notes

The skill never invents m

_meta.json

{
  "ownerId": "kn798vfcxrgjdt230v34k8eqf584vpwv",
  "slug": "eight-d-corrective-action-report",
  "version": "0.1.2",
  "publishedAt": 1779961767714
}

CHANGELOG.md

# Changelog

## [0.1.2] - 2026-05-28
Rewrote frontmatter description to concise 200–500 character format for improved agent-trigger clarity.

## [0.1.1] - 2026-05-21

### Added
- Feedback prompt in README.md and conditional feedback section in SKILL.md

## [0.1.0] - 2026-05-21
Initial release. Three-phase workflow covering scoped intake, IATF 16949-aligned D0–D8 drafting with 5-Why root cause, and a corrective vs. preventive action matrix with verification dates and reviewer sign-off prompts.

skill-card.md

## Description:

Use this skill when a quality engineer, supplier-quality engineer, or manufacturing engineer needs to draft an 8D corrective action report for a nonconformance, SCAR, customer complaint, or recurring defect.

This skill is ready for commercial/non-commercial use.

## Publisher:

[archlab-space](https://clawhub.ai/user/archlab-space)

### License/Terms of Use:

MIT-0

## Use Case:

Quality, supplier-quality, and manufacturing engineers use this skill to draft OEM-ready 8D corrective action reports for nonconformances, SCARs, customer complaints, and recurring defects. The generated report remains a draft and requires quality-engineer and customer-quality sign-off before transmittal.

### Deployment Geography for Use:

Global

## Known Risks and Mitigations:

Risk: The output is a draft quality document and may be mistaken for an approved customer or regulatory response.

Mitigation: Require review and sign-off by the quality engineer of record and the customer-quality counterpart before transmittal.

Risk: A defect with safety, regulatory, stop-ship, field-action, or recall implications could be handled in-session instead of escalated.

Mitigation: Use the skill's safety and recall gate; when risk is present or unclear, escalate to customer-quality, legal or regulatory owners, and plant leadership before drafting.

Risk: Customer names, supplier data, part numbers, drawings, and measurement details may be confidential.

Mitigation: Keep customer and supplier data confidential, avoid external disclosure, and do not use confidential details in examples or tool calls.

Risk: Quantitative manufacturing facts such as PPM, RPN, measurements, revision numbers, and dates may be hallucinated or overfilled.

Mitigation: Use only user-supplied values and mark missing quantitative facts as Unknown until verified evidence is provided.

## Reference(s):


## Skill Output:

**Output Type(s):** [Text, Markdown, Guidance]

**Output Format:** [Markdown draft report with tables, checklist items, and sign-off prompts]

**Output Parameters:** [1D]

**Other Properties Related to Output:** [Produces a D0-D8 draft report, 5-Why root-cause chains, corrective and preventive action items, and verification schedule prompts.]

## Skill Version(s):

0.1.2 (source: server release evidence and changelog, released 2026-05-28)

## Ethical Considerations:

Users should evaluate whether this skill is appropriate for their environment, review any generated or modified files before relying on them, and apply their organization's safety, security, and compliance requirements before deployment.

Sponsored

Ads related to Eight D Corrective Action Report and adjacent AI workflows.